UK ‘ARTICLE 51 LETTER’ TO UN IS 'INCHOATE' DISTRACTION FROM INVIOLABLE UNIVERSALLY RECOGNIZED SYRIAN SOVEREIGNTY (11.09.2015)
The British 'Article 51' letter to the UN ‘dated’ September 7th 2015 over the alleged British drone strike in Syria on August 21st 2015, some seventeen days earlier is incoherent and absent of any recognized defence in law.
The letter can be broken down into three impossibly disjointed elements, of pointedly failing to actually identify a target who was named in the British Parliament, while claiming the act was done in the ‘exercise’ of self defence in the face of an imminent armed attack in Britain, before critically relying on it being lawful in ‘defence of Iraq’.
The fact the actual (not so) lawful ‘defence’ the British government suddenly rely on after the event to supposedly prevent an imminent attack in Britain is the ‘defence of Iraq’, is clearly not only a completely incoherent non-starter but entirely dishonest.
It is not at all the case that the letter is ambiguous.
10.09.2015: GUARDIAN: UK MAKES 'NEW' LEGAL ARGUMENTS FOR DRONE KILLINGS IN SYRIA
It is impossible to argue that the letter is anything but deliberately dishonest.
In fact, the Article 51 Letter to the UN is only evidence of the inchoate criminal conspiracy to try and illegally invade Syria.
the 'exercise' of the lethal force 'relies' on the excusive 'defence of iraq' not britain
No part of the British regime could claim they ‘reasonably believed’ that conducting an air strike in Syria on a British national to supposedly prevent an imminent attack in Britain was lawful because it was done in ‘defence of Iraq’.
The crucial parts of the ‘letter’ that is not signed off on by or on behalf of the Attorney General, is that it omits it was against a named British national, while claiming it was done in the ‘exercise’ of defending an imminent attack [against what ??] in Britain, which the British regime claim was ‘lawful’ because it was done ‘in defence of Iraq’.
Even a High Court Judge could not launder that rubbish through the British Houses of Parliament gatekeeper, the ghastly Baroness Helena Kennedy QC & her corrupt sidekick Michael Mansfield at the phoney ’UK Rights Watch’.
10.09.2015 WAR CRIMES ALERT: UK & AUSTRALIA CITE INVADE SYRIA 'IN DEFENCE OF IRAQ' DOUBLE ACT IGNORES INVIOLABLE UNIVERSALLY RECOGNIZED SYRIAN SOVEREIGNTY
What everyone can really see is the truth is this.
Britain et al are publicly saying any old baloney to try and resile from the one inviolable legal reality which is that the Syrian government is the universally recognized government of the sovereign state of Syria.
The insurmountable legal obstacle the UK et al face is that any number of false pretexts do not in any way, shape or legal form, over-ride the sovereignty of the Syrian government and state.
It is a legal fact and reality the universally recognized Syrian government, not the British government run the sovereign state of Syria.
It is impossible to say (for example) in any court of law, that the 'rights' of the Iraqi 'government' (who are still really under occupation with an illegal constitution that was imposed on them) outweigh and over-ride the rights of the Syrian government.
The eternal savagery of the British regime exemplify the malaise that hangs over broken Britain where the entirety of the British regime is only completely devoted to endless plotting over how to make money out of murdering civilian populations.
This is not a regime that stays within any administrative boundaries at all.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.