UK PM DAVID CAMERON REPEATS & EXTENDS THREAT TO MURDER BRITISH ANTI-WAR CAMPAIGNERS ANYWHERE, TO TRY & STOP LEGAL CHALLENGE TO SYRIA WAR VOTE (08.09.2015)
In legal terms, it was considerably beyond churlish of the British Prime Minister (and 'news' media) to repeat and now extend his/their lethal threat from 2009, to murder British anti-war campaigners, anywhere, because he is/they are unable to come up with legal grounds to invade Syria,
In fact on and around August 21st 2015 which is supposedly the day of the 'drone strike' this civilian cut through the cacophony of war propaganda, and actually told the British 'news' media [and disrupted the plot of the Mayor of London trying to pass off our stolen display as his own] to cease and desist their war propaganda because it is criminal.
war criminals inc
While most of the human race engages in civilized past-times like enjoying a picnic in gorgeous sunshine, the uncouth and slovenly uncivilized, lying, thieving, mass murderers in the British regime only skulk around the corridors of Westminster, plotting how to make money out of murdering civilian populations.
The reason for this latest threat was that three successive British Prime Ministers, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and now David Cameron have not been able to actually produce legal grounds for illegal wars, so the danger of peace and justice breaking out in the Middle East and Europe increases !!!!
The war propaganda they use which is criminal is central to their ability to wage war.
The alleged 'drone strike' is actually being used to claim the British Parliament can carry out wider extra-judicial murders of British nationals (in this instance to try and stop legal challenges to wars)
Of course the latest British Prime Minister could not claim on any witness stand before a High Court jury that he 'reasonably believed' the British government had an unknown ’special right’ to conduct extra-judicial murders of British nationals anywhere.
The British Parliament have not even re-introduced the death penalty in Britain for British nationals, let alone any ability to extend this elsewhere.
The British Parliament can only wage illegal wars by trying to prevent legal challenges in courts of law, which is what Cameron & Co are really trying to do.
The FULL BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY 'HANSARD' TRANSCRIPT of what is being hidden behind arguably the largest war propaganda exercise Europe has ever engaged in during modern times, is published in a pdf below at the end.
The NATO ’news’ media war propaganda which really is criminal, typically acts like corrupt government lawyers.
They will fill folders upon folders in legal ‘cases’ with thousands upon thousands of pages of extraneous and utter irrelevance, to increase their fee and try and cover up the one line of truth.
In 'legal circles' this is called the 'scatter gun' approach which is really what war propaganda is too.
i.e: On May 19th 2006, the British Parliament (“both houses and black rod”) told the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police to smash our civilian resistance to NATO using whatever means possible really.
'parliament' square, london opposite the house of horrors aka 'houses of parliament'
1. The British war propaganda claimed it had (illegally) conducted a drone strike in Syria, yet did not actually produce any actual evidence (a Bin Laden redux) of any drone strike against the named person, which must all be recorded somewhere etc.
The British government did not have any mandate even for, let alone beyond "reconnaissance".
The import of Mr Cameron’s statement took some time to sink in and will reverberate in political and legal circles for some time.
...Mr Fallon had told the Commons in a written statement last October that RAF Reaper drones “are not authorised to use weapons in Syria; that would require further permission”. The defence secretary did not say at the time who might grant the permission or what process would be followed..."
2. The individual/s named had not even been ‘listed’ by the British government as an ‘enemy war combatant’ anywhere, so they could have the opportunity to hand themselves in etc.
In fact the British government refused to prosecute a European national called ‘Bherlin Guildo’.
3. Indeed Britain does not have the death penalty, let alone that the British government could impose in a country the British Prime Minister claims they are not at war with.
It is notable that the British Prime Minister only said he would notify the UN today, some 17 days AFTER the violation of Syrian air space etc allegedly on August 21st 2015.
The use of Article 51 is a non-starter because no armed attack by any army had been carried out that was a threat to the functioning of the UK state.
Indeed the British Parliament has not published the Article 51 Letter.
This all suggests the whole story was very recently concocted by the British Prime Minister, perhaps in his car on the short drive to Parliament, in what is certainly purely for 'news' media headlines.
The British regime are not really bumping off their own mercenaries.
QUEEN SUB 'PLOT'
There are more holes than a sieve with the subsequent 'news' media story trying to link the alleged assassinations on August 21st 2015 with an alleged VJ 'Terror' plot on errr...August 15th 2015 that never materialized.
In fact what the British government and 'news' media did not like on August 21st 2015 was this:
This is because when the cacophony of war propaganda is all said and done, it is legal challenges in courts of law that expose their lies, and stop war, they really fear.
assassinating someone after a foiled 'terror' plot ?
The great pretender, the old crone on the throne Ms Saxe-Coburg, does however have considerable form slaughtering civilians anywhere for money, while plotting against the Parliament Square Peace Campaigners.
may 25th 2010: two veterans 'seized': 2,000,000 million civilians murdered
A well documented real plot by the old crone on the throne in the British High Court against us descended into farce when her Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger and gardener, the Mayor of London Boris Johnson could not 'prosecute' us for ignoring their High Court 'injunction', because they were illegally denying us legal representation.
april 2011: cutting through the legal farce
Another plot that was discovered around August 21st 2015 which will be linked, was the Mayor of London fraudulently trying to stop our using our display while he and the City of London incredibly misrepresent themselves as our Parliament Square Peace Campaign as though we do not exist.
4. The British Prime Minister’s claims about the governance of the internationally recognized sovereign state of Syria are in every practical and legal sense a number of red herrings that are irrelevant.
5. It is a self-evident matter of fact that the British government could not even have ‘reasonably believed’ there was an ‘imminent threat’ to...Britain from a British national...in Syria.
6. Indeed it is a well known matter of fact and law, that the British regime have invented many so called ‘plots’ over the years that have turned out to be false, while using agent provocateurs and other agents of state to conduct attacks on civilians.
7. The British government falsely claim they not the Syrian government can decide who can and cannot have lethal weapons to use in Syria, so in every legal and practical sense the British government support terrorists in Syria, who fly under many monikers including the 'Free Syria Army' and 'Islamic State'.
9. The Prime Minister has not made out his case that the British government lawfully conducted an extra-judicial killing of any British national in ‘self-defence’.
Indeed the British Prime Minister is saying the British government can just murder any British national they like, anywhere, which is not true.
The fact anyone may 'believe' whatever the British 'Parliament' and 'news' media tells them is irrelevant.
The reality is the British government is trying to make out the case they can murder any British national so they can murder any Syrian national because the only peaceful solution standing in his way is a court of law.
"The fact that this matter reached the attorney general and the prime minister may suggest that other government lawyers were not prepared to sanction this strike." [Hmmm...]
10. In all the circumstances the latest British Attorney General et al have only demonstrated their criminal intent to knowingly deceive the public about much, including facts and civilian society’s rule of law.
[NB: We do have unprecedented practical experience of the far from legal system of British Justice, who work hand in hand with 'news' media, through our endlessly winning malicious prosecutions brought by the British Parliament]
THE TRUE FACTS:
A considerable time before the war on Syria began and the NATO mercenaries called the Free Syrian Army and fake ‘Islamic State’ had even been dreamed up:
There is no argument that Brian Haw did more to keep the wars in the minds of the public and government, than any other person in Britain.
brian haw began our parliament square peace campaign on june 2nd 2001
1. On July 19th 2009 the now British Prime Minister David Cameron did in legal terms publicly make a threat to murder our Parliament Square Peace Campaign civilian resistance to NATO.
Cameron has not and did not ever intend to withdraw his statement to ‘remove’ us by any means.
"...Mr Cameron [current UK PM] today told Sky News' Sunday Live a future Tory government would [illegally use the entire apparatus of the violent corporate state to] take steps to have it [Parliament Square Peace Campaign] removed...
"... `Enough is enough'.
There is no excuse for any British Prime Minister to order the 'hit' of any peace campaigner.
The Prime Minister's statement today repeats and extends what much evidence already proves was a lethal threat against us 2009.
2. This lethal threat was made because the Tory party illegally voted to invade Iraq too and knew the Labour Party Prime Minister Tony Blair had put out a ‘hit’ on me at some time in January 2007 (that may well have ‘officially’ extended to other members of our civilian resistance to NATO) by illegally giving Special Branch a “licence to kill” me.
06.09.2015 A QUIET REVOLUTIONARY: EU REFERENDUM ’POLL’ SHOWS ANTI-WAR VOTE IN MASSIVE LEAD & LAWLESS NATO DESPERATE FOR UK...CIVILIANS TO LEAVE EU...COURTS
3. (The ‘licence to kill’ was revealed in an unlawful ‘arrest’ on January 31st 2007, in a case I won on August 30th 2007, along with several other cases. My own stated intention had always been to, for example, repeal bogus war on terror corporate legislation)
4. On September 3rd & 4th 2009, the British Prime Minister at that time Gordon Brown therefore sought to ‘pip’ Cameron to that post so to speak, by trying to first murder me at Belgravia Police Station in London which failed because they could not then murder Brian Haw too, who heard something going on.
The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police has refused without lawful excuse to this date, to disclose that CCTV that they confirmed they had been forced to retain, to myself.
5. It is of course unprecedented that three successive British Prime Ministers are legally speaking in the frame for trying to murder any member or all of a tiny group of civilian resistance to NATO, because there was the threat of too much...peace and justice breaking out !!!!
6. In legal terms a jury could only conclude, all the accumulated medical evidence etc proves the British government murdered Brian Haw, because the cumulative actions of the state that led to his death on June 18th 2011, can all be shown to be deliberate.
The reasons for the seriously criminal actions of the British state towards law abiding civilians are very straightforward.
7. The entire British Parliament have always been illegally trying to stop our own law abiding civilian resistance to NATO having access to the High Court to put the British regime on trial before a High Court jury.
8. This is because a High Court jury in Britain (which is part of the European legal system) is one obvious route to roll back the illegitimate power the state has illegally seized, by repealing legislation and stopping war.
There is a very very big difference between our own law abiding civilian resistance to NATO and the observational complaints of ‘politics’ and ‘news’ media etc.
"...When the press backed the war in Iraq, when both sides of the house backed the war in Iraq, Brian stood up to the Government," she [Tucker] says. Pink Dr Martens and 40 [now 48 unlawful] arrests notwithstanding, she has an easy-going charm.
"And he turned out to be right, didn't he? If you believe in democracy, Brian is what democracy looks like...
...she and Mr Haw have been dragged to and from police cells and the courts in increasingly 'complex' attempts by the authorities to get rid of them...On 9 May, the latest court case...was pushed back to October. She is currently concerned about new legislation outlawing 24-hour protest. It would not be the first law seemingly tailor-made to evict them. If they are moved on, where would she go? "You can move us on, but to where? You'd have to bury our bodies. Either you believe in democracy, or you don't. We are living it "
We have already proved in 2011 that a very small group of civilians with no prior legal training whatsoever can force the repeal of post 9/11 bogus war on terror corporate legislation, so obviously larger groups of civilians can also repeal much if they are genuine too.
"...Barbara Tucker, who has been [resisting NATO] protesting in Parliament Square for 10 years [7 years] uninterrupted and for the last 103 days without shelter, said talk of a loophole was a red herring as the law [legislation used by Wheeler's..husband] itself was invalid.
Ms Tucker said: “If she [Marina Wheeler] was a real human rights lawyer she would be saying nobody should be arrested, pulled up before the courts and lose their job for [resisting] protesting against this government.."
It remains a matter of fact, that the entire British Parliament have no recognized defence in law to the Iraq War.
There is not a single member of the entire British Parliament who could go on the witness stand before a jury in the British High Court and claim they ‘reasonably believed’ UN Resolution 1441 gave the British government any legal grounds to even vote, let alone to vote to unilaterally act ‘on behalf’ of the UN to invade Iraq.
It is not that any MP could simply claim they were lied to by Tony Blair, because the entire British Parliament lied to a whole world of civilians by claiming they had any ‘right’ to vote.
labour war criminals like hilary benn, harman & co
The entire British Parliament and all the British corporate ’news’ media who are stacked to the rafters with their own lawyers too, all knew this, which proves just how truly huge, yet simple the deceit that knowingly led to the illegal Iraq war is.
this evidence of their subverting the rule of law and democracy was stolen by the metropolitan police on august 30th 2011
It is impossible for NATO regimes to use what are effectively teams of Gladio style operations, to keep marching civilians to the top of the hill and back down again home, without stopping in for example the High Court before a jury.
The Iraq War has irrevocably changed Britain because the millions of civilians who marched against the war have not changed their minds, and indeed millions more civilians have come to understand more about the widespread criminality of the British regime.
It is civilian society’s rule of law that exists to protect life, that is not for sale by or to any other.
9. The British Parliament only have a very small administrative role that does not extend to what really is lethal military rule over civilians in many countries.
uncouth, slovenly uncivilized war criminals
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.