BRITISH PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON WILL TRY & HOLD ILLEGAL OCTOBER SYRIA WAR VOTE, WITHOUT ANY LEGAL GROUNDS ? (07.09.2015)
In legal terms it would be illegal (and in particular after growing public awareness) to even hold any vote on going to war in Syria, without first publicly disclosing any legal grounds, they will never have.
It isn't just the result of any vote that would be illegal, but also even having any vote, without legal grounds would be illegal.
law brings the british regime of all political shades out in a cold sweat
The great hoax the entire British Parliament and news media played in waging the illegal Iraq War, was a lie they all knew.
Not a single member of the British Parliament could actually go on a witness stand before a High Court jury and claim they 'reasonably believed' the British Parliament could vote to unilaterally invade Iraq 'on behalf' of the UN.
The Iraq War lie is that big and that simple.
I have personally seen the Attorney General who at that time was Lord Goldsmith go pale over what he did.
murdoch is up to his ears with criminality with his syria war propaganda
I don't think anyone has even heard a peep out of the latest Attorney General Jeremy Wright MP over the Syria war vote.
'persuade' Labour MP's
The last Attorney General Dominic Grieve who we had several personal run in's with that we won had to resign. He was bizarrely trying to prosecute me over court recordings showing state corruption, which the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police's bent brief was spitting at us over too !!
Grieve was trying to use one of those crazy pieces of legislation where it was a slam dunk we could only win in the High Court, with even better, binding rulings, showing that a contemporaneous record of proceedings is not a Contempt of Court.
All you have to do is ask the Judge hearing such a Contempt of Court case if you can record it too, and if he says yes, then bingo you have clearly won, and if he says no, then he is biased, and you move on to a Higher Court.
Anyway more importantly that bent Attorney General could not produce any legal grounds for a war in Syria, in 2013 either, and nor could he pretend he didn't read our website etc, because that is why I got a threatening letter from him in October 2012.
It is the nature of British 'politics' that when dirt accumulates, they try and keep it from catching up by resigning etc, usually to the House of Lords.
The Syrian government by contrast are lawfully defending the majority of Syrian civilians who have always lived in the major cities in western Syria.
Damascus, SANA – Syria took a scathing swipe at Britain on Sunday over the British position on Syria and the latest statements made by its Foreign Secretary, condemning Britain’s "political hypocrisy".
In two letters it addressed to the UN Secretary General and Chairman of the Security Council, Foreign and Expatriates Ministry dismissed the escalation in the “brazen” attitude of some British officials on the situation in Syria, including those of the Foreign Office.
The British officials, the letters said, are meddling in issues that are not their specialty according to the international law and the UN Charter.
The British government, they said, has no right to peach to others about democracy, human rights and combating terrorism when it itself has employed all its capabilities and brought into play its “colonialist experience” in providing all forms of support, including financially, militarily, politically and media-wise, to the terrorist organizations in Syria.
The fact that the British government has sent terrorists and extremists to Syria, such as its national “John, the ISIS Slaughterer”, and harbored over tens of years others like Abu Qatada and Omar Abdel-Rahman reveals Britain’s “political hypocrisy and the falseness of its claims about promoting democracy, fighting terrorism and protecting human rights,” according to the letters.
The Foreign Ministry said the obvious aim of Britain sending letters to the Security Council, like that with the number S/641, 2015, and the clear implications of the British Foreign Secretary’s statements can only have one meaning; providing direct support to the terrorist organizations.
It described as “outrageous” the attitude of the British officials who are denying Syria’s right to fighting terrorism off its people and driving imported terrorists, including from Britain, away.
This, the letters said, contradicts the countries’ duty of defending their territories and people under the UN Charter and in accordance with the international law and the Security Council resolutions.
Citing an example that quite reveals Britain’s political hypocrisy and double standard policy, the Ministry reminded of Prime Minister David Cameron’s statements back on August 11, 2011 when he threatened to use the force of army to stop protests, where three people were killed and over 750 others were arrested.
“We will not let any phony concerns about human rights get in the way of the publication of these pictures and the arrest of these individuals,” the letters cited Cameron as saying.
It said that Britain should rather preach to itself, especially that it is a permanent member state of the UN, before preaching to others since many people, including of the region’s countries and those of Asia, the Middle East and Latin America, are up till now suffering from the colonialist policies of Britain and other colonialist states.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.