WHAT UN ARTICLE 51 LETTER WILL UK PARLIAMENT PRODUCE IN ADVANCE OF SYRIA WAR VOTE ? [WHILE FRANCE DREAMS OF UN RESOLUTION TO 'NEUTRALIZE' ASSAD] (27.08.2015)
The British Parliament have been acting very strangely lately, what with suddenly stashing our campaign property they have stolen that they can never prosecute us over in the Museum of London to try and stop us using it !!
This is combined with the Chilcot military war propaganda and the whole Corbyn STWC apologia for Genocide in Iraq roadshow, whose common interest like that of the rest of the British Parliament, remains wanting to avoid any jury trials over the Iraq War.
...and what would be the...UN Article 51 letter for the...war on..Syria 'vote' ?
All that sweeping under the carpet still does not explain how the British Parliament are actually going to be able to have a vote on invading Syria in September to fly all around the...desert, when they cannot even come up with an Article 51 letter to the UN.
This leaves them in a far, far worse position than even the US regime who were struggling and had to pull a number of duck and dives to pull a fast one that has got them no-where with the Khorasan lie that they finally came up with.
The US regime could not put the Khorasan lie before the US Congress so they waited until they had sloped off.
26.08.2015 PRESIDENT ASSAD: TERRORISTS ARE THE TRUE TOOL OF ISRAELI AGGRESSION
President Assad correctly points out that foreign interference by mercenary terrorists is the major problem Syria faces.
"The foreign secretary, Philip Hammond added ... the Chilcot inquiry is and it quite properly must remain, an independent inquiry...a decision over whether to extend British airstrikes in Iraq to Syria should not have to await the outcome of the inquiry..."
Meanwhile Hollande was muttering away about getting a UN resolution to try and 'neutralize' President Assad which is obviously never going to happen.
“En Syrie, le monde a mis beaucoup de temps à réagir, trop de temps. A l’été 2012 la France avait donné l’alerte, et s’était d’ailleurs dès le départ, déclarée en soutien de l’opposition syrienne. J’étais même le premier à la considérer comme la seule représentante légitime du peuple syrien.
Un an plus tard, nous étions prêts à punir un régime qui avait utilisé, il n’y avait aucun doute là-dessus, des armes chimiques contre sa population. L’inaction de la communauté internationale, après qu’une ligne rouge a été délibérément franchie, a coûté cher, très cher, Daech, qui n’existait pas alors sous cette forme, en Syrie, s’est installé, et Bachar EL-ASSAD a continué à massacrer son peuple, il en donne encore, hélas, quelques illustrations.
Que devons-nous faire ? Nous devons réduire les emprises terroristes sans préserver ASSAD, car les deux ont partie liée, et en même temps il nous faut chercher une transition politique en Syrie, c’est une nécessité. Le Conseil de sécurité l’a reconnu en adoptant la semaine dernière une déclaration, c’était la première depuis 2 ans. Elle va dans la bonne direction et c’est un pas important. La Russie s’y est associée, et un dialogue peut donc être engagé. Il faut en fixer les conditions.
La première c’est la neutralisation de Bachar EL-ASSAD, la seconde c’est d’offrir des garanties solides à toutes les forces de l’opposition modérée, notamment sunnite et kurde, et de préserver les structures étatiques et l’unité de la Syrie. Enfin, la dernière condition, sans doute celle qui sera décisive, c’est de mêler toutes les parties prenantes à la solution. Je pense aux pays du Golfe. Je pense aussi à l’Iran. Je pense à la Turquie, qui doit s’impliquer dans la lutte contre Daech, et engager, ou plutôt reprendre, le dialogue avec les Kurdes.”
...harshly criticized Hollande as the least popular French president among all his predecessors, one “that failure clings to all of his policies”...
...Hollande “should rather lecture himself and come to conclusions, perhaps he might preserve what remains of France’s reputation in the world.”
...the French President’s statements are the product of “a colonialist mentality that allows itself to hijack the peoples’ decision and control their choices in service of its cheap material interests and accepts to sell its position and values in the oil market.”
The French government...should know that “if it would pursue this stance, we would not accept any French role in the political solution.”
...the Syrian people are now more committed to maintaining Syria’s sovereignty and independent national decision that any time before and will confront any attempts at interfering in their national choices."
The reality is NATO could invent all manner of 'flight paths' across the Syrian desert that are still not going to take them anywhere near being able to bomb the major civilian cities in western Syria where most civilians have always lived.
26.08.2015 FARS NEWS AGENCY: RUSSIA BOOSTS SUPPORT FOR SYRIAN ARMY WITH SATELLITE IMAGERY
Indeed the US et al are simply not going to be able to publicly keep recruiting mercenaries either.
President Assad isn't taking early retirement and European public opinion could never support lethally armed foreign backed mercenaries trying to overthrow President Assad.
RELATED:
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives
