QUESTION: WHY DO US & TURKEY WANT A 'NO-FLY ZONE' IN SYRIA, WHEN THE 'ENEMY' DOESN’T OWN A SINGLE AIRCRAFT ??!! (25.07.2015)
There are no legal grounds for the US & Turkey to try and impose a 'no fly zone' in Syria, because the enemy in Syria doesn't have any aircraft.
Therefore the only possible true purpose behind the latest US & Turkey ruse doing the rounds would involve the US & Turkish military illegally trying to savagely bomb their way into carving out a 'capital' for their mercenary terrorists in Syria, that they would preferably want to be called... Aleppo.
it is getting difficult for nato to disguise who the real 'islamic state' is...
...the 'enemy' do not own a single aircraft, let alone have an air-force ?
The US & Turkey could only want to illegally carve out a 'capital' for their bought and paid for NATO mercenaries.
"...Sources emphasized they have opted to call it the “ISIL-free zone”...this aerial protection will not be classified as an effort to build a no-fly zone over Syrian airspace. Together with aerial strikes, Turkish long-range artillery units will also be used if necessary
...The [illegal] plan 'crafted' by Ankara and Washington 'foresees' the deployment of FSA [terrorist] units [who are trying to illegally overthrow the Syrian government] to this area..."
The tortuous linguistic gymnastics of unknown 'sources' cannot disguise what in legal terms could only be called an illegal 'no fly zone' solely targeting the...Syrian government air force, because the purported 'enemy', the 'Islamic State' does not have any aircraft.
That would be direct evidence of the US & Turkey waging a war of aggression of obvious divide and rule that only involves slaughtering any Syrian civilian who does not want to be or live under the military rule of bought and paid for NATO mercenaries.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.