NATO FACE DEFEAT IN SYRIA AS UK ‘FOREIGN’ SECRETARY CONFIRMS PRIMARY MILITARY OBJECTIVE IS TO OVERTHROW SYRIAN GOVERNMENT (NOT ‘ISLAMIC STATE’) (22.07.2015)
Yesterday's comments by the UK 'Foreign' Secretary which have not been reported by ‘news’ media (following on from the UK 'Defence' Secretary’ and the British Parliament’s ramblings) prove that the military ‘power’ of NATO has come up against and been defeated in the NATO War on Syria, by civilian society’s eponymous rule of law.
The British ‘Foreign’ Secretary has confirmed that all the lethally armed foreign backed opposition in Syria want to first and foremost smash the Syrian government (which is not going to happen) to successfully grandstand on the international ‘political’ stage with all their other Genocidal war propaganda that is designed to occupy Syria.
The UK 'Foreign' Secretary et al's weasel words on the Parliamentary record on July 21st 2015 on pages 11 & 17 are:
Mr Hammond: "The overall plan in Syria remains to see a political transition in the regime to a Government which has legitimacy and buy-in from the majority of groups in Syria, that can then take the fight to [whoever is then deemed to be] Daesh...
Q31 Mr Baron: With respect, Foreign Secretary, ISIL/Daesh, al-Nusra and al-Qaeda were on the rebels’ side right at the beginning. Their scope may have changed, but they were there on the rebel side....
Mr Hammond: ...At no time was there a proposal in general terms to bomb Assad"
Mr Hammond et al still face insurmountable legal difficulties publicly explaining any specific 'proposals' to bomb President Assad, the rest of the Syrian government or any unarmed civilian.
In practical and legal terms, it is significant that NATO does not support the Syrian government's fight against the fake 'Islamic State' in Syria, when any sentient human being would support the Syrian government fighting the 'Islamic State'.
This makes it important to address the fact that NATO and it’s allies refusal to call the fake ‘Islamic State’ what it calls itself, is not out of any religious sensitivities, but rather to avoid having to proscribe and prosecute all manner of named and lethally armed individuals and their true funding sources which are NATO and it’s allies.
This is the same as the US hiding behind the ‘Khorasan’ ruse in Syria.
All the NATO propaganda in the world is not however going to change the legal facts on the global ground:
a) that the Syrian government are the internationally recognized government of the internationally recognized state of Syria.
b) the Syrian government are acting lawfully defending the major Syrian cities from all lethally armed foreign backed mercenaries, whatever banner any may claim to fly under on any given day.
The legal reality is NATO and it’s allies mutterings about not recognizing borders to try and use air strikes to create buffer zones is not the will of any civilian population and cannot happen or lead to seizing major cities and overthrowing the Syrian government.
As long as the Syrian government remain, NATO propaganda fails.
There is no evidence of Raqqa being anything other than a Daily Mail advertisement for an adolescent British holiday resort for foreign NATO mercenaries, akin to a Magaluf for fake Muslims or frankly the British military in Cyprus and elsewhere.
The British Parliament’s most recent inflammatory posturing that boiled down to they can militarily do whatever they like in Syria by hiding behind the US, is not as they know, practically or legally sustainable anywhere.
It is not really the case that the UK military are operating under US command and control.
RAF keeping a protective eye on their fake 'islamic state'
Then there is err war criminal Lord Ken MacDonald's (former Director of Public Persecutions) 'censured' ?? 'Reprieve' email that is an obvious fake:
the war criminal lord ken macdonald (former director of public persecutions) and chair of fake ngo 'reprieve' would like people to believe that reprieve took from june 15th until july 17th to publish their fake correspondence
'Reprieve' are a fake NGO running interference for NATO mercenaries like Begg, Belhaj and Co.
(Indeed it is very well documented that Lord Ken MacDonald carried out what was quite an unprecedented personal vendetta against our civilian resistance to NATO, over a number of years)
Much of what poses as alternative 'news' media actually just regurgitates mainstream 'news' media, while claiming to be 'investigative'. No credible source in the UK would take at face value what Ken MacDonald who is a) a war criminal and b) former Director of Public Prosecutions, who is now c) a Lord (as in the unelected House of Lords) claimed, as 'Chair' of Reprieve, without looking at what he is really trying to do, for the British regime.
No genuine human rights body is going to invite the likes of Lord Ken MacDonald or Anthony Salz on board.
the fake ngo 'reprieve': circles within circles like Rothschild's Anthony Salz who is also on the Guardian Board's Scott Trust, and so on...
The fake UK Stop the War Coalition and their 'Labour' MP Corbyn similarly do not stand in solidarity with civilians across Europe, trying to throw NATO out of Europe too.
just another 'politician': no solidarity with civilians anywhere
16.06.2013 SYRIA: FAO: ATTORNEY GENERAL, FOREIGN SECRETARY, HOME SECRETARY, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
The idea that NATO can occupy Iraq to smash the Syrian government is equally untenable in any practical or legal reality.
(It is a matter of fact on public record in courts of law, that our own civilian resistance to NATO, has lived and become 'experts' on the 'panoply' of the British Queen & Parliament's attempts to subvert all known 'land law')
What is a reality is that everyone has seen that NATO is only able to hire all manner of opportunistic mercenaries who will never have military air cover to try and illegally overthrow the Syrian government.
Of course it is a practical difficulty for NATO to keep trying to recruit opportunistic mercenaries who are never going to have military air cover to overthrow the Syrian government.
No credible lethally armed Syrian ‘Opposition’ is ever going to emerge.
not a word of the daily mail daily dose of 'site' et al nato propaganda in france
NATO propaganda has been predicated on ignoring the demographic concentration of Syrian civilians in the western part of the country.
nothing has changed from the days of sykes/picot divide and rule using the sectarian canard that disguises the demographic concentration of Syrian people live in the west of the country...
Most people in Syria have proved that first and foremost they live by and unsurprisingly support civilian society’s rule of law, unlike Genocidal NATO and it’s allies, who everyone does know include the ‘Islamic State’.
NATO are never going to be able to go to the UN or more importantly any court of law, and ever say anything different.
Contrary to claims by a Russian journalist, the facts prove European 'royalty' and 'politics' were focused on using World Wars One & Two to gain control of the Middle East, not the former Soviet Union.
The very fact that the British ‘Foreign’ Secretary has articulated on the Parliamentary record, as the British regime typically slope off for their summer holidays, that they oppose the Syrian government fighting the ‘Islamic State’ now, has buried the most foul NATO War propaganda the world has ever seen, forever.
Gaddafi obviously allowed himself to 'believe' a little too much, that the British regime had 'retreated' from their intention to violently overthrow him to take over Libya too.
The British regime's use of the word 'political' has only ever been deployed to try and disguise their own criminality.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.