DAVID ANDERSON ‘QUESTION OF TRUST’ TERROR REGIME REPORT IS 373 PAGE WASTE OF TIME, MONEY & HUMAN...LIVES IN NATO WAR ON SYRIA (11.06.2015)
The NATO War on Syria only continues because NATO ‘governments’ and ‘news’ media are criminally trying to pretend that not all the lethally armed foreign backed terrorists trying to illegally overthrow the Syrian government, are mercenary terrorists.
The latest terror ‘surveillance’ report is a 373 page complete and utter waste of public time, money and far, far worse, human lives, when civilians only need immediate access to a High Court jury to expose with facts, evidence and law, the terrorists are the Genocidal regime, to hold them legally accountable.
the nato terror state: the genocidal british regime do not have any recognised 'defence' to the evidence of this wholly illegal 'surveillance operation' on april 10th 2013, using 'police' with what could not be a more obviously fake number of 666
THE REAL LONDON ILLEGAL 'SURVEILLANCE' WORLD OF 666.
The Terror regime blah di blah and all the fake ‘human rights’ NGO’s and ‘news’ media gate-keeping with endless hypothetical mumbo jumbo, only disguises that civilians remain legally entitled to immediate access to a High Court jury to expose and challenge the regime’s lies to hold them legally accountable.
[I dare say Lord Rothermere & Co's Daily Mail readers et al might splutter over their cornflakes far more if they knew that what their Genocidal regime is really doing running around London conducting illegal 'surveillance operations' with 'police' wearing the obviously fake number of 666.
With the sole purpose of trying to prevent law abiding civilians holding the regime legally accountable in courts of law.
I am quite sure the Daily Mail comments columns would have a field day arguing over what the purpose of using the number 666 was, apart from it obviously being seriously illegal.
A lot of things can be said about 666 et al but what can never be said is that they 'reasonably believed' what they were doing was in any way lawful...how many more 'police' were hiding in backstreets waiting for us to resist ???? in the 'pre-planned' police operation (they always hunt at least 10 filth to 1 civilian for 'arrests') that had lured us to the high court on utterly false pretences when 'hearing dates' etc can and should be agreed via...email]
16.01.2012: the filth always hunt in huge packs that are not always immediately obvious
The MSM and so called 'alternative'...'news' media bears no relationship to what is really going on.
It has been obvious for some time the regime do not have any legal powers at all to spy on unarmed civilian resistance, and worse with the specific purpose of trying to prevent the regime being held legally accountable before a High Court jury.
it is not a 'question of trust', it is a matter of civilians using civilian society's rule of law to hold the regime legally accountable in courts of law.
373 pages of purely criminal nato propaganda
this criminal nato propaganda is not stopping the genocidal nato war on syrian civilians
it's not really 'bulk collection' because minister's and senior civil servants are illegally concealing many smoking guns
It serves no justifiable purpose to write 373 pages of complete rubbish when the only important point is civilians having access to a High Court jury to challenge the lies with real evidence of illegal surveillance.
We do not need the 'confirm or deny' of the British intelligence services to prove to a jury with evidence the British regime have always been illegally 'spying' on us.
The 666 case is only one marvelously simple example of quite straightforward and very widespread illegal 'surveillance' of civilians going about their lawful business.
The NATO regime cannot work out how to prevent corporate companies having to attend court to give evidence/explain their role in illegal surveillance of unarmed civilian resistance, which is an inevitable part of any legal proceedings.
"voluntary": the regime cannot 'comply' companies to retain data themselves, let alone to pass to the criminal regime, because that only ends up with a lot of corporate red faces in courts too, because the regime have never been spying on what are their own lethally armed terrorists.
Civilians are not interested in the regime and their propagandists lies that insult anyone's intelligence, but instead insist on access to a High Court jury to put evidence of the regimes crimes on the record to hold them legally accountable.
The war mongering Guardian typically wheel out all the usual NATO gatekeepers, like Liberty, Amnesty International, David Davis et al, who do not in any way represent law abiding civilians or oppose illegal NATO Wars.
The proper place for legal scrutiny of the British regime is in a court of law, not amongst pages of self-serving revenue raising propaganda.
it is obviously civilians rights the entire badge and label NATO brigade want to violently smash
These imbeciles in the MSM insult civilians intelligence, which can see the MSM know exactly what lies they are publishing for their own financial benefit.
Recently NATO have sought to try and disguise that all the terrorists trying to illegally overthrow the Syrian government are their terrorists, by trying to incredibly suggest that Al-Qaeda (for example) is not so bad.
This is because:
a) in London it is very well known all the Al-Qaeda terrorists are agents of the British state none of us would ever touch with a barge pole
b) the British regime want to re-frame who are terrorists to try and invent legal grounds they will never find to invade Syria.
The Guardian invention that Al-Qaeda are not so bad compared to the fake 'Islamic State' is supposed to suggest:
a) that Al-Qaeda are 'Islamic' rather than just plain old bought and paid for NATO mercenary terrorists
b) that if Al-Qaeda is not so bad then the FSA and al-Nusra are not so 'bad' and so on and so forth to try and convince the public that some (NATO) terrorists are okay.
In legal terms it remains both fact and law, that all the foreign backed lethally armed bought and paid for mercenaries trying to illegally overthrow the Syrian government are terrorists whatever banner they might claim to fly under.
NATO only ever has a conversation with itself through the entire panoply of war mongering gatekeepers.
The regime are the terrorists and worse war criminals routinely falsely accusing civilians so that the regime can keep bombing any civilians who resist.
'transport' for london terror: one long cycle of 'police' terror
One speeding fine and one parking ticket my whole life before this same regime repeatedly falsely accused this civilian of being a criminal and suspected terrorist, for the sole purpose of trying to prevent their being held legally accountable for Genocide in a court of law.
The British regime who mock civilian life and civilian society's rule of law serve no identifiable justifiable purpose whatsoever.
Most seriously, as the civilian massacre in Palmyra, Syria proved, NATO spy satellites in Syria are watching their own terrorists who NATO are aiding and abetting.
NATO would like people to forget that it was the Iranian revolution who threw out NATO, as indeed Hezbollah largely did in Lebanon.
The NATO War on Syria 'did not just happen'.
The terrorists are being paid by NATO, out of taxpayers money, so criminal propagandists like Murdoch who promote them, make...money.
"...war did not just happen it was planned and prepared for over a long period of time and with no small skill and cunning....
...the entire structure of offices and officials was dedicated to the criminal purposes and committed to the use of the criminal methods planned by these defendants and their co-conspirators...
...always contemplated not merely overcoming current opposition but exterminating elements which could not be reconciled with its philosophy of the state.
We have here the surviving top politicians, militarists, financiers, diplomats, administrators, and propagandists... Who was responsible for these crimes if they were not?
.....this declaration of the law has taken them by surprise....they really are surprised that there is any such thing as law.
International law, natural law, any law at all was to these men simply a propaganda device to be invoked when it helped and to be ignored when it would condemn what they wanted to do.
...the ultimate step in avoiding wars, which are inevitable in a system of international lawlessness, is to make statesmen responsible to law...[Nuremberg Trials]
shameful city of westminster metropolitan and city of london filth desperately trying to prevent civilian access to high court juries to hold genocidal british regime legally accountable
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.