GUARDIAN, ELLSBERG & DRAKE LIE ABOUT US PATRIOT 'ACT' BEING FIRST & ONLY LEGISLATIVE REPEAL SINCE 9/11 TO TRY & DISGUISE WHO NATO SPIES ON (04.06.2015)
It is illuminating that in the old controlled Guardian, Ellsberg & Drake world of NATO propaganda, they feel the need to have churlishly as they well know, dishonestly claimed that the Patriot 'Act' is the first and only legislative 'change', since 9/11.
In fact our small group of ordinary label free civilian resistance with no legal 'training' whatsoever secured our first and the only real repeal since 9/11 in 2011 (no thanks to the schmucks in 'news' media who applauded our violent arrests, because they want to protect their criminal NATO propaganda)
the real deal began before 9/11: brian haw started our civilian resistance to nato on june 2nd 2001 when genocide was already being committed with the admitted murder of 500,000 iraqi children before 9/11.
Obviously NATO do not want to headline that civilians with no legal training whatsoever can repeal legislation that corporate interests including 'news' media were behind.
The repeal that we achieved also exposes who is really under illegal state surveillance and why.
It is those of us who are unarmed civilian resistance to NATO who have always been under their illegal 'surveillance'.
In the words of (for example) David Cameron, he won the corporate vote by telling Murdoch he would use the entire apparatus of the state to try and smash us.
In legal terms it is as seriously illegal as it gets for a politician to publicly make a statement that they will use public office for such a purpose, which the British regime paid off every 'human rights' law firm in London to 'overlook'.
The only difference between the US Patriot 'Act' and the Freedom 'Act' is that the US regime will simply file pro-forma applications to achieve the same end, so there is no identifiable change.
The obvious reason there is no change in the US is because no civilian in the US (or anywhere else the US spy on) has ever been given access to a court with a real claim, while all the usual suspect gatekeepers at the fake NGO's/'Human Rights' in the US/UK warble on to camera.
Our first legislative repeal of 2005 legislation means that no-one needs the 'permission' of the British regime to expose evidence of Genocide (although only we would get chilly until we get a High Court jury to secure our second repeal over living 24/7 civilian resistance)
I am quite sure that 2011 comes quite a bit before 2015 :)
The repeal came about because during the course of the entire apparatus of the state having illegally denied me access to a High Court jury since 2006 in 40 & unlawful arrests, they stupidly took me/us to the High Court in 2010/2011 in not very 'civil' actions, that were pretty ghastly.
The 'news' media endlessly slagged us off.
It was in the High Court, I eventually managed to take the opportunity to slap them with a still live, mother of all counterclaims.
The British regime couldn't repeal the legislation fast enough (despite petulantly 'decreeing' that I could then freeze to death, which it is recorded that the entire British regime were happy to watch while illegally denying me access to a High Court jury to secure a second repeal)
The only way their legislative frauds stand is by illegally denying civilians access to courts.
When the NATO propaganda of 'government' and 'news' media need to lie about something so simple as civilian access to courts of law, for no other reason than to try and protect their 'system', neither they nor their 'system' serve any justifiable purpose.
Securing the first repeal was no thanks at all to all the schmucks in fake London 'Human Rights' law firms either.
It was by pure happenstance that I bought a civil procedure 'law' book for 50p at a second-hand book-fair in Russell Square.
The truth is far more real than the contrived fakery of the criminal underworld of NATO War propaganda.
It is only very clear how the many layered labels of corporate gatekeepers despise and fear civilians rolling back the corporate legislative state to it's administrative core.
“This is the first time since 9/11 that any publicly known legislation has changed,” he says [in London].
pure nato propaganda where unlike civilians, old mitch the politician, much like nato propagandists, weren't really...trying
Talk about a bunch of NATO propagandists spitting all over Brian's life, with their lies that only try and disguise who NATO is spying on.
Of course all legislative frauds are 'publicly known' because they are published so that civilians are unlawfully arrested, prosecuted and convicted using them for goodness sakes.
repealed: a snapshot of illegal state surveillance of the real civilian deal who unlike 'journalists' does the real 'time' to prove it is the Genocidal NATO state legislating to try and cover up it's war crimes.
(The small 'snapshot' above was 'disclosed' when the Crown Persecution Service incredibly published a seriously libelous article on their CPS website about me, being this really serious criminal. So in the put up/shut up, they actually tried to use the rubbish above as 'evidence' of my criminality, before they were forced to shut up and remove the deeply offensive article)
The NATO propaganda of the Guardian et al, is continuing to try and peddle the lie, that civilians do not need access to courts of law, because they do not want civilians to repeal bucket-loads of fraudulent legislation.
The NATO 'government' and 'news' media spin that they can just write whatever vicious lie they like down on a piece of paper to do whatever they like to other people, while civilians should not have redress is foul.
It is a self evident reality that when all civilians realize exactly how the corporate state illegally seizes 'power' through legislative frauds that can be repealed, that 'power' ends for both corporate 'government' and their 'news' media propagandists.
It is truly shocking the sheer amount of corporate money behind most NATO legislation.
The NATO corporate state's greatest fear is civilians upholding civilian society's rule of law to take a sledgehammer to their legislative frauds and put their criminal NATO propaganda and illegal wars on trial before (in Britain) a High Court jury.
The old style stale and revoltingly cheap and vulgar small talk of both MSM and alternative 'news' media chewing over civilian people's lives as though it depends on who you vote for and so on, frankly has no place in decent and civilized society.
It is no secret that I hold 'journalism' (as practiced in NATO countries) in absolute contempt.
Everyone who hides behind the label of 'journalism' assumes some sort of 'special' rights over other civilians, and worse to say whatever they like about other people's lives, which as a starting point is completely dishonest.
NATO war propaganda really is criminal because it intends to cause the most serious identifiable and deliberate harm, which is death.
The real (legal) question is, what is it that is really different between two human beings where one calls themselves a 'journalist' and another doesn't, when they both speak or write ?
There is no difference and the 'journalist' does not have special rights because of a label.
The more 'news' media lie the quicker they will fall.
The only responsible true public discourse about life takes place within the legal framework of civilian society's rule of law.
Twenty four seven civilian resistance to NATO must be normalized as the part of civilian society it has always been.
A new public discourse is slowly being forged that will consign criminal NATO war propaganda and their illegal wars to the dustbin of history.
Brian began our campaign on June 2nd 2001, that has never been some fly by night, stage managed media circus and so on, but is instead in for what is obviously a very long haul of working very seriously to try and save civilian lives.
The video above exposes, how given a choice, civilians do not back 'politicians', 'religion' the 'army' or 'journalism' (which is why the schmucks at Channel Four who were disgracefully making a joke about Genocide changed their rules after Brian won.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.