JE NE SUIS PAS AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL & EDWARD SNOWDEN WHO OPPOSE CIVILIAN RESISTANCE TO NATO (03.06.2015)
The kindergarten 'conversations' of Amnesty International and the whole Edward Snowden Hoax insult everyone’s intelligence by dishonestly trying to portray that civilians do not know that NATO governments are committing Genocide which is the worst crime known to humanity.
The problem is not that civilian society does not know what is going on, but rather that all the gatekeepers illegally deny access to courts of law.
nato's black propaganda of amnesty international and snowden hoax
Palestinian civilians have been waiting since 1948 to get near a court of law, while gatekeepers have been chewing over their lives, outside any legal framework whatsoever.
It is a matter of fact Brian Haw stated quite clearly on the British High Court record that all the Judiciary are running from Genocide.
02.06.2015 HIGH COURT TRANSCRIPT (18.11.2008) & BRIAN HAW'S (14.07.2008) WITNESS STATEMENT
Civilians know exactly what is going on.
Brian also pointed out in the High Court in 2008, that the murder of Jean Charles de Menezes was a police 'hit', which only begs the question what the gatekeepers at Birnberg Pierce/or indeed Mansfield's Tooks have supposedly been doing sitting on their backsides since 2008.
03.06.2015 GUARDIAN ANNOUNCE BIRNBERG JEAN CHARLES DE MENENZES ECHR APPEAL FROM 2008 TO BE HEARD
august 22nd 2005
Birnberg Pierce are foul gatekeepers who threw both Brian and I under the bus in 2011 to try and cover up Genocide.
It does not take 7 years for a high profile appeal supposedly lodged in 2008 at the ECHR to be heard, in what does nevertheless prove that civil payouts do not preclude criminal prosecutions.
02.06.2015: RT: NSA SPIES ON CAMERON, COULD HAVE BACKDOOR INTO GCHQ.
(SH)Amnesty are NATO propagandists
The latest Amnesty/Snowden spiel is a classic gatekeeper conversation that pretends the various arms and legs of what is criminal NATO propaganda are not all working together against civilians, which our own civilian resistance has more than adequately proved is not the case.
it's not about not 'knowing' or 'debates', it's about civilian access to courts of law
The Amnesty/Snowden hyperbole is dishonestly trying to disguise that civilians do know exactly what is going on and want access to courts of law.
none of the pigs in the public trough needed to be 'blackmailed' about anything
A jury in a court of law with facts and evidence is after all quite different from the circus of criminal NATO 'government' and 'news' media propaganda.
There is nothing more unconscionable than chewing over other people's lives in 'debates' that have no regard for the legal framework of civilian society's rule of law.
As our civilian resistance has proved a small group of civilians with no legal training whatsoever, let alone 'help' from any 'news' media or 'lawyers' learned how to force (for example) the repeal of state power and much else for the benefit of everyone.
The entire ‘community’ of designer ‘label’..’gatekeepers’ (i.e.: politicians, journalists, academics, fake NGO's) are all a complete waste of time because all they ever want civilians to do is chew over (‘debate’) other people’s...lives.
The purpose of all gatekeepers is to hijack civilian voices and civilian society's rule of law.
The quite revolting Glenn Greenwald is only a living example of how the gatekeeper 'debate' brigades make millions out of chewing over other civilians lives with entirely hypothetical hyperbole.
The NATO maxim is civilians can ‘choose’ any ‘opinion’ they like in a 'debate' from a whole smorgasbord of NATO propaganda so long as civilians do not do anything beyond tick a box every five years and then shut up.
Obviously our own civilian resistance has not followed that maxim.
What NATO does not want civilians to do in practice is civilian society’s rule of law before (in the case of the UK) any High Court jury in a court of law, which is why one way or another they ridiculously claim civilian society does not 'know' what is going on.
In fact, most civilians are not actually ‘influenced’ by what they read in MSM or alternative ‘news’ media but rather by what degree they can act according to what everyone as human beings knows is right and wrong.
The pseudo babble of 'police' and 'legal experts'...around legislative nonsense again ignores that even the infamous s 3(1) of the Criminal Law 'Act' 1967 admits that the use of reasonable force in self defence is entirely legal.
what it is not is a 'police' power of 'seizure' (which are separately prescribed)
In fact it was the fact that I was using 'reasonable force in self-defence' to retrieve property that errr... 78 'police' officers were stealing, that led to my own unlawful arrest on May 23rd 2006, when the police could not find anything to charge me with while the entire apparatus then illegally denied me access to a High Court jury.
The US 'Gun Lobby' propaganda above is deliberately overlooking the fact that civilians want access to justice before a High Court jury, rather than being tools for NATO propaganda.
Anywhere in the world can be a 'nice place to live' if you keep silent over what the NATO state does because you have no conscience.
In my many years in Parliament Square meeting civilians from around the world it was never the case that civilians did not know the difference between right or wrong and what was going on.
Of course most people understand that the Guardian et al don’t go plastering a selection of rather effeminate white boys across their front pages, with the intention of any changing NATO's illegal system of taxation and legislation.
All the anti-Iran propaganda of the entire NATO 'news' media, of which the Guardian are up there with the rest, neatly sidesteps the fact the Iranian revolution threw NATO out, because then it is so very obvious what NATO is illegally trying to do, including the fact that all the terrorists are their own.
Amnesty International and Edward Snowden are controlled opposition who like their NATO ‘governments’ and ‘news’ media chew over other people’s lives with contrived ‘debates’ rather than achieving like our civilian resistance has (for example) the actual repeal of state power for the benefit of everyone.
In the US, a name change from the Patriot Act to the Freedom Act does not actually repeal the fact the US government are continuing to illegally spy on civilian resistance to NATO.
The US are simply changing from whatever 'bulk collection' supposedly was to making a whole lot of pro-forma applications, which has exactly the same result of targeting legitimate civilian resistance to NATO.
It is NATO who are doing all the work of publicly promoting their terrorists.
26.12.2014 LORD ROTHSCHILD, MURDOCH & CHENEY ‘GENIE ISRAEL’ OIL GRAB IN SYRIAN GOLAN HEIGHTS.
In the UK the repeal we achieved meant no-one had to ask permission from the state (that would not really be given)
Of course the only one's who would then freeze with the legislation that came after that, (that will also be repealed when we have access to a High Court jury) was our own civilian resistance.
The Edward Snowden Hoax keeps dribbling on in the pathetic hope that the NATO corporate state can maintain the internet for it’s own traditional discourse.
It was the 'lawyer/journalist' Glenn Greenwald (and the Guardian) who actually went to the British High Court to insultingly argue that 'journalists' (for example) had 'special' rights over and above everyone else, as though civilians are fools.
the 'journalists' are special and the rest of us are idiots hyperbole
The rhetoric of 'highly experienced journalists' and 'legal experts' is the the Orwellian double speak of the badge and label brigade' who try and suggest civilians are idiots.
indeed greenwald is not there to upset NATO's gravy train of terror
Of course the Judiciary are just as guilty of hiding behind the badge and label brigade of 'experts' over legislation this non-expert contributed to forcing the repeal of.
TUCKER V DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS [2007] EWHC 3019 (ADMIN) (30 NOVEMBER 2007)
(while I was illegally being denied access to a High Court jury) I did not concede as the other 'very experienced counsel' of gatekeepers like 'Liberty' had
(That hearing was null and void because by their own admission they failed to notify me of the hearing, although the very same 'judges' had my details for a different hearing, earlier in the week !)
{pdf=http://brianhaw.tv/images/pdf/summonses.pdf|660|850}
a snapshot of doing the time to prove that civilians are not committing any crime by upholding civilian society's rule of law to try and hold the corporate state legally accountable for Genocide
It is civilian society's rule of law that exposes that the corporate state should be repealed all the way back to it's administrative core.
Of course Amnesty International are a well known and long discredited fake NGO mouthpiece of the colonial state who are anti-Syrian government propagandists.
It is obvious to most civilians that Snowden is working for NATO ‘governments’ and ‘news’ media to try and distract civilian populations from the single fact that NATO regimes are not tracking but rather promoting ‘terrorists’, because they are the terrorists.
Snowden if indeed he ever was any analyst of any kind knows this, as indeed does the entire spook community.
Obviously the world does not exist within the defined parameters that NATO ‘governments’ and both MSM and their alternative ‘news’ media portray.
The internet is another opportunity to roll back the irresponsible and often criminal discourse of NATO 'debating' other people's lives, outside any legal framework.
The only true discourse exists within a framework of civilian society's rule of law where all civilian lives matter everywhere.
Neither Amnesty International nor Edward Snowden who oppose civilian resistance to NATO speak for me.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.
