FAO BRITISH CABINET OFFICE & FOREIGN OFFICE: BRITISH GOVERNMENT TRAINING OF SYRIAN TERRORISTS. (26.03.2015)
It is by no co-incidence that the British Parliament of all dirty political shades are sloping off to have their 'elections' as they very quietly announce the British military hope to overtly train Syrian terrorists in Turkey.
It is another step in the undeclared NATO War on Syria, where the US government sloped off on a break before President Obama launched illegal air strikes in Syria.
another 'moderate' foreign backed syrian 'opposition' commander abu sakr
The premise is that if the British government have no legal challenge over 'training' foreign backed terrorists in Syria, they are closer to a NATO military invasion of Syria.
Subject: BRITISH GOVERNMENT TRAINING OF SYRIAN TERRORISTS
Date: 26 March 2015 17:08:04 CET
Kindly provide in writing (by email is fine) the legal grounds for the British government training what they call ‘moderate’ Syrian Opposition forces, which has not been approved by the British Parliament, so that a legal challenge can be submitted to a court of law, before this training of foreign backed terrorists in Syria begins.
Parliament Square Peace Campaign
not 'moderated: not a single red arrow that agrees with the british government
The British government and news media are deliberately treading very quietly.
It is self-evident that those who are armed by foreign governments who are in opposition to and not acting under the authority of the Syrian government are terrorists.
It is a matter of well documented fact that the British government could never came up with legal grounds to invade Syria.
Obama never did 'find' his imaginary friends in the 'Khorasan' Group.
N.B: The British government have some weird obsession with March 26th.
"...2. The jurisdictional issue to be determined
On 29 March 2007 the appellants, Mr Brian Haw and Ms Barbara Tucker, were convicted of contempt of court contrary to s. 12 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 at the City of Westminster Magistrates' Court by District Judge Daphne Wickham. Mr Haw was fined £250 and Mrs Tucker £50. Both were ordered to pay costs of £50. The case against them was that on 26 March 2007 they had wilfully interrupted proceedings in the face of the court..."
The phoney 'case' above which changed 23 years of case law !! relates to Steve Jago by sheer 'luck' receiving 'summons' against him on March 24th, that were sent on March 23rd 2006, to attend Westminster Magistrates on March 26th 2007.
When we arrived at court on March 26th 2006 (because I was his McKenzie friend because he was illegally being denied legal aid) we also discovered that there were six summons listed against me that had not been delivered, but would have led to an arrest warrant being issued against me (and probably Steve if the summons sent on March 23rd 2006 had not arrived on March 24th) before Brian and I are 'arrested' anyway.
District Judge Nicholas Evans had actually just left the court, after I had just said I would not enter a 'plea', because what was going on was wrong and I wanted to make a complaint. We were just waiting around to find out the new court date, when Brian and I were suddenly 'arrested'.
This happened after Brian and I had sought a summons against Tony Blair & the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police on March 23rd 2007 at Westminster Magistrates. District Judge Purdy had asked to speak to us and when we explained what we were doing, had no choice but to say court staff were obviously obliged to assist (before obviously getting on his bat phone to work out what they could try and do)
The phoney 'summons' against me that were obviously going to be used to get an arrest warrant were place "sine-die", ie: disappeared into the ether never to be mentioned again etc etc etc
The only discernible purpose of the shenanigans was actually to try and get a phoney arrest warrant against me that would have been illegal and not much use beyond intimidation.
The British government were desperately trying to find any way to prevent our getting a High Court jury to repeal fraudulent legislation they were using against us etc, when despite 'arresting' me during a massive six and a half hour 'police raid' on May 23rd 2006 using their fraudulent legislation, they had not been able to charge me with anything.
We have previously explained at length how repealing legislation and submitting legal challenges over their illegal wars, all helps contain the 'power' the state continually illegally gift themselves.
The British State violently oppress (and sometimes murder) civilians at home and murder civilians abroad for no other reason than that is what generates the greatest revenue for big business.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.