NATO HITMEN 'ANTI-TERROR' PHOTO-SHOOT FOLLOWED BY 10,000 TROOPS TO 'LIBERATE' FRANCE (12.01.2015)
Imagine a world where the NATO hitmen like the David Cameron and Rupert Murdoch’s of this world were not imposing what -they- wanted on other people !
NATO have really dropped themselves in it this time with French, German and Spanish 'governments' posturing over European 'border controls' while Britain witters on about new powers to 'monitor' people, when the French government chose not to monitor terrorists with existing powers, which along with the fact terrorists pass through Turkey which is not a part of Europe on their way to Syria, exposes it is not terrorists, these NATO governments are trying to target.
surrender: very dishonest of 'news' media publicists to try to portray these NATO cowards, as marching with any...civilian population
There is an unavoidably noticeable pattern emerging of large scale global attempts to restore the discredited mouthpieces of NATO ‘War on Terror’ propaganda for the obvious reason that without paid for publicists, the long Genocidal NATO ‘War on Terror’ propaganda has no conduit.
The photo-shoot above obviously tried to portray that world 'leaders' were bravely marching with the people, which is simply untrue. I think most people would be surprised if any of these 'world leaders' actually 'marched' more than twenty metres.
Video footage makes it appear that neither Netanyahu or Abbas were supposed to appear on the 'front line' with Hollande and Merkel who snub Cameron. Photos from yesterday show no-one likes Cameron who aptly ended up further away from 'centre' to what was their far 'right' all the time.
It was Cameron who infamously got the British 'news' media to promote him by incredibly claiming in an unprecedented statement (where no response was sought from us) that he would abuse his position as Prime Minister to try to 'remove' our Parliament Square Peace Campaign if he was 'elected', which was a seriously illegal thing for any public official, let alone a wannabee Prime Minister, to say.
His statement instantly rendered null and void all the far from legal 'proceedings' the violent Tories then took against us.
Far from acting in 'defiance' of any terrorists, the NATO hitmen are the first ones to surrender to 'terrorism', or rather what is their real fear, which is unarmed civilians, telling them to get lost.
a goose-step back in time shows many to be participants in the recent NATO Summit in Wales in September 2014
The most recent global example of trying to restore credibility to propagandists was the widely disseminated Edward Snowden Hoax.
The propaganda put about for the uninformed, is that some Westminster Village ‘news’ propagandists like the 'Guardian’ sometimes tell the truth, which for starters, the practical experience of civilian resistance such as even our own Parliament Square Peace Campaign knows to be wholly untrue.
The idea that the Guardian is 'progressive' is of course absolute nonsense that is no more than cheap and nonsensical marketing to try to attract an audience who might consider themselves to be a particular section of society.
The basic rule of thumb with NATO propaganda is people can say pretty much whatever they like so long as it will not threaten the bank balances of propagandists in both 'government' and 'news' media.
Even what came out about undercover policing in Britain was heavily manipulated and limited by the Westminster Village ’news’ media who led by the Guardian, were actually directly involved in supporting the infiltration etc of civilian resistance.
It has taken all of five seconds for NATO hitmen to expose that they are really targeting civilian populations, not terrorists.
'liberation': martial/military 'law'
What all the governments are pointedly ignoring is that the French government already had the necessary 'tools' to 'monitor' the terrorists, who the French 'authorities' claim they did not consider any kind of threat.
" His proposed legislation, which would be introduced within the first year of Cameron’s second term in Downing Street if the Conservatives win the election, would provide a new legal framework for Britain’s GCHQ and other intelligence agencies to crack the communications of terror suspects...
The Spanish, with French and German support, are also pushing for curbs on passport-free travel within the Schengen area that covers most of the EU...Bernard Cazeneuve, the French interior minister, insisted that the rules governing the Schengen passport-free zone had to be changed.
Dimitris Avramopoulos, the EU commissioner for home affairs, resisted the demands from Spain and France for changes to the Schengen travel regime, pointing out that there is already scope for temporary introduction of document checks and the re-erection of national border controls if a government invokes emergency conditions.
Before changing the rules, said Natasha Bertaud, a commission spokeswoman, “first we want to make maximum use of the existing rules.”
Officials point out that revised rules would have made no difference in Paris as the three killed assailants were French nationals resident in the capital..."
It is Turkey who are not a member of the EU, who are 'facilitating' the travel of European terrorists to Syria through Turkey, which has nothing to do with people traveling throughout Europe.
So far from targeting terrorists, European 'governments' are exposed once again, simply using something like the Paris 'Terror' Attack to once again try to target civilians they personally do not like.
Damascus, SANA – A source at Foreign and Expatriates Ministry said that the confirmation by Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu that terrorist Hayat Boumeddiene entered Turkey on Jan. 2 and crossed into Syria on Jan. 8 constitutes a clear official confession that Turkey is still a main route for foreign terrorists to infiltrate into Syria and return to their countries in blatant violation of UNSC resolutions 2170 and 2178 on counterterrorism.
Boumeddiene is the wife of terrorist Amedi Coulibaly who was killed during the release of hostages he had been holding in a supermarket in Paris. She is wanted by the French authorities who described her as “armed and dangerous.”
The source said that the ease with which terrorists move through the Turkish territories reaffirms the involvement of the Turkish government with the armed terrorist groups and makes Turkey a direct partner in shedding the blood of innocents in Syria and all over the world.
The Foreign Ministry said that Syria calls upon the international community to take effective actions and put an end to the destructive Turkish policy which is directly responsible for the growth of takfiri terrorist activity in the region.
The source also called for putting into effect all mechanisms provided by the UNSC resolutions to stop supporting terrorism and deal with the phenomenon of foreign fighters."
It is incredible that Turkey actually admit making sure that a terrorist crossed into Syria, while the NATO 'news' media does not question the assistance given by the Turkish government to terrorists.
The narrative is that the European public will not complain about terrorists going to Syria, only about some returning, and only then when the job of overthrowing the Syrian government is not done, like it was in Libya.
In legal terms it is impossible to distinguish between the terrorists in the Paris Attack, and those NATO misleadingly call moderate Syrian 'Opposition' who are illegally trying to overthrow the Syrian 'government' because they all use what are lethal weapons that kill innocent civilians.
In fact at Christmas the 'news' media made a big noise about welcoming back two mercenaries returning from Syria, who were not arrested etc at all.
It is not by happenstance that NATO propagandists do not go near continuing attempts to co-opt, infiltrate and try to destroy any civilian resistance to...illegal wars, which neither the Edward Snowden Hoax or undercover policing touch upon in Britain, because that involves our own continuing civilian resistance.
bandwagon: rupert murdoch leads the media barons attempts to try to jump on the bandwagon of continuing to try to hijack the civilian voice of people who 'politicians' have never dared march alongside
the xmas 'news' media mercenaries
The 'government' and 'news' media always work hand in hand to peddle propaganda that has to be very carefully managed across the wide spectrum of public 'opinions' they are trying to solicit for their own use on any given day, to avoid the rule of law.
the european mercenaries have not overthrown the syrian government so we have martial law on the streets of europe
We have evidence ourselves of the BBC publishing a heavily edited recording of one of my own unlawful arrests on May 25th 2010.
The BBC purposefully (& illegally) edited out the illegal use of an agent provocateur from controlled opposition known as ‘Democracy Village’ in a recording from an as yet still unknown ‘source’, in what became far from legal proceedings where I was unsurprisingly illegally imprisoned without legal representation or trial in 2011, shortly after Brian Haw died. !
An average member of the public would not know but also not be surprised now, that 'government' and 'news' media go to such lengths to collaborate in such criminality.
the bbc widely circulated a heavily edited recording where they colluded with government agents like 'phoenix' who wtinessed the illegal use of an agent provocateur from his democracy village, to make a complaint -after- i was unlawfully arrested
the black woman at the back on the right who is with 'phoenix' and 'democracy village' comes forward after i am arrested and i am asking on what legal grounds i have been arrested, to mockingly claim while laughing, as a further provocation that it is because i kid you not, i have 'offended her dog'...
The reason I was really 'arrested' is because Brian passed me his video recorder which would have made it impossible for the BBC et al to publish what the whole BBC-led story for that State Opening became.
Obviously it is seriously illegal for the BBC to publish an edited recording of what they claim happened, which is far worse than they portray, before they tried and failed to repeat it all the following year when they actually had the nerve to ask if they could 'embed' with our campaign !
In 2011 when the BBC were desperately trying to run a hit piece it only back-fired on them when we unsurprisingly would have nothing to do with them.
They made themselves look very stupid putting out a piece pointing a dirty great camera in my face, asking me why I was irony of ironies holding a camera...filming the BBC because neither the BBC or 'Democracy Village' would leave me alone !
And on it went as they tried to pursue me in a similar vein.
The fact civilians uphold society's rule of law, does not make them the 'public property' of anyone else, to do whatever they want.
The point is 'government' and 'news' media propagandists always work hand in hand to try and destroy civilian resistance.
It is well established that obviously the last thing the British Establishment wants is a jury in the High Court examining a claim against the British government, that really reveals what the British ‘government’ and ‘news’ media et al really do...together.
Of course, the true recording involving the illegal use of an agent provocateur and much else, after I had been unlawfully arrested and the police needed someone to come forward with an actual ‘complaint’ would also have destroyed any ability of the British ‘government’ and ‘news’ media to try to use their fake ‘Democracy Village’ against us.
bandwagon: the former russian spy turned media baron glossed over the fact world leaders did not link arms in solidarity with people...anywhere
soldiers on the streets is not 'liberation'
The British ‘government’ and ‘news’ media used ‘Democracy Village’ for a further two years to try and destroy our own Parliament Square Peace Campaign so it was a hugely significant cover up that -all- the Westminster Village ‘news’ media were in on the whole disgraceful episode.
Make no mistake that the purpose of ‘Democracy Village’ was anything other than a further very serious attempt to actually murder us, during which Brian Haw sadly died, after having endured the most number of years of what remains quite extraordinary violent oppression by the state.
The War on Syria obviously involves this appalling and relentless kind of state violence on a very much larger scale, where only the principle of destroying legitimate resistance is the same.
The point cannot be made too strongly that those who give succour to NATO propagandists with the lie that sometimes the likes of the ‘progressive’ Guardian et al are trying to tell people the truth, only continue to irresponsibly put a very many civilian lives, everywhere at risk.
It is as predictable as day becomes night that the BBC introduce the anti-semitic argument into the Hebdo mix to try to suggest that they can be ‘controversial’ too.
12.01.2015 DAILY MAIL REPEAT BBC PRETENDING THEY ARE 'CONTROVERSIAL' WITH USUAL 'ANTI-SEMITIC' BACK & FORTH IN HEBDO MIX.
All that is actually ‘controversial’ about the whole anti-semitic hoax is that the Palestinian Justice Minister Saleem al-Saqqa has quite properly demanded that Palestinian people have that most basic right of access to justice at the ICC to try and save their own lives.
It is desperate for Israel to try and claim that the US have some sort of civil legal jurisdiction over Palestinian people, while trying to claim the ICC cannot have jurisdiction over the most serious crimes committed against Palestinian people.
The exceptional difficulty Palestinian people face is that they have no choice in challenging what is the whole illegal nature of colonialism, which goes beyond the Israeli government.
Of course there is no anti-semitic argument in the legal fact Zionism which has nothing to do with Judaism, is the re-branding of colonialism, so that the 'State of Israel' could become the most heavily armed military garrison for the EU and then US, in Middle East Oil Wars.
the rupert murdoch royal 'we': no civilian was standing for rupert murdoch
I remember a senior police officer coming along in early 2006 to say he was getting out of policing himself because it had become so politicized he was being ordered to just train police to exercise nothing more than mob rule over anyone and everyone.
Those involved in ‘Democracy Village’ were all agents of the state or those who on occasion admitted they were homeless and had been co-opted for drugs, alcohol and/or money.
For those of us who experienced the grotesque nature of what was ‘Democracy Village’ what repeatedly stood out as being the primary movers and shakers behind it, was always rule Britannia or strangely so we thought, Mossad.
'Democracy Village' was our own seriously steep learning curve of the 'dark arts' practiced by the state et al and just how far that all goes.
There has always been a peculiarly Zionist driven hate fest against our own civilian resistance.
'joined': the money markets have a very loose interpretation of 'joined'
It was very early on in 'Democracy Village' that on one occasion when some guy had been trying to get into my tent, Brian talked to him to distract him, while I emptied the contents of his backpack onto the ground only to be surprised to find not only a private security badge, but ID from the IDF.
He was very angry and said he would be back and we did not doubt him.
Incredibly it became apparent and it was confirmed by a ‘Heritage’ Warden who worked for the Mayor of London who resigned, that as the authorities became more desperate ‘Democracy Village’ was even used as a half-way house for very violent criminals the British government could not re-house, but could slyly claim they were ‘monitoring’ through CCTV.
Another male from ‘Democracy Village’ who held me against a fence while threatening to get a gun to blow my brains out, claimed he had been released after armed robberies that he claimed involved him chopping off the fingers of victims (he showed myself and two other female witnesses his PNC ‘police print out’ which did have armed robberies but could have been faked)
I was told but I do not know if it is true, that this male went on to stab a woman who ran a newspaper stall by Westminster Station, before going back to prison.
On another occasion an obviously disturbed man from ‘Democracy Village’ who had a very long history of repeatedly harassing me, had to be taken away by police when he started throwing bottles at us, with the police claiming he has just been released from prison, with obviously one idea on his mind as he returned to Parliament Square.
In fact, on the tenth anniversary of our Parliament Square Peace Campaign, shortly before I was due to fly out to Brian who sadly died shortly after, another member of ‘Democracy Village’ had to be hauled away by police, after drunkenly coming up and first trying and failing to smash an empty wine bottle over my head, before nevertheless getting through two grown men to punch me in the jaw.
And so on it went on and on.
In practice, there is no 'freedom' to speak out against NATO 'government' and 'news media.
While the British government were overtly violently trying to smash our own civilian resistance in Parliament Square, what stands out is that both the ‘mainstream’ and so called ‘alternative’ news media were joined at the hip warbling on about anything but society’s rule of law, which really does just waste everyone’s...lives.
What I also remember most is that people we spoke to or who saw the fake ‘Democracy Village’ completely understood what was going on, which was in complete contrast to the ‘news’ media.
It is no secret that our Parliament Square Peace Campaign civilian resistance has no time or respect for people who hide behind the label of ‘journalism’ to irresponsibly and dishonestly claim they can say whatever they like about other people’s...lives.
The misleading propaganda that some people can say whatever they like to cause identifiable harm to someone else, just by waving around many banners including the one called ‘journalism’ is simply not tenable.
Only stupidity, or most people can only suspect far worse in the case of the Paris ’Terror’ attacks, gives NATO propaganda the oxygen of publicity it so desperately needs to survive, which only puts even more civilian lives at risk.
There has probably never been quite such an overt attempt by NATO propagandists in ‘government’ and ‘news’ media to try to narrowly define who people will be, so that they can try to control them as there has been with ‘Je suis Charlie’.
Indeed we need to ask ourselves the question as to why this terror attack happened in France now ?
Of course the beauty of France, the French people and the French way of life cannot be reduced to saying everyone is Charlie Hebdo because Charlie Hebdo simply does not go anywhere near reflecting France, it’s people or indeed anywhere.
Amongst many things, ‘Je Suis Charlie’ is an obvious marketing ploy by NATO propagandists who are saying we are telling you what you will think and who you will be.
The inference is that anyone who does not want to be Charlie Hebdo who is a fully paid up member of the NATO propaganda brigade, is ‘suspect’ in one way or another.
Yet Charlie Hebdo was actually a small group of people sitting around in an office with frankly nothing better to do than having a laugh about who they would next publicly poke what they called ‘fun’ at, while curiously slapping themselves on the back over how ‘clever’ that made them.
I cannot personally pretend to understand what makes anyone want to do what Charlie Hebdo did in mercilessly mocking people, nor how they could possibly think it was a worthy ‘crusade’.
It is certainly is not even clever to post what they claim are pictures of Muhammed for the simple reason, how on this earth could they claim to know what Muhammed looks like ?
Indeed it was Dieudonne who was vilified as public enemy number one of the French ‘government’ and ‘news’ media this time last year for his hugely popular ‘quenelle’ which is very obviously giving the finger to the ‘Establishment’, is lambasted again.
The 'news' media et al only make themselves look eternally stupid fervently sticking to the line that giving the equivalent of a very large finger (ie: the whole arm) to the Establishment is 'anti-semitic'.
france roared with laughter over this photo of manuel valls who is now the prime minister being given the equivalent of a very large finger by a group of young people
People have been very honest that they are giving the finger to the Establishment, whether it is the 'government' or 'news' media who are the Establishment.
This time round the complaint is Dieudonne 'controversially' pointed out ‘Je suis Charlie Coulibaly’ when he is treated like a terrorist because he exercises his freedom of expression.
12.01.2015 QUENELPLUS: LIBERTE D'EXPRESSION: DIEUDONNE REPOND DE BERNARD CASENEUVE.
All those involved in the Charlie Hebdo 'Terror' attack should never have lost their lives, but we must be honest in saying that NATO propagandists in ‘government’ and ‘news’ media have no interest in people knowing the truth of what really happened.
"...we will have business to sort you out,” the caller continued. Naji al-Ali ignored the warning and published a cartoon lampooning Arafat and his henchmen on 24 June.
Ten months after Naji al-Ali was shot, Scotland Yard arrested a Palestinian student who turned out to be a Mossad agent. Under interrogation, the Jerusalem-born man, Ismail Suwan, said that his superiors in Tel Aviv had been briefed well in advance of the plot to kill the cartoonist..."
I cannot pretend to understand the ‘Official Version’ of why the Paris terrorists who it is claimed wanted to go out in a ‘blaze of glory’ would then retreat to a warehouse on an industrial state where their fate is certainly sealed by the ‘government’ and ‘news’ media they apparently claimed to oppose.
What is clear to most people is that the terrorists were neither professionally trained nor organized as they blindly followed orders that only suit a narrow ‘news’ media narrative of NATO propagandists.
Why proven liars like Laurent Fabius who ordered the false flag terror attack bombing on the Rainbow Warrior to try to silence people across the Pacific gets another ‘chance’ to have a public platform to claim the French ‘government’ he is still a part of now tell the truth about anything entirely escapes me.
zut alors: where are the money men going with all this ?
Charlie Hebdo is not dissimilar to the peculiar ‘Private Eye’ and ‘Have I got News’ colonialist ‘humour’ prevalent in Britain where public school boys try to portray deeply vicious psychopaths like the Mayor of London Boris Johnson as buffoons we should all laugh with or at.
The accompanying psychobabble in Britain is that ‘politicians are not so bad and don’t mean’ to trample all over human life in their vulgar and greedy clamour for money, when the opposite is actually the reality.
Sadly the idea that civilians just want NATO propagandists whether they be hiding behind any banner including ‘politics’ or ‘news’ media, to just leave everyone alone and let people live in peace, is not an option they are putting on the table.
It nevertheless remains a matter of fact that most people know ‘terror’ attacks are only ever used by propagandists to claim they have some new ‘right’ to gift themselves control over other people’s lives.
If people really want to save lives, it is very important that people find the time to very seriously reflect on what the Paris ‘Terror’ Attack really means and why it happened now, rather than just reading and accepting what is in any event the superficiality of what ‘government’ and ‘news’ media say and do.
It can only remain that decent and civilized society wants the rule of law, which rather than ‘politics’ and ’news’ media is what is really supposed to govern everyone.
NATO who have no legal grounds for being in the Middle East, has long proven beyond all reasonable doubt, that it has no respect for any rule of law.
People will therefore reasonably conclude that the Paris ‘Terror’ Attacks were false flags run by discredited NATO ‘governments’ and ‘news’ media who have revealed that they want their continuing agenda for the coming year to be yet more of their NATO ‘War on Terror’ propaganda.
...martial law/military rule if they can get away with it...
I remember while returning to Britain one time, the French border patrol was looking at my passport before consulting his computer before he actually laughed when he obviously found my name which has long been on the 'flagged' list thanks to the likes of the wholly unscrupulous British Home Secretary, Cruella De Ville aka Theresa May.
Well it is vicious for 'politicians' to put peace campaigners who are unarmed civilian resistance, on watch-lists etc, because they can only discredit themselves.
I remember a lawyer called Sultana Tafadar explaining when I complained that a 'Judge' wouldn't let me speak in court, that the 'problem' was I told too much of the truth !
Quite how civilians can tell too much of the truth, to try and save people's...lives remains a mystery in any real sense.
We continue to oppose the NATO ‘War on Terror’ propaganda because it so obviously only violently oppresses civilians at home and murders civilians abroad because that is the blunt instrument of an illegal ‘system’ that is only designed to unimaginatively generate the greatest revenue for big business who care nothing about anyone’s life.
it is the french government who claimed the terrorists, who they chose to not 'monitor', with existing 'powers', were not a threat
It remains that while the French government now support air strikes etc in Iraq, French civilian opposition to the Iraq War is one thing that people everywhere really can be united in respect for French people over.
Only the likes of Rupert Murdoch will be laughing all the way to the Syrian Golan Heights while murdering Syrian civilians, to steal more oil, if he gets his way.