TICKET SALES: MI5 & MOAZZAM BEGG PROMOTE MERCENARY TERRORIST RECRUITMENT FOR NATO’S BOGUS ‘WAR ON TERROR’. (16.11.2014)
We are all encouraged by the British ‘government’ and ‘news’ media to buy our ‘ticket’ in the bogus ‘War On Terror’ which oppresses people at home while slaughtering people abroad, in what are still colonial wars.
In legal terms, MI5 asset Moazzam Begg’s advertising vehicle at Cage featuring Yvonne Ridley, which is supported by the usual suspects at Amnesty International, Reprieve, Freedom from Torture, Justice, REDRESS, The Aire Centre, Rights Watch UK and Liberty could not be construed in any other way than a mercenary recruitment centre supported by the British ‘government’
...the Bogus 'War on Terror' that oppresses people at home and slaughters people abroad...
The common link between all these British ‘Jihadis’ are that they are all anti-Syrian government propagandists.
The rather large contradiction in terms with the ‘ticket sales’ to terror is that they demand the law abiding majority of people throw all logic which is the rule of law, out the window, and first and foremost ignore the Genocide of the...British government that has been perpetrated and continues since the colonial wars.
The sole purpose of all the groups named above is to: a) recruit people to either commit Genocide for the British government or b) cover up the Genocide of the British government.
There is no greater cowardice than all those who resort to picking up a lethal weapon to continue the Genocide of the British government.
We do all have a very serious legal duty to counsel people to not pick up a lethal weapon to collaborate with and do the dirty work of the long Genocidal British government, that has nothing whatsoever to do with the lawful use of reasonable force in self-defense.
Cage provide an admirable case study that constitutes evidence of how MI5 recruit their mercenary British 'Jihadis'.
1. MOAZZAM BEGG HAS TWELVE UTTERLY POINTLESS QUESTIONS.
The MI5 and Moazzam Begg recruitment machine invite people to believe that there are twelve questions not being answered over the alleged arrest of the anti-Syria propagandist Moazzam Begg.
The fact Moazzam Begg and his lawyers admit that they work with MI5 is enough to make a reasonable person not believe a single word they say.
Nobody who challenges the Genocidal criminality of the British government is going to touch the MI5 Moazzam Begg crew with a barge pole.
2. SUPREME COURT CAGE PRISONERS BEGHAL S7 TERROR LEGISLATION SCAM
The case of Sylvie Beghal, from the Beghal family of Al-CIA- Qaeda intelligence assets, which was originally used for failed propaganda, has very clearly been manipulated, in a collaborative effort between Mrs Beghal and the British government, to wheel it out again, to continue to try to cover up a real legal challenge etc:
BEGHAL v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS  EWHC 2573(Admin)(28 August 2013)
a) there is no explanation of why or how anyone can appeal a case where they plead...guilty, because the fact a person is arguing the case is an abuse of process, is not a reason to plead guilty.
"...para 3: On the 12th December, 2011, at Leicester Magistrates' Court, before District Judge Temperley, the Appellant pleaded guilty [the defendant plead ummm...guilty for the purposes of propaganda] to one charge of wilfully failing to comply with a duty imposed under or by virtue of Schedule 7, contrary to para. 18(1)(a) of that Schedule.
That plea followed (1) a ruling by the District Judge that he had no power to stay the proceedings as an abuse of process of the Court on the grounds advanced by the Appellant and that only a higher Court could do so; (2) an indication from the District Judge that, in those circumstances, it was highly likely he would find the Appellant guilty of the charge in question.
The Case stated two Questions ("the Questions") for the consideration of this Court:
" 1. Did I err in law in refusing to stay the proceedings against the Appellant on the basis that her prosecution for failure to comply with a duty under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act amounted to a breach of her rights under Articles 5, 6 and 8 of the ECHR (including her rights of access to a lawyer, the privilege against self-incrimination and right to privacy and family life)?
2. Did I err in law in refusing to stay the proceedings against the Appellant on the basis that her prosecution for failure to comply with a duty under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 amounted to an unjustifiable interference with her rights to free movement within the territory of the European Union as an EU national? "
It may at once be noted that Mr. Ryder QC, for the Appellant, rightly in our view, disclaimed in terms any criticism of the District Judge's ruling that the relief sought by the Appellant could only be granted by the High Court.
Accordingly, the Questions will be re-formulated (see below)[the Judges then changed the case that was stated which was utter rubbish and does not address the guilty plea], reflecting the focus of the appeal on the substance of the Appellant's complaints rather than the District Judge's conclusions or assumptions as to the limits of his jurisdiction."
b) in fact the defendant agreed in the High Court to not argue the Declaration of Incompatibility, which means there could not be a legal challenge in the Supreme Court over what the Appellant agreed to not argue in the High Court.
At the outset of the hearing and subsequently we raised with the parties the question of the remedies sought by Mr. Ryder on behalf of the Appellant. We wished to clarify whether the Appellant advanced a general challenge to the compatibility of the Schedule 7 powers with the various ECHR provisions already highlighted or merely a complaint as to their exercise in this individual case. Insofar as the Appellant's case involved or might lead the Court to consider granting a Declaration of Incompatibility pursuant to s.4 of the Human Rights Act 1998 ("the HRA 1998"), we were mindful of the requirements to give notice to the Crown in accordance with CPR Part 19.4A and CPR 19APD.6.
In the circumstances, we were grateful for the attendance at the hearing of Mr. Paul Nicholls QC, on behalf of the Secretary of State for the Home Department ("the SSHD"). Notice to the Crown had only, however, been given late in the day, so that Mr. Nicholls was (understandably) not in a position to take an active part in the hearing. An adjournment would have been obviously inconvenient [why] but, with the constructive assistance of all counsel, a practical solution was devised. We would proceed with the hearing on the understanding that if, in the course of preparing our judgment, we found ourselves provisionally inclining to a Declaration of Incompatibility (of course, a remedy of last resort), then we would re-list the matter for further argument so that Mr. Nicholls could be heard."
In legal terms, the court and all the counsel by agreeing to not argue the incompatibility of the legislation with the rule of law, agreed that the legislation was not incompatible.
The Beghal case is a typically stage managed farce, that the Appellant really is on.
(NB: it is a matter of fact that Liberty had ‘conceded’ that legislation was compatible with the rule of law, our campaign nevertheless got repealed no thanks to the whole array of gatekeepers)
c) the legal mechanism by which further ‘evidence’ is then invited from handpicked well known collaborators with the British government, at the Supreme Court is utterly 'inexplicable'.
"...Ms Beghal is now appealing to the Supreme Court. Her case is being supported by several organisations including the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) and CAGE, who, with the support and coordination of the law firm Leigh Day, will all present evidence of the discriminatory and disproportionate impact of Schedule 7 on Muslims and minority ethnic communities..."
In a sense the whole 'proceedings' are an abuse of the process really with a bizarre closed door 'public consultation' over legislation in the Supreme Court, rather than a real legal challenge at any time of any kind from all the players involved.
The facts of our own campaign's experience over legislation that our campaign got repealed, is that the British government will put all manner of gatekeepers around to try to disguise the real people who effectively challenge legislation, and how you really do it.
07.11.2014 NUREMBERG BRITISH 'JUSTICE' SYSTEM WITH 'CLASS ACTION' REPEAL OF 3000+ LEGISLATIVE FRAUDS IN BOGUS 'WAR ON TERROR'
Of course any reasonable person knows that the purpose of the S7 'Terror' legislation is to trial/progress illegal detention without legal representation
In legal terms it is clear that the legislation does not outline any legal grounds for the absence of legal representation for what is an arrest.
There is no ticking time bomb behind this legislation that was designed solely with propaganda in mind.
3. GATE-KEEPING EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION & TORTURE.
A public inquiry is a pointless waste of everyone’s time that does not go anywhere near bringing real evidence in legal proceedings with a jury against those in government involved.
It is very well known that all the groups who dishonestly claim to speak for others are collaborators with the British government.
Yvonne Ridley really does take the cake with the ‘humanitarian’ call to arms, that it is good for anyone to die for Genocidal Britain.
"As I remember my grandfather Charles Richard Mills, who was gassed in the trenches by the Germans in the First World War, and my late father Allan Ridley who did his bit as a youth in the Royal Navy in the Second, and lived to tell the tale, I am also going to set aside some time for those Brits who have more recently sacrificed their lives, not for their country but for the plight of the oppressed [no-one reasonably believes the US & EU corporate bankers are 'oppressed' by their obscene 'bonuses']...
If I was younger and thought I could do something positive to help I might also have headed for Syria....
The pictures of those suffering women and children shown on the BBC made me feel angry and helpless as world leaders huffed and puffed about red lines being crossed and then did absolutely nothing to help Assad's victims....The Deghayes family still have one son in the conflict area. Amer, aged 20, travelled to Syria with Jaffar in October 2013; he has already survived being shot in the stomach. He told a Vice [Rupert Murdoch] News documentary filmed earlier this year: "My work here is not done. I came here to give victory to the people [British government] and make sure that they receive justice, and we still haven't reached the goal yet[of illegaly overthrowing the Syrian government for...NATO.]"
I declined the invite for a cup of tea and further chat about why I was in Parliament Square, with two men in suits who said they were from the 'Home Office', early on in my time in Parliament Square.
Not once during the 48 times I was illegally 'arrested' in 7 years did the 'police' ever 'interview' me in a...'patisserie' !!
The 2004 Guardian 'article' makes it clear that Yvonne Ridley who is now a 'patron' of 'Cage', has always been deeply involved in the recruitment of intelligence assets for the British government.
Clearly Yvonne Ridley never 'converted/reverted' from being a foul propagandist and collaborator with the Genocidal British government.
NATO mercenaries beheading Syrian soldiers.
"...(para 9) UNDOF observed armed members of the opposition transferring 89 wounded persons from the Bravo side across the ceasefire line to IDF and IDF on the Alpha side handing over 19 treated and 2 deceased individuals....UNDOF observed IDF on the Alpha side handing over two boxes to armed members of the opposition on the Bravo side....(para 13) In the afternoon of 24 April, two members of the armed opposition displayed the severed head of a presumed Syrian armed forces officer as they passed United Nations position 80..."
In legal terms, the well established facts are, armed Kurds from numerous groups like the Peshmerga have been collaborating in fighting alongside the Genocidal US & EU 'governments', most recently ignoring the fact that the 'Islamic State' is a creation of the US & EU 'governments'.