EDWARD SNOWDEN HOAX: US & EU ‘NEWS’ MEDIA ARE THE ENEMY, IN A TIME OF ENDLESS...WAR & TERROR (28.10.2014)

LAST UPDATED 29.10.2014

 

We do live in a time of universal deceit where telling the truth is an evolutionary act.

Publicly doing the rule of law to protect life, as our campaign has proved, will not only get you arrested but lead to ‘government’ trying to murder you, while the whole spectrum of edit...orial ’news’ media label you a ‘criminal’/suspect or ‘radical’ thinker.

 


 

It is revealing of the times we live in, that living the rule of law is called the ‘crime’ and considered ‘radical’ by ‘government’ and ’news’ media, and all their useful idiots, because that is the elephant in the room they collectively wish to bury.

While the racist colonialist is slaughtering innocent civilians there is an unlimited amount of distractions they are willing to sell you, or let you sell, so long as you shut up, about restoring the rule of law in the US and EU, because that is what will stop them robbing and slaughtering.

Restoring the rule of law which is what society agrees really governs all people in the US & EU means everyone has a responsibility and an active role to play.

Most people who know that the Guardian et al don’t tell the truth and particularly when it comes to war, understand that the whole Edward Snowden roadshow is a cruel and wicked hoax.

 

28.10.2014 RT: GUARDIAN EDWARD SNOWDEN HOAX ROADSHOW CONTINUES.

 

29.10.2014 GUARDIAN, GEORGE SOROS 'PRIVACY INTERNATIONAL' LIBERTY & AMNESTY ET AL, CONTINUE TRYING TO MANAGE THE 'SURVEILLANCE' ROADSHOW.

 

The Edward Snowden hoax is very much a distraction from real truth-tellers like Serena Sim who was murdered in Turkey.

 

19.10.2014 PRESS TV REPORTER SERENA SHIM KILLED IN SUSPICIOUS CAR ‘ACCIDENT’ AFTER TURKISH 'INTELLIGENCE' ACCUSE HER OF SPYING.

 


 

22.10.2014 PRESS TV'S SERENA SHIM'S FATHER SAYS: "MY DAUGHTER WAS A RESISTANCE FIGHTER"

 

"...the independent new media community should also develop an institutional/legal agenda; investigate and collect evidence in support of prosecutable cases..."

 

US and EU 'news' media have never shown any interest in gathering information like facts and evidence, let alone for the purpose of prosecutable cases.

 

27.10.2014 INDEPENDENT: RACIST COLONIALIST, ROBERT FISK IGNORES THAT LETHALLY ARMED US & EU BACKED SYRIAN 'OPPOSITION' ARE ALL...TERRORISTS TRYING TO...ILLEGALLY OVERTHROW THE...SYRIAN GOVERNMENT

 

"...Although the attackers were identified as Jabhat al-Nusra rebels – the Syrian army regards all of its opponents as “terrorists” and part of Isis..."

 

27.10.2014 FARS NEWS AGENCY: IDLIB HAS NOT FALLEN TO THE US-LED COALITION.

 

"...The Reuters news agency on Monday reported that the Al-Nusra Front militants had entered Idlib city and captured a government building in there.

"The news by some western media sources that the terrorist groups had captured Idlib is not true and the Syrian troops have thwarted the attempt by the militants to seize the city," a Syrian military source told FNA on Monday.

The military source noted that Al-Nusra Front-affiliated groups, assisted by Kataeb Jund Al-Aqsa terrorists, tried to capture Idlib by attacking the city from the Northwestern side.

He reiterated that the Syrian army killed three notorious commanders of the Al-Nusra Front in the clashes in Idlib and Idlib countryside.

Idlib has been under the control of the Syrian army for more than a year.

Earlier today, the Syrian Army foiled an infiltration attempt by the al-Nusra Front terrorists into a government building in Idlib, killing and injuring dozens of them.

The army soldiers pushed out the al-Nusra terrorists as they attempted to infiltrate into a building in the Northern areas of Idlib, and managed to claim the lives of scores of them.

Syria has been experiencing unrest since March 2011 with organized attacks by well-armed gangs and terrorists against both the army and civilians.

The unrest, which took in terrorist groups from across Europe, the Middle-East and North Africa, has transpired as one of the bloodiest conflicts in recent history.

As the foreign-backed insurgency in Syria continues without an end in sight, the US government has boosted its political and military support to Takfiri extremists..."

Make no mistake that Greenwald & Co, along with the likes of Robert Fisk, mean just like Rupert Murdoch, to cause anyone who challenges the false reality of the entire spectrum of US & EU ’news’ media invent, the most serious harm.

 


Snowden & Co are sinister psychopaths in sheep's clothing, distracting people from restoring the rule of law in the US & EU, to stop these governments murdering innocents.

 

Greenwald & Co are the enemy in sheep’s clothing and those who make apologias for them condemn more innocent people to die.

The Edward Snowden Hoax and the collaborative efforts of western 'news' media with their beheading videos are just actually signs of an increasingly discredited and desperate colonial ‘news’ media urging people to look at and believe them.

Murdoch bread and circuses only manages to sell his murderous propaganda through the commercialization of ...football.

The racist and colonial ‘news’ media do not deserve any respect, simply because they wave the label ‘journalist’ around.

 

It is Greenwald and the Guardian who revealingly in two separate court cases in the British courts sought to give 'journalism' special rights over and above the rest of us, which the rule of law cannot swing however many weasel words it may try to invent to suggest otherwise.

 

In the first case, Greenwald who as a failed lawyer is no innocent to the system, knows what he is doing is wrong, in actually trying to claim 'journalists' have special rights over and above everyone else.

 

MIRANDA v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT & ORS [2014] EWHC 255 (19 February 2014)


"...Mr Greenwald's account of the practice of "responsible journalism" has a didactic quality:

33. From my experience I can indicate that there are many ingredients to the sensible reporting of very sensitive information. They include, but are not limited to, the following:


(1) If possible, one should seek to use the skills and judgment of highly experienced journalists and legal experts. This is the most appropriate and safest way to decide whether to publish information and how much of it to disclose. That collective experience enables a careful judgment of both the public interest and any risks or dangers that may arise on publication.


(2) Experienced editors and reporters are able to consider what, if anything, may be published without endangering innocent life. They cannot always, of course, do so with complete perfection. But the history of investigative journalism leaves no doubt that such judgments can be, and almost always are, made with great responsibility.


(3) Editors and other journalists not only have experience, but they also have established methods through which to communicate with government officials in relation to publication. These can be both formal and informal. These procedures enable journalists to determine which stories may be sensitive ...

...Mr Greenwald's account (paragraph 33) of the "many ingredients to the sensible reporting of very sensitive information" is insubstantial; or rather, mysterious – the reader is left in the dark as to how it is that "highly experienced journalists and legal experts" (paragraph 33(1)) or "[e]xperienced editors and reporters" (33(2)) are able to know..."

 

In the second Guardian case, involving what is not such a secret trial really, the court illegally ruled that in the particular case, anything but what the defendant had to say could be reported, while remarkably what it turned out was incredibly reported was supposedly evidence of voice intercepts by police, which are not actually admissible as evidence in courts in the UK !

 

The Judges also sought to say select 'journalists' did have special rights in courts.

 

GUARDIAN NEWS & MEDIA LTD & ORS v INCEDAL [2014] EWCA CRIM 1861 (24 SEPTEMBER 2014)

 

"...the following elements of the trial heard in open Court

 

i)    Swearing in of the jury.

ii)    Reading the charges to the jury.

iii)    At least a part of the Judge's introductory remarks to the jury.

iv)    At least a part of the Prosecution opening.

v)    The verdicts.

vi)    If any convictions result, sentencing (subject to any further argument before the trial Judge as to the need for a confidential annexe)...

 

...

 

i)    The selection of the journalists in question is not in the hands of the Secretaries of State. Instead, as provided in our Order, up to ten accredited journalists (as defined in the Order) may attend the trial subject to the terms as to confidentiality there set out. As further provided in our Order, any disagreement about which accredited journalists should be permitted to attend the private [unusual wording that suggests the court has not been closed but rather hired by the 'news' media for the whole event] parts of the trial is to be resolved by the Appellants amongst themselves or, failing such resolution, is to be referred back to this Court.

 

In fact if anyone reads the weasel words carefully they will realize, anyone who asked to attend court (which they should not have to do, let alone at great expense) could not be refused.

 

14.10.2014 TONY BLAIR 'SECRET' TERROR SHOW TRIAL LABELS...PUBLIC ‘TERRORIST’... 'SUSPECTS’.

 

15.10.2014 BRITISH 'SECRET' TRIAL STAGED, TO...CONFLATE PRO 'ISLAMIC STATE' RHETORIC WITH REAL RESISTANCE TO...BRITISH GOVERNMENT.

 

In fact contrary to what the 'news' media portray over the 'secret' trial, it does appear, since what the defendant 'says' has been albeit selectively reported, by repeating police 'voice intercepts' which are actually inadmissible as evidence in the UK, that the use of the word 'private' may suggest that criminal courts are being hired for show trials that are 'news' media propaganda, which is not that surprising in this day and age of deceit.

 

Those who know about our own campaign will know that Westminster City Council were found out, essentially hiring criminal courts with private prosecutors to illegally try us with their quite unique failed prosecutions we just ignored, over the supposedly 'criminal' offence of having an umbrella.

 

The whole premise of the secret trial propaganda is that the public are being told yet again that we must accept what the 'news' media tell us.

 

It is self evident that so called alternative 'news' media who do not make it their business to even be a little curious to know and report what those two court rulings say, while still feeding people the whole Edward Snowden hoax, serve absolutely no useful purpose, with their recycled versions of mainstream 'news' media.

 

When 'news' media are paying courts off to even try to say the words that some 'news' media have special rights in courts, there is something very seriously wrong.

 

It is clear that the 'news' media who rally together to demand war, are wholly complicit in trying to subvert the people's rule of law so 'politics' can murder anyone for money.

To save lives, it is important to act upon the truth the US, EU and all colonial ’news’ media is every bit as rotten and murderous as ‘politics’ and only exists to advertise a system of failed ‘democracy’ which serves big business interests.

By all means ‘vote’ for whatever administrator you want, but do not ever presume or claim that administrator has any violent power beyond responsibly managing a few agreed public services.

 

19.10.2012 WAR PROTESTERS TELL LONDON EVENING STANDARD TO...'FUCK OFF'


when the London Evening Standard 'news' media, came down to harass us in the pouring rain over the government claiming an umbrella was a 'crime'...

 

The London Evening Standard didn't have much to go on, when they overheard that I told Neil, I had nothing to say to the media, who could 'fuck off' when they were harassing us taking pictures in the pouring rain, while saying an umbrella was a 'crime', after years on end of state abuse, where we hadn't actually gone anywhere...to come back...

 

In fact the Evening Standard lied when they claimed there was a court order against our campaign in what remain our proceedings against the Brit State, in the High Court, in HQ12X03564.

 

"...Tents and camping equipment are banned under a court order [there is no court order against our campaign] so they are huddling under umbrellas to continue their vigil.

 

The real underlying point is, what kind of sick and twisted moronic mindset actually goes to the effort of creeping round at night, taking pictures to publish alongside a 'news' story, dishonestly claiming it is a 'crime' to have an umbrella in the pouring rain ?

 

of course the 'news' media print such rubbish to try and help racist colonial pigs in brutal broken britain, continue writing legislative frauds that are not compatible with the rule of law, to rob and murder anyone they like.

 

As most people know none of us were on 'benefits' and one of the people was a...homeless veteran soldier...

 

Yet US & EU  'government' and 'news' media wholeheartedly support armed 'rebels' in Syria to illegally overthrow the Syrian government for them.

 

In fact the British Army would have zero recruits if they were not given weapons and...shelter, like tents.

The still racist and colonial ’news’ media are the enemy of decent and civilized people, everywhere.

 

RELATED:

 

22.10.2014 EU & US ‘GOVERNMENT’ MUST BE PUT IN THEIR PLACE, TO HAVE WORLD PEACE & GLOBAL PROSPERITY FOR HUMANITY

 

26.10.2014 MASTER OF MIDDLE EAST DECEIT, NOAM CHOMSKY FLATLINES IGNORING RULE OF LAW AT UN

 

27.10.2014 THE FALSE DICHOTOMY OF THE ‘LEFT & ‘RIGHT’ UK ‘GOVERNMENT’ & ‘NEWS’ MEDIA NARRATIVE THAT IS...ALL, VIOLENT & RACIST.