666: CITIZEN'S ARRESTS.
I do not actually "reasonably believe" the U.K State can articulate a specific "criminal offence" -I- would be committing in making lawful citizen's arrests, it is clearly necessary to make, to protect life.
666: not one of their smartest ideas.
To: babs tucker
Subject: RE: 666: CITIZEN'S ARRESTS ETC.[Not Protectively Marked] - [Not Protectively Marked]
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:08:04 +0000
Dear Ms Tucker,
It is not appropriate for me to predict the criminal offence that you may commit in making or attempting to make an unlawful arrest.
However my advice remains the same; the narrow parameters in which a 'citizen's arrest' is allowed in law do not include the circumstances that you describe and I strongly advise you not to embark on such an undertaking.
Detective Chief Inspector
Staff Officer to the Chief Constable
From: babs tucker
Subject: RE 666: CITIZEN'S ARRESTS ETC.[Not Protectively Marked] - [Not Protectively Marked]
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:17:56 +0000
FAO Chief Constable of Merseyside,
I refer to your email dated January 6th 2014.
I copy this to the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police & his brief, who I am making it clear, I will make citizen’s arrests of, so you can all agree and put in writing, to me, what specific criminal offence any maliciously claim I will unlawfully be arrested for, because if not one of you can cite a specific criminal offence I would be committing, in making even those two lawful citizen’s arrests, then I will use this email, to legally follow through on making -all- the necessary citizen’s arrests.
The Chief Constable of Merseyside needs to consider what I am writing very carefully, because this will go all the way to the European Courts...etc. because I will follow through and make the necessary citizen’s arrests.
A reasonable person would understand that my -only-purpose is to protect human life, which the Chief Constable of Merseyside, has shown, he is not willing to do, while worse -I- am illegally threatened with state violence, if I do lawfully act, to protect life.
It is not a sustainable position these days, that police officers, politicians and courts can avoid accountability under law, by using state violence.
A reasonable person could only understand that where the police have refused to act, I am legally entitled in law, to act, to...protect life.
The quite incontrovertible evidence is, that Parliament illegally invented legislation !!!! in late 2011, that they could not use against our campaign to try and prevent our existing and additional High Court civil actions -legally- bringing down the Houses of Parliament of all sides, by our doing nothing more extraordinary than...law.
On January 16th 2012, (for example) Superintendent Morgan from Charing Cross Police Station (who was accompanied by a City of London Police Officer) and many other police officers etc, was witnessed being filmed by Press TV when he was asked what police power he was using to steal our shelter, (which a reasonable person would know would put our lives at risk) to which Superintendent Morgan responded that Press TV had better ask the .....Press Office.....at New Scotland Yard (because there was no police power of seizure being used to steal our shelter)
I have clearly long been entitled to the most basic disclosures, over a massive and illegal police operation run out of the -media office- at New Scotland Yard.
You need all need to cite a specific criminal offence -I- would allegedly be committing in making a citizen’s arrest of anyone involved in that massive police operation, who a reasonable person would understand was intentionally threatening my own life, so that the U.K State could continue to murder whoever they liked.
You do also need to explain what is illegal about me specifically making a citizen’s arrest of 666 (who anyone can see with their own eyes, is clearly impersonating a police officer) and those involved in kidnapping Neil Kerslake off the street when we left the High Court on April 10th 2013.
It has also become clear to us that we were not simply being illegally “tracked” using ANPR, so there are numerous additional issues relating to illegal breaches of Article 8.
The problem is, the U.K state are NOT using "surveillance" to listen in on our doing...law, which is what we are doing. The U.K state are illegally using surveillance to violently censor, our doing...law, by illegally using state violence. That involves the most seriously illegal breaches of Article 8.
I am also legally entitled to arrest all those (for example) involved in attempting to murder me at Belgravia Police Station on September 4th 2009.
This includes Mr Forshaw from Weightman’s Solicitors who is illegally concealing all manner of evidence that I know he holds at his offices in Merseyside, that he has been legally obliged to disclose to me, for a very, very, very, very...long time.
A jury will understand that Mr Forshaw’s very deliberate failure only continues because he has the criminal intent, along with the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, to cause my death.
All I am saying is, there will be the rule of law, instead of police and courts, following orders from criminal bankers and politicians.
I -absolutely refuse- to stand by and do nothing, while the disgraceful criminals running the U.K government, continue to brutally -murder- whoever they like for big business, anywhere, because police officers and courts, are illegally preventing (through the use of state violence) our properly using a system to do...law...to stop them.
A reasonable person -will- understand that we do law, to protect life, while police, courts and politicians, play the system to murder whoever they like.
Our position remains clear. We will follow through and record and publish legal proceedings involving the criminal actions of public officials, that will clearly -legally- bring down the Houses of Parliament of all shades, along with much else.
The very fact that Parliament invented phoney legislation specifically to try and prevent our High Court civil actions, proves of itself, that I am right in...law.
I therefore remain legally entitled (without being subject to further state violence, including attempts to murder me) to make the necessary citizen’s arrests of those who obstruct the administration of justice.
And think about this.
There is going to be an -even worse- “situation”, should any “court” try to prevent our bringing those I have lawfully arrested, who are responsible for obstructing the administration of justice etc, before the...courts, because you are in effect saying, I cannot bring those I have lawfully arrested to your...police stations ?
Parliament Square Peace Campaign