Q: How can the U.K state track people - and - kidnap them when they want to ?

A: Get a phoney "arrest warrant" over a.....blanket !!!!

It's called clutching at straws.

At 7.26am You Tube still had not uploaded video.

And who is Sergeant 666 ?

And what is he really covering up ?

In the City of London,

Who are giving Ding Dong a big send off, next week.

Our Neil, who was kidnapped by City of London Police on April 10th 2013, after leaving the Royal Courts of Justice, was finally produced in Court 5 at City of Westminster Magistrates, nearly twenty four hours - after - he had been disappeared by the U.K Police state.

It's sort of like snakes and ladders.

With lots of snakes.

The whole food chain had been given a role to play, a line to peddle, to get to what - their - point was. 

They went to a lot of trouble.

The U.K state was not happy with the direction that a very many legal challenges by the Parliament Square Peace Campaign were heading, generally.

And they were not happy that they were no longer watching Parliament Square Peace campaigners dying in Parliament Square.

One of the things we had shown, was how you could save the taxpayer quite literally millions upon millions of pounds, by shutting down - ALL - the Magistrates Courts, most of whose business is done by summons.

We had shown that you could just appeal a - summons - direct to the Crown Court under Article 6 Right to Fair Trial (for example), without needing to actually appear and play the game at any Magistrates Court "trial", where they just push through a high "conviction" rate, by not keeping proper records of "proceedings".

Their job is to fuck law, just to collect ever bigger... fines.....to finance an ever bigger ....police state. 

And this is a far from legal system that has been imposed throughout a far from Common-wealth.  

Our point is, let's streamline the corrupt system and get back to real law, with less bad law, which will mean fewer cases, with ...more juries of the people, all the way up the food chain to ....the International Criminal Court.

And how about, while we are at it, we record and publish proceedings, online.

Then let all people see, just who the real big time criminals really are !!

The people know.

However, having the people involved in law, makes the old boys club blood run cold.

Their control of any legal system is their first & last bastion of defence.

And so it came to pass that in the year 2013, a man was actually arrested under warrant in the City of London, and held 24 hours, supposedly over owning ...a blanket...


    Neil Kerslake               666

The U.K state wanted to get us back into Magistrates Court under their terms.

But they had nothing to run with.

                           666 ?
And for a time in March, Babs and Neil had pretty much dropped entirely off their radar.

And the police wanted a way to know where they were - and - to be able to grab them.

666? What's with such an obvious cover - up?

So a warrant that allowed them to list car details, was their best bet.

They could keep tabs and grab on demand, to a point.

In fact, Babs and Neil did not re-enter the U.K until March 23rd 2013, when they were flagged, and stopped, at the border, but the timing was wrong for the police, because it was over a weekend, but less than two days before Babs was due at a jury trial at Southwark Crown Court, so Babs and Neil were sent on their way.

An unlawful arrest and false imprisonment then might be a bit too obvious.

And shock any jury of the people.

Instead the state had to delay the trial at Southwark Crown Court.

Then Babs suddenly filed a number of Applications and two listing questionnaires in the High Court last Monday, and the state just flipped.

And the phoney warrant was used. 

The police (CPS & Courts) had known it was likely that any summons - over - a blanket, would probably be appealed straight to the Crown Court.

So they had to pretend they did not know an address so they could get a warrant of first instance to grab Neil.

But even then, the Metropolitan Police could not put out an All Points Bulletin across all police forces, to arrest someone under warrant, over a ...blanket.

They need to keep that sort of political dirt quite close to home.

So they had to make what they would just later claim to be an administrative error, by using an albeit still weak story about a warrant for failing to appear for a ...breach of the peace.

To get Neil off the streets.

Then they could later, just change the reason they used to get him off the streets.

The idea was to get Neil before Westminster Magistrates Court....

And if they got lucky scoop Babs up in the process.

You see...

Our Neil has also been causing the state many problems.

And once they had Neil in court, all any old District Judge Dickhead was required to say was, well since you are here, let's not worry about asking any, let alone too many, questions, over - how - you ended up here.

Let's all just "move on".

To the bit where the court clerk gets to read out the serious sounding sound-bite.

How do you plead to ....failing to comply with a direction from a police officer under section da de da of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 on September 13th 2012 ?

It all - sounds - so serious.

Neil said he had "No case to answer".

Neil's a natural.

That response, surprised District Judge Dickhead, who persisted.

So Neil pointed out that the starting point way back, which covered the fake warrant and any prosecution was the ...fact that under S145 (5) of the so called Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011, the police only had twenty eight days to commence a prosecution.

District Judge Dickhead said he didn't know the law.

No shit Sherlock.

That was obvious.

But he should know the law that someone in his court is being prosecuted under.

The truth is, he did know what not very many people know, about what is such an obscure law, that was only created to apply to Babs, who surely would not last more than twenty eight days without...shelter after January 16th 2012.

The Judge knew, but he had a line to peddle, to get where he was told to go.

And he was nearly there.

at 2mins into video police say they are returning property because no prosecution is being brought within ....twenty eight days.

And then Neil mentioned the B word.


Neil eloquently told the wider court, how the - taxpayer - is funding the government kidnapping people off the streets over a.......blanket.

Then District Judge Dickhead of City of Westminster had an embarassed look about him, as he looked around the court and noticed that by now, people really were leaning forward, listening....

He knew he had to finish fast.

He said he didn't know if he could use bail to get Neil to come back.

But he was going to, anyway.

That was where he had been told to keep furiously peddling.

And so if Neil didn't return on April 25th 2013, he was told, he could be imprisoned.

Not for the blanket of course.

But for failing to appear.

Prison by the back door.

There is a struggle for control going on. 

And who would be asking questions about - how - Neil came to be in court, in the first place.

Certainly not District Judge Dickhead.

District Judge Dickhead didn't like it when our Steve mentioned on our way out, challenging bail at Crown Court.

And Babs just went on and on, all day in Court Four and Five, over and over, how everyone in the legal system should be ashamed of themselves, judges, prosecutors, lawyers, because only a fascist state would have a man arrested on warrant, sitting in cells, over a...blanket.

A blanket.

And one so called duty solicitor dared to say, he didn't have an opinion on that.

And Babs told him, he bloody well should.

So Babs is due back in the High Court on April 24th 2013, and Neil is due back in Westminster Magistrates Court on April 25th 2013.

The U.K state are desperate to disappear both, along with our Steve.

The blanket scenario looks very much like a state clutching at straws.

Trying to control people who are free.

To do much.

Steve has filed his own very interesting case in the High Court.

Master Kay and the Commissioner's brief obviously had a little chat quite late for a Friday afternoon.

From: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; babs tucker
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:03:42 +0100
Subject: Tucker v Commissioner of Police HQ12X01972

Dear Ms. Tucker and Mr. Forshaw

I would like to move the hearing related to whether there should be a jury trial in this matter presently listed for 2 pm on the 24th April 2013 to 10.00 am on the 24th April 2013 as I am not able to sit at 2 pm. I am sorry for any inconvenience caused. I would be very grateful if both parties would be so kind as to reply by e-mail confirming their availability. 

If the new hearing proves impossible we will have to search for another date but this may prove difficult.

Regards JK

Jervis Kay Q.C
Admiralty Registrar and Master
of the Queen's Bench Division
Rm E121 Royal Courts of Justice
+44 207 947 6831

From: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; babs tucker
Subject: RE: Tucker v Commissioner of Police HQ12X01972
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:10:45 +0000

Dear Master Kay,

Thank you for your email. I note the position. I can confirm that we will be able to attend at 10am on 24 April 2013.  

I look forward to hearing from you with confirmation that the hearing date has been moved to 10am subject to any difficulties Ms Tucker may have with the proposed change.

Yours sincerely

Martin Forshaw

Weightmans LLP
DDI : 0151 242 7949
e-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

From: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; babs tucker
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:01:19 +0100
Subject: RE: Tucker v Commissioner of Police HQ12X01972

Thank you. Subject to Ms Tuckers response please assume that the hearing has been moved to 10 am

Regards JK

Jervis Kay Q.C

Admiralty Registrar and Master
of the Queen's Bench Division
Rm E121 Royal Courts of Justice
+44 207 947 6831

And the Mayor of London Boris Johnson does not want Babs in Southwark Crown Court singing like a canary - before - a jury on May 7th 2013.

Stories about sleep deprivation and blankets will look odd to the man on the Clapham Omnibus.

That's us.

The people.

And they simply do not know what to do about all these civil claims lining up in the High Court where the Peace Campaign are prosecuting ...the police, before ...juries.

All that remains a mystery is, who is Sergeant 666 ?

The numbers so obviously add up to cover up, when you compare them to the other pigs numbers.

..The Dream ?...........Cloud cuckoo land.... remember your..rights?                       

never leave a man down behind enemy lines....