11.04.2013:
UK POLICE STATE:
PARLIAMENT SQUARE PEACE CAMPAIGNER
NEIL KERSLAKE KIDNAPPED
& CURRENTLY BEING
HELD AT BISHOPSGATE POLICE STATION

UPDATED @ 05:45:57

A man we love has been kidnapped by the U.K police state.


Neil
"Never have so many, made so much, out of a....blanket ???? !!!!"

Around half four on April 10th 2013, Babs and Neil walked out of the Royal Courts of Justice in London, not knowing the police were lying in wait, after a hearing over the illegal seizure by the Metropolitan Police, in May 2006.

   
Neil providing lots of personal details.
10th April 2013: City of London 5.30pm      
FAKE WARRANT
a copy of the phoney warrant was provided when Babs and two other members of the campaign went to Bishopsgate Police Station and made a formal complaint against police that they did not have a valid warrant, which they have still not provided. The warrant below, has no number, is not signed or stamped by a court and incorrectly lists Neil's address as c/o Charing Cross Police Station (an earlier summons shown further down page proves Charing Cross had his address.
 

POLICE SOCIAL REFORM & RESPONSIBILITY ACT 2011
On 13.09.2012:
Under Section 145(5) any "summons" had to be issued within twenty eight days.

No summons was issued within twenty eight days, despite the fact that the police had Neil's address, personal email address, phone number and his email address... on this website, which they bizarrely follow on Twitter (which we do not use)



On 13.09.2012: The Metropolitan Police had left satisfied they had all the personal details they wanted/needed from Neil Kerslake.

Sleep Deprivation: The police say "you are not allowed to sleep", "it is all about political control".

A previous "summons" in case (see video below) Neil won, proving Charing Cross had his address all along.




10.04.2013: City of London Police 5.30pm.
THE REAL STORY TO FOLLOW.......

04:21:30



From: babs tucker

To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

CC:

cccmailbox-commissioner'This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.



Subject: UK POLICE STATE: THE KIDNAP OF NEIL KERSLAKE.

Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 04:55:15 +0100

10-11.04.2013: POLICE STATE: THE KIDNAP OF NEIL KERSLAKE.

Gentlemen,

Never have so many, made so much, out of ...a...BLANKET ????? !!!!!!

There is a real man I love, you have all hurt, who you knew was seriously ill.

I have seen him be brave, courageous and really make a difference, and so I only love him, all the more.  

I am genuinely unimpressed by the truly disgraceful actions of the police, upon Neil and I leaving the Royal Courts of Justice today, following a hearing into one of an existing number of already massive civil claims against the Metropolitan Police.

A further hearing (because the court had failed to notify Babs of this hearing) into the fact the Metropolitan Police are trying to raise specious reasons to prevent our prosecuting our claim against them - before a jury - over the illegal seizure on May 23rd 2006 was arranged today by Master Kay, in the High Court, to take place on April 23rd 2013.

You will recall that I was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned on the old chestnut of breach of the peace on May 23rd 2006.

The actions of the police today have only strengthened our argument for jury trial.

It could not be any clearer that the police have no defence to any of our civil claims.

Clearly the actions of the police attempting to harass and - intimidate - us while we have claims before the High Court, is a further Contempt of Court.

In fact, following today, it appears, the High Court will need to create a whole new department devoted to dealing with the civil claims of members of our Parliament Square Peace Campaign.

I will now need to personally file a further 40 + civil claims variously involving numerous unlawful arrests, false imprisonments and malicious prosecutions.

And I can certainly promise you that I will be filing the Application for the mandatory jury trial, under S 69 (1) of the Supreme Court Act 1981, where we will be prosecuting the Metropolitan Police before a jury even - before - the Metropolitan Police serve any so called "defence".

This will mean - years - of jury trials ahead, involving our campaign prosecuting the police in the High Court.

Many juries will indeed, be shocked to realise the police state they are already living in.   

After Neil and I left the court today, City Of London Police were at the behest of the Metropolitan Police, laying in wait for us to briefly pass through the environs of the City of London.

We had stopped in traffic when we noticed a City of London police van making it's way through the traffic, with it's blue sirens flashing. When it got to us, police asked us to pull over and get out of the vehicle.

(see pics attached)

After a time, Neil was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned.

To say I was shocked and appalled is an understatement.

Police are aware that they unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned a seriously ill man.  

The City of London police falsely claimed that Neil was wanted on an arrest warrant for failing to appear over a breach of the peace.

Information on his vehicle, had been placed on the PNC by the Metropolitan Police whose area we had also passed through without incident.

I pointed out that we had in fact, just been in the High Court with the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police's solicitor, Mr Forshaw, who had not mentioned any such warrant.

The City of London Police also had no information as to when the alleged arrest and charge for "breach of the peace" were alleged to have occurred although this information would - also - have to be on the PNC.

I asked where the ANPR was that had picked the vehicle out, because the police van did not have ANPR and the police lamely claimed it was a short way back on the road.

We pointed out that it was impossible that an arrest warrant had been issued as the police claimed, not least because Neil had never even been arrested or charged with any breach of the peace, but the van load of police nevertheless kidnapped Neil and took him to Bishops-gate Police Station.

I then went to Bishopsgate Police Station with two other members of the campaign.

I asked to put in a  formal complaint on the grounds that I knew no such warrant over an alleged charge of breach of the peace could ever have existed.

The police finally admitted that what I was saying was true and tried to claim incorrect information had been put into the computer.

And so was Neil released ?

No.

The story changed.

As indeed the PNC must also have changed at a time the police could not explain.

It was then alleged and I was shown a copy of the PNC police refused to hand over despite Neil giving his permission for me to have a copy, showing that a warrant had been issued on March 7th 2013 that they claimed was placed on the PNC on March 21st 2013.

I pointed out this was impossible, because I could prove that we had been pulled over together in the same car - entering - the U.K on March 23rd 2013,  when we had been illegally held for around half an hour or so while border police took our documents away, without giving any reason for doing so, before returning them, without being able to find any problem.

It is also the case that we were for example at Southwark Crown Court on March 25th 2013, when this same vehicle was driven into a car park within City Of London. We clearly entered and left through the City of London and went to court.

The police then falsely alleged that Neil had failed to appear over an alleged offence under the PRSR Act 2011.

However, when I was shown a copy of the warrant, it was not in fact a bench warrant for failing to appear.

Indeed the police knew the warrant was defective for any number of reasons, which are fairly obvious looking at it.

(see attached pic of warrant)

It was a fraudulent warrant, that has no number and is not signed, where it appears Charing Cross Police are falsely claiming they did not have Neil's details, and get this…. to serve any summons over his having a -  ****BLANKET ****- on September 13th 2013.

Yet it is possible to see from videos on September 13th 2012, that police accepted they did have details given by Neil, not only on September 13th 2012.

(see attached videos)

Attached is another summons over a case involving a tent where Neil won, showing that indeed - both - Westminster Magistrates and Metropolitan Police had an address for Neil.

And to think that it was only an hour earlier, I was explaining to Mr Forshaw, in the listing office in the High Court, that I had one of those - jury trials - he so despises, over September 13th 2012, in Southwark Crown Court, involving the Mayor of London.

Indeed I also explained to the City of London police that the Mayor of London's bod had explained - IN WRITING - that the Mayor of London was not prosecuting anyone over September 13th 2012, under the PRSR Act 2011.

Of course the police, courts (and Mayor of London) all know:

that under S145(5) of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011:

that any summons under the PRSR Act 2011 would have had to be served within twenty eight days, (or the property returned) and the police simply cannot argue, that they could not serve a summons, in that time frame.

Not least, because any number of videos show police and Neil.

Of course, City of London preferred to continue to hold Neil, rather than actually read what the legislation says.

You cannot arrest homeless people for having sleeping equipment such as sleeping bags.

So it speaks volumes about the police state we live in that Neil could ever be arrested and imprisoned, albeit maliciously, using the pretext of a warrant over a ……….BLANKET !!!!!

Perhaps that is something else Mr Rentoul from the Independent, can celebrate.

The Commissioner of the Metropolis, the CPS and City of Westminster Magistrates need to call Bishopsgate Police (who this is copied to) to tell them to immediately release Neil who really has been kidnapped.   

I copy all to Birds Solicitors who we contacted and asked to represent Neil.

And I copy to Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and the U.K representatives on the Venice Commission, because you will either highlight what is really going on in the U.K or you are part of the problem.

Babs Tucker
Parliament Square Peace Campaign
www.brianhaw.tv


From: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

To: babs tucker; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; neil kerslake; steve jago

Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:41:41 +0100

Subject: RE: Claim Number HQ12X01972


The parties must attend court today. If it is the case that the Claimant was given insufficient notice of the hearing or if the avaiable time will be insufficient to hear any application effectively then an alternative date will have to be found and it would be sensible and helpful if the parties attended, at least for that purpose. In the event that parties do nto attend the court has the power to hear the issue or matter in their absence.
Regards JK

Jervis Kay Q.C

Admiralty Registrar and Master
of the Queen's Bench Division
Rm E121 Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
LONDON WC2A 2LL
+44 207 947 6831




05:09:40





LINK: 10.04.2013: THATCHERS DEAD, BUT THE PEOPLE LIVE ON & WE GO BACK TO THE HIGH COURT TO DO...LAW.

" In a time of universal deceit, law abiding civilians trying to restore the real democracy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law is an evolutionary act."

 

(adapted from George Orwell)