DAY 4265: MONDAY FEBRUARY 4TH 2013.
A civil claim continues.
23rd May 2006
I don't believe that the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police can spin the truth so that a jury could agree that:
On May 23rd 2006 (when 78 Metropolitan Police used £111,000 !!!! of taxpayers money),
a) the Metropolitan Police "reasonably believed" I was a "criminal" when I was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned etc.
b) that any police officer "reasonably believed" that S3(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967 was ever a "police power of seizure" !!!! that could be used when the now repealed, SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138, did not even have any police power of "seizure".
The only "sanctions" the now discredited SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138 had, were fines or imprisonment for showing too much evidence of war crimes.
It is interesting that the courts have not struck out such a blatantly false "defence" that was submitted by the police.
And it is quite appalling that a law firm is taking very large amounts of taxpayers money to try and peddle such lies.
Which came first ?
Real law about war crimes or bad law to try and cover up war crimes ?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
CC: babs tucker; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Subject: RE: Tucker -v- The Commissioner of Police Case Number HQ12XC1972
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:12:01 +0000
Case Management Conference
11.30am
Monday 4 February 2013
Dear Master Kay Q.C. ,
My firm represent the Defendant in the above case.
I attach a case summary and draft directions in anticipation of the Case Management Conference later this morning.
The proposed directions are not agreed by the Claimant.
Yours sincerely
Martin Forshaw
Partner
Police Team
Weightmans LLP
DDI : 0151 242 7949
e-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
www.weightmans.com
From: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
To: babs tucker
Subject: Tucker -v- The Commissioner of Police Case Number HQ12XC1972
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:53:06 +0000
Ms Tucker,
I note that you did not attend the Case Management Conference before Master Kay QC this morning.
I attach a sealed copy of the order made by the Master by way of service. Please acknowledge receipt.
Yours sincerely
Martin Forshaw
Partner
Police Team
Weightmans LLP
DDI : 0151 242 7949
e-mail : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
www.weightmans.com
From: babs tucker
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Subject: FW: Tucker -v- The Commissioner of Police Case Number HQ12XC1972
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:11:33 +0000
To clarify Gentlemen,
It is agreed that is a single judge - and - jury (which is what I am legally entitled to) ?
Kind regards,
Babs Tucker
---------------
