In a time of universal deceit, the people
telling the truth is an evolutionary act.(adapted from George Orwell)
A global community of big business
or a global community of people ?
The people decide...
Day 5020:
All the EU & US-led corporate global business states consider is,
who will challenge their legal nihilism, and are they serious.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.
First...Europeans came for Native Americans, Africans, Asians and Aboriginals, before they occupied the Arab Middle East.
no-one is as ignorant as nato propaganda claims it is, and wants civilian populations to be...
NATO is a system of illegal legislation and taxation that violently oppresses civilians at home and murders civilians abroad because that is what generates the greatest revenue for big business.
It is society's rule of law that really only allows public space for a few administrators (call them whatever you like, including 'politicians' if you must) to responsibly manage a very few agreed public services, which could easily be funded fairly through (for example) one tax on the luxury goods civilians can afford to buy.
Our practical civilian resistance to the long Genocidal still colonial British state, will continue to bring society's rule of -law- (which should not be conflated with 'legislation') into all we do, as we hold what is the military dictatorship of the corporate British 'democracy' to account, to protect life.
It is the civilian voice of society's rule of law, NOT 'politics' or 'news' media, that the law abiding majority of decent and civilized civilians agree governs society, regardless of who people do or do not 'vote' for.
Why stop with as our campaign has proved is possible, the repeal of one violent legislative fraud ?
You may assume if our website is offline from time, to time, that the U.K Attorney General
who has a track record of illegal state censorship, of our campaign, is involved.
who has a track record of illegal state censorship, of our campaign, is involved.
"...When the press backed the war in Iraq, when both sides of the house backed the war in Iraq, Brian stood up to the Government," she says. Pink Dr Martens and 40 arrests notwithstanding, she has an easy-going charm. "And he turned out to be right, didn't he? If you believe in democracy, Brian is what democracy looks like...she and Mr Haw have been dragged to and from police cells and the courts in increasingly complex attempts by the authorities to get rid of them..." (Independent Newspaper)
NATO & TURKEY'S GENOCIDAL WAR ON SYRIA
The groundbreaking and definitive expose, NATO & TURKEY'S GENOCIDAL WAR ON SYRIA, by Cem Ertur, sets a new standard in terms of the real information, the law abiding majority, need and want.
Cem Ertur's report dramatically contrasts with and replaces, the stale apologias of phoney 'left' propagandists, such as Hersh & Fisk.
Hersh's completely wicked sophistry (in...London 'Review' of 'Books') is utterly devoid of legal facts on the ground in...Britain.
____________
01.01.2013: SERENA SHIM'S PRESS TV REPORT FROM INSIDE TURKEY: TURKEY'S PIVOTAL ROLE IN SYRIAN WAR.
(Serena Shim was killed in Turkey on October 19th 2014, shortly after Turkish intelligence accused her of being a spy)
BRIAN HAW: 7th JANUARY 1949 - 18th JUNE 2011
"The marchers should not just have one day out in the sunshine,
they should stay" -- Brian Haw (on the BBC, September 2002)
26.04.2012: A STATUE FOR BRIAN HAW... A PROJECT BY AMANDA WARD
09.01.2013: INDEPENDENT: A STATUE FOR BRIAN HAW
WOULD BE A FITTING TRIBUTE TO A MAN OF PEACE
02.06.2011: INDEPENDENT: PEACE IN OUR TIME? UK's MOST
FAMOUS PROTEST PASSES TEN YEAR MILESTONE
BRITISH IN-"JUSTICE"
...will continue to "offend" as she shows "no regard" for the "British Justice System"
source: Belgravia Police "Custody" Record 02.04.2012
"called a ...criminal...by violent self serving illegal corporate...legislation"
_______________________________
"...Mr Cameron [current UK PM] today told Sky News' Sunday Live a future Tory government would [illegally use the entire apparatus of the violent corporate state to] take steps to have it [Parliament Square Peace Campaign] removed...
"...I am all for demonstrations, but my argument is `Enough is enough'."
David Cameron & Co could not take or hold Parliament Square, while our civilian resistance remains far more interested in seeing his signed and dated witness statement over the 'steps' he nevertheless illegally took.
______________________________
Corporate legislation the murderous British State specifically made to try to violently criminalize and try to smash our long-standing campaign:
we proved civilians could get illegal legislation...repealed
(our High Court jury claim seeking the next repeal, against the British government over the latest legislation in the British High Court, is HQ12X03564)
These are some of our High Court proceedings: (which do not include the very many more malicious prosecutions brought against our campaign, in Magistrates and Crown Courts)
1. Westminster City Council v Haw [2002] EWHC 2073 (QB)
(04 October 2002)
2. Haw, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2005] EWHC 2061 (Admin) (29 July 2005)
3. Haw, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 532 (08 May 2006)
4. Director of Public Prosecutions v Haw [2007] EWHC 1931 (Admin) (06 August 2007)
5. Tucker v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] EWHC 3019 (Admin) (30 November 2007)
6. Haw & Anor v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court [2007] EWHC 2960 (Admin) (12 December 2007)
7.Haw v Southwark Crown Court & Commissioner of Police (Interested Party: Tucker)(CO/11393/2007)
8. The Mayor of London v Hall & Ors (Rev 1) [2010] EWHC 1613 (QB) (29 June 2010)
9. Hall & Ors v Mayor of London (On Behalf of the Greater London Authority) [2010] EWCA Civ 817 (16 July 2010)
10.The Mayor of London (Greater London Authority) v Haw & Ors [2011] EWHC 585 (QB) (17 March 2011)
11. HQ11X00563: WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL v TUCKER (DISCONTINUED)
(04 October 2002)
2. Haw, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2005] EWHC 2061 (Admin) (29 July 2005)
3. Haw, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 532 (08 May 2006)
4. Director of Public Prosecutions v Haw [2007] EWHC 1931 (Admin) (06 August 2007)
5. Tucker v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] EWHC 3019 (Admin) (30 November 2007)
6. Haw & Anor v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court [2007] EWHC 2960 (Admin) (12 December 2007)
7.Haw v Southwark Crown Court & Commissioner of Police (Interested Party: Tucker)(CO/11393/2007)
8. The Mayor of London v Hall & Ors (Rev 1) [2010] EWHC 1613 (QB) (29 June 2010)
9. Hall & Ors v Mayor of London (On Behalf of the Greater London Authority) [2010] EWCA Civ 817 (16 July 2010)
10.The Mayor of London (Greater London Authority) v Haw & Ors [2011] EWHC 585 (QB) (17 March 2011)
11. HQ11X00563: WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL v TUCKER (DISCONTINUED)
Our -counterclaim- in HQ11X00563 remains outstanding.
We have a number of existing ground-breaking High Court claims against the British government incl. HQ12X01972 (the massive police raid on May 23rd 2006), HQ12X02745, HQ12X03564 (the massive police raid on January 16th 2012) & HQ13X03488.
Our case against the British government is put simply, that the British government attempts to illegally try to murder campaign members and smash our campaign -because- the British government is committing Genocide.
the rise of the...law abiding...majority.
"...never before seen...rebellion which is anti-elite... anti-press..."
Every single day, billions of people all around the world, unlike corporate 'politicians' and their many layers of propagandists including the heavily 'filtered' news media, continue to not harm anyone else.
The people's rule of law can (ie: nationally) both prosecute war criminals (using universal jurisdiction & the precedent of Nuremberg) and as our campaign has proved, repeal violent corporate 'legislation'.
The European Court of Human Rights was specifically created to uphold Nuremberg, through oversight of EU 'governments'.
War, which is always illegal and only ever started for financial interests, only ever targets civilians, to try to murder real resistance, that will only ever come from the people, who are always the law abiding majority.
"...war did not just happen it was planned and prepared for over a long period of time and with no small skill and cunning....
...the entire structure of offices and officials was dedicated to the criminal purposes and committed to the use of the criminal methods planned by these defendants and their co-conspirators...
...always contemplated not merely overcoming current opposition but exterminating elements which could not be reconciled with its philosophy of the state.
We have here the surviving top politicians, militarists, financiers, diplomats, administrators, and propagandists... Who was responsible for these crimes if they were not?
.....this declaration of the law has taken them by surprise....they really are surprised that there is any such thing as law.
International law, natural law, any law at all was to these men simply a propaganda device to be invoked when it helped and to be ignored when it would condemn what they wanted to do.
...the ultimate step in avoiding wars, which are inevitable in a system of international lawlessness, is to make statesmen responsible to law...[Nuremberg]
...the entire structure of offices and officials was dedicated to the criminal purposes and committed to the use of the criminal methods planned by these defendants and their co-conspirators...
...always contemplated not merely overcoming current opposition but exterminating elements which could not be reconciled with its philosophy of the state.
We have here the surviving top politicians, militarists, financiers, diplomats, administrators, and propagandists... Who was responsible for these crimes if they were not?
.....this declaration of the law has taken them by surprise....they really are surprised that there is any such thing as law.
International law, natural law, any law at all was to these men simply a propaganda device to be invoked when it helped and to be ignored when it would condemn what they wanted to do.
...the ultimate step in avoiding wars, which are inevitable in a system of international lawlessness, is to make statesmen responsible to law...[Nuremberg]
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
Our old website www.parliament-square.org.uk was hijacked by the British government and transferred in June 2013, to a rather opaque tooth fairy, called Jonathan Mallia, in Malta. That website, which is untruthful, does not reflect, and is not associated with our continuing campaign (refer: background)
Likewise the Wikipedia entry on Brian Haw does not reflect our campaign and was not endorsed by Brian Haw. The Wikipedia entry, mainly comprises mainstream media inventions, that have been added by people we do not know, that mostly just repeat the "official government" lies, about our campaign. Two links that direct to our campaign, have been added with our knowledge to the Wikipedia entry, on Brian, although the "supporters" link on Wikipedia, still goes to the old hijacked website. refer: "It's the Kids Stupid" written by Brian in December 2010, on this website.
BACKGROUND
BANNERS
Law: Jus Cogens & Human Rights trump Queen
*NEW* Universal Economic Model: Replacing Borders with Boundaries
