It is clear that contrary to the widely disseminated propaganda, the U.S govt. know that the unfettered power their U.S Kill Lists and Drone Strikes, give themselves, is absolutely unlawful.
Events in Ukraine prove, they are calling -anyone- who disagrees with them a 'terrorist'.
16.04.2014 FAO DIRECTOR OF CIA: UNFETTERED POWER IS ABSOLUTELY UNLAWFUL.
I refer to your public statement on the legality of ‘Kill Lists’ and Drones, dated April 30th 2012 at the Wilson Centre, which can be filed, by anyone, as evidence in a court of law.
As part of a much wider law abiding...majority, I note with serious concern, that the U.S govt, routinely falsely claim that people who have nothing whatsoever to do with Al-Qaeda, who disagree with the U.S govt (or indeed the British govt) are either called ‘criminals’ or ‘terrorists’ by governments and their media propagandists.
It is widely understood that such malice is intended and used to facilitate, wholly illegal state violence.
Given that Kill Lists and Drone Strikes, are not and could not be used against far better armed government leaders, only further highlights their use is disproportionate etc.
In particular I point out that both the CIA and their coup leaders in Ukraine know, (and have therefore not sought any legal proceedings to show otherwise), that it is entirely law abiding for people in Eastern Ukraine, (the CIA and their coup leaders maliciously call...‘terrorists’), to withhold -consent- to be ‘governed’ by Kiev.
It is quite shocking that even elderly women in Eastern Ukraine are being called terrorists and threatened with military force, because they quite understandably feel the need, to withhold -consent- to be governed by the wholly disagreeable likes of your coup leaders, like Svoboda and Right Sector who no European leader would want to parade alongside, in their own country.
Clearly the rule of law (which exists to protect life) and government are two entirely different entities.
The fact that Scotland are about to have a referendum over independence, without being called terrorists and so on, speaks volumes, about the 5 billion dollar U.S ‘destabilisation’ program in Ukraine.
Therefore kindly confirm in writing by email is fine:
a) how the arbitrary U.S govt. ‘Kill List” and drone strikes could possibly comply with the rule of law that makes -unfettered- power (which is what your statement outlines) absolutely unlawful.
b) that the U.S govt. CIA & USAF will cease and desist using ‘Kill Lists’ and drone strikes, because unfettered power is absolutely unlawful under the rule of law.
The true facts and rule of law are particularly important to establish, as a matter of urgency, given that the illegal coup in Ukraine proves the U.S govt, are obviously fraudulently claiming anyone who disagrees with them is a ‘terrorist’, who state military power can be used against, which obviously has very serious consequences.
Parliament Square Peace Campaign
This definitive report by Cem Ertur, on the Syrian War, highlights the integral role, the Turkish government play within the alliance of western governments.
The groundbreaking article, sets a new standard in providing the necessary information people want and need.
The article reveals evidence that can be used in a legal challenge, in Europe against NATO, and Turkey.
by Cem Ertur, Axis of Logic 07.04.2014.
“President [Obama] has been clear: Any [military] action that he might decide to take will be a limited and tailored response to ensure that a despot’s brutal and flagrant use of chemical weapons is held accountable.”
[U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, speech at the U.S. State Department, Washington D.C., 30 August 2013] 1
“What matters is to weaken the regime to the point where it gives up power. [...] What matters is to repeat here the Kosovo [War] precedent. Otherwise, [just] a 24 hours hit-and-run wouldn't work.”
[Turkey's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, press remarks at the Victory Day reception, Cankaya presidential residence, Ankara, 30 August 2013]2
On March 16, the third anniversary of the NATO-led covert war on Syria, Syrian army won a landmark victory by taking back the Yabroud town on the Lebanese border.3 Hours later, NATO-backed ‘Al-Nusra Front in Lebanon’ retaliated by launching a false-flag bombing attack in Lebanon.4 On March 18-19, the Israeli army bombarded Syrian Army positions by tank and artillery fire and airstrikes.5
On March 21, NATO-backed mercenary forces and Turkish Armed Forces launched a massive offensive on the Syrian border town of Kasab in the Latakia province. The unprecedented overt military aggression by Turkey and its NATO allies is the clearest indication of their desperation in the face of Syria’s steady progress towards a decisive victory on all fronts.
This article details the flagrant war crimes committed by Turkey and NATO during the ongoing offensive on Kasab and puts them in a context.