In a time of universal deceit, trying to restore the real democracy of the autonomy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law, which is the natural human state, is an evolutionary act.
BRIAN HAW :: 7th January 1949 - 18th June 2011
NEIL KERSLAKE :: 12th September 1958 - 1st October 2020
A violent global anarchy of big business
or a global community of people ?
The law abiding majority of civilians decide...
There are those who just talk about freedom and those of us who have proved how we make it a reality for everyone.
... brian and babs, bestest friends...
There is unlimited potential in clean renewable energy to develop and build capacity in sustainable infrastructure to lessen inequality and make everyone healthy and wealthy. This means people will also have the freedom to choose their own cultural identity.
N.B This is not a 'news site' (ie:the he said/she said etc of media).
I remember Brian (18.06.2019)
... I remember Brian... because I was there... and what we did was real...
Brian Haw was the greatest peacemaker of our times.
Donna ‘Black-Cat’ Bugat: A Global Peace Deal (14.01.2020)
It is not legally possible for politicians to 'overtake' civil jury lawsuits against them, by any means.
I think everyone should have their own global peace deal, because the more peace there really is, the better for everyone.
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: The British monarchy & Australian Governor Generals give royal assent to my universal injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ because I did not ever give my informed consent as a child or adult (24.10.2020)
...my name is donna...
IN THE MATTER OF MY UNIVERSAL INJUNCTION TO STOP MY ‘ADOPTION’ IN CASE 352 IN COUNTY COURT IN MELBOURNE, THAT I DID NOT EVER GIVE MY INFORMED CONSENT TO AS A CHILD OR ADULT.
by Donna Bugat
Date of Document: 5th October 2020
Filed by: Donna Bugat
Prepared by: Donna Bugat
1. My name in Donna Bugat and I am an Australian citizen who was born in Carlton, Melbourne, Australia on 10 February 1962.
2. I am legally notifying courts of my universal injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ in Case 352 in the County Court in Melbourne, that I have never given my informed consent to, as either a child or adult.
My universal injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ which I did not ever give my informed consent to as a child or adult, will be filed in the relevant courts in all Australian states, and in the High Court in the UK with my High Court Order from April 2008, and the ECHR, along with the Hague Convention on ‘Intercountry adoptions’.
The British monarchy and Australian governor generals agree to give royal assent to my injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ that I did not ever give informed consent to as a child or adult, along with amended legislation to require the informed consent of children and adults to their adoptions too, along with adopted children's qualified right to discharge adoptions, and adult adopted people's absolute right to an automatic discharge of adoptions, all at no personal or financial cost to adopted people.
The fact anyone could be adopted for any number of reasons, does not provide legal grounds for lifelong adoption, but does highlight the additional legal 'complexities' involved in adoption cases, which in also involving issues of 'family law', means adopted people should not be discriminated against and treated differently compared to 'family law' cases not involving adoptions.
It must mandatory for all adopted children and adults to have legal representation, including that is independent, in their adoption cases.
All children are like adults supposed to be taught about the need for their informed consent, that equally applies to all adopted children and adults too.
All courts have a legal obligation to politely send out non adversarial questionnaires to adopted children and adults at an address agreed to by the adopted person to:
a) ensure informed consent is appropriately explained to adopted children according to their age, along with informing adopted children who they can speak to if it is necessary to have their case referred back to court, regarding informed consent
b) inquire before adopted people become adults, if the adopted person would like to continue their adoption as adults (it should never be possible for people to not even know they are adopted)
c) acknowledge that if adopted people do not choose to give informed consent for their adoption to continue as adults, it will at no cost to the adopted adult person, be automatically discontinued upon the adopted person becoming an adult, or at any time thereafter
d) agree proper provision for counselling, social welfare and suitable housing is provided upon request by the adopted person, to the adopted person, during any transition period, relating to the discontinuance of an adoption, regardless of whether or not the adopted person is a child or adult, living in Australia or elsewhere, or if the adoption that originated through a court in Australia is national or international.
3. In practise, my injunction means that according to private international law:
a) no public official anywhere, will ever be able to claim my adoption in Case 352 in the County Court of Melbourne, in the State of Victoria in Australia, continues
b) I do not have to pay any arbitrarily decided sum of money to public officials or indeed anyone else, anywhere, to exercise my absolute right to as an adult refuse to give informed consent for my adoption to continue
c) I am properly compensated for the longstanding failure to recognise the need for my informed consent to my adoption.
4. The simple legal reality is that without being able to exercise my absolute right to as an adult not give my informed consent for my ‘adoption’ to continue, it is impossible for me to give inextricably linked informed consent that is in any way meaningful, regarding health care.
5. I am claiming $3 million dollars in compensation which is tax free and cannot be means tested from the State of Victoria who will also pay any costs of any court issuing their stamped copy of my universal injunction to send to me, by email, is fine.
The State of Victoria will also pay any ‘excess costs’ on any global annual fully comprehensive travel, health and insurance policies of my choosing which means, pre-existing health conditions are included, along with legal representation.
The State of Victoria also confirm I am in addition, also eligible to claim disability support pension, from the Federal government, wherever I choose to live, in Australia and elsewhere, because my being subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment, including physical and emotional torture which has caused me prolonged PTSD etc, means the rules of non refoulement apply.
The universal rules regarding non refoulement mean no public official in Australia can stop me peacefully entering or leaving the country, at any time.
6. The published legal records in the High Court in the UK in 2011 regarding a malicious prosecution brought against me in 2010 (that went back and forth between the Court of Appeal, all while I was denied legal representation) confirm it is not legally possible (ie: it is an abuse of process) to ‘overtake’ existing lawsuits (ie: my High Court Order from April 2008 in the UK) including to award costs against me (which the High Court confirmed they could not do) because the universal legal reality is everyone, regardless of who they are, are legally obliged to first and foremost swear allegiance to the due process of the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
7. I do give my informed consent for anyone to have a stamped court copy of my injunction, because adopted people do need to know our informed consent is a very important universal right.
The best world there can be for everyone is one filled with the love of family and friends.
Signed by Donna Bugat
in the State of Victoria this
5th day of October 2020
Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxx, 22450, Brittany, France.
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: There are no legal, political, religious or health grounds to oppose my adopted person led reform with the freedom of my universal injunction to stop my international ‘adoption’ (25.10.2020)
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: The freedom of permanent universal injunction with compensation, to take back control of our lives & stop 'adoption' is adopted persons only 'insurance policy' in biased 'experiment' lacking basic safeguards incl. guarantee of legal representation (26.10.2020)
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: Australian (fmr) Labour PM Kevin Rudd’s $1.4 billion dollar Tory UK contracts laundered through wife’s company to cover up torture & attempted murder of me… because I am legally entitled to universal injunction to stop ‘adoption’ (27.10.2020)
I was raised by the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services who posed as my parents and godparents in the ‘adoption’ assimilation ‘experiment’ I have never given my informed consent to as either a child or adult.
The published legal records in the UK, when I was actively repealing the ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 free speech ban there (that included arbitrary ‘conditions’ imposed to try and limit us to 20 people within 3 metres that were proven to be ‘unworkable’ and therefore unlawful) prove the lifelong ‘bureaucrat’ and former Australian Labour PM (who like his far from 'humanitarian' wife, are certainly not ‘victims’ of Murdoch) was specifically recruited to be the Australian PM in 2007, to try and hide the political classes et al knew I am legally entitled to an injunction to stop my ’adoption’ along with compensation.
It all began to unravel in the High Court in the UK in April 2008, when I got a High Court Order, and then again in the High Court on 21st June 2010, when everyone tried to 'overtake' my High Court Order, which is why I was then illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010, while Rudd switched from being the PM in Australia to the Foreign Minister, because he was trying to cover up the records at DFAT which include witnesses in the UK, that directly implicate him in the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK.
The charlatan Rudd with his $1.2 billion dollar Tory UK government contracts (part of the ‘zero hours contracts’ racket) along with Johnson (who was Mayor of London then) and Starmer (who was the DPP then) were always working together to cover up the torture and attempted murder of me (the CCTV exists) precisely because they did always know I am legally entitled to a universal injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ along with compensation.
The fact my universal injunction to stop my adoption, along with compensation, can’t change what has already happened, can however help stop it continuing, and protect other ‘adopted’ people from unscrupulous racketeers like Rudd et al.
My injunction to stop my 'adoption' highlights of itself what a fraud Rudd is, along with other politicians and their crocodile tears over 'forced adoption' while I was in Parliament Square in Central London !! and they had illegal access to personal information they profited from, before I was exiled to France, which Rudd directly profited from too.
It is self evident, the only self serving opposition, politicians et al have, to injunctions from adopted people to stop forced 'adoptions' is because the 'experiments' were always intended to be forced 'assimilation'.
I obviously did not ever 'apply' or pay to be ‘adopted’ so it is self evident, I do not have to pay any ‘court fees’ that would have to be waived, for my injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ along with compensation.
I originally travelled to the UK when I was four years old, when our beautiful boy from Barry in Wales was a young lad doing the early morning bread run, before he started playing golf.
… i feel your presence, my gentle darling with the most beautiful eyes…
NEIL KERSLAKE 12th September 1958 - 1st October 2020
The beauty of life includes humanity has unlimited capacity to do good.
... my super mario brothers...
... my sons make the world a better place...
There have always been indigenous Jewish people living around the Mediterranean who are just as entitled to have at least one state like Europeans, Arabs, North Africans, Christians and Muslims.
... my country "right its wrongs" should be the real brexit message...
It was always entirely foreseeable that Article 50 could only ever be used by unscrupulous politicians against law abiding civilians.
... this is the real referendum...
The real democracy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law is a reality.
The British State can only wage war by illegally using state violence, to try and stop law abiding civilians bringing successful legal challenges in courts of law.
|3. WE HIT JACKPOT WHEN WE BEAT WESTMINSTER'S GLOBAL MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR WAR PROPAGANDA RACKET'S 'FREE SPEECH' BAN & CROWNING GLORY IN BOGUS 'WAR ON TERROR'|
|WHO WILL SPEAK UP FOR & SAVE THE WORLD'S CHILDREN IF WE, THE PEOPLE DON'T ?|
|THIS IS WHY BLAIR WAS FORCED TO RESIGN, BUT NOT BEFORE THEY INVENTED ARTICLE 50 IN 2007:|
Patrick Cockburn: Yes, that’s true....
James Harkin: ...We paid them to tell us the information we wanted to know...
Chair: Mr Harkin, Mr Cockburn...you are giving us the headlines this afternoon
07.02.2007: BRIAN HAW WINS CHANNEL FOUR'S MOST POLITICALLY INSPIRING PERSON OF THE YEAR WITH 54% OF THE PUBLIC VOTE [GENERAL DANNATT WAS IN SECOND PLACE WITH 18%, TONY BLAIR 8% & DAVID CAMERON 6%}
[Channel Four subsequently changed the public voting system so it couldn't happen again]