In a time of universal deceit, trying to restore the real democracy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law, which is the natural human state, is an evolutionary act.
Day 6444: Tuesday 22nd Jan 2019
A violent global anarchy of big business
or a global community of people ?
The law abiding majority of civilians decide...
There are those who just talk about freedom and those of us who have proved how we make it a reality for everyone.
... brian and babs, bestest friends...
www.brianhaw.tv www.parliament-square.org
Brian and I were kindred spirits, who were the best of friends, with our powerful shared passion for love, peace and justice for everyone.
Brian died and I was forced out of the UK into stateless exile ("once an exile, twice an exile") in the European Union because we really did, unlike politicians and media barons, stand for free speech for law abiding... civilians.
We lived autonomously in the 'Golan Heights' of Parliament Square, Central London, putting our ideas, like the real democracy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law, into practice.
... the family... the sisters and the brothers and the daughters and the sons and the mothers and the fathers...
sent by email 27.11.2018:
Monsieur Michel Hameury,
Thank-you for your letter dated 15 November 2018 (copy attached) sent by you on behalf of your Director of Public Finances of an EU member state, requesting my response by 28 November 2018.
It has always been possible for your Director of Public Finances to make an appointment.
I am a 56 year old female political exile from the UK, who is 5 ft 5 and a half inches and 50 kg, who has no income and is in receipt of no benefits of any kind (because of the collective failure of EU member states to put basic protections in place for political exiles from within the EU) so I obviously dispute I could possibly meet any threshold for local taxes, while my civil jury lawsuits remain outstanding.
The letter from Intrum dated 14 November 2018 (see attached) who are a corporation also acting on behalf of your same EU member state regarding utilities, obviously lacks any legitimate legal basis or legal authority, let alone case law, to dispute the British Commonwealth are legally liable for my electricity bills and the reality my electricity has been illegally disconnected without my consent for the past six months. The British Commonwealth do not even dispute they are legally liable etc !
A reasonable and rational responsible adult would know the British Commonwealth a) forcibly exiled me intending to b) circumvent their own civil procedure that entitles me to a civil jury, while c) intending to meanwhile subject me to other member states civil procedures etc, d) while exploiting the collective failure of EU member states to have basic protections.
Therefore this serves as my Application to the ECJ, your Director of Public Finances and the EU President is served with which is uncontested so technically is a formality.
A eeasonable and rational responsible adult would agree, my Application to the ECJ to collect Thatcher’s rebate, is the only peaceful way I can reasonably claim the money owed to me by the British Commonwealth, including since Mother’s Day 26 March 2006.
I obviously do not personally need ‘Thatcher’s rebate’ but nor did the City of London bankers, but I am sure I can do far more good with the money than they have.
Therefore, the first instalment of €8 billion euros is payable to me by cheque, and when it has been paid by cheque so that I can open a bank account, then your Director of Public Finances is welcome to advise me on tax matters.
The sooner the better the first instalment is paid to me, given that I have been slowly starving for a year now, and am now obviously freezing.
This statement is true.
Donna (formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Notes:
1. The British and Australian intelligence services completely changed my identity as a child including my nationality (Italian) in a ‘process’ of racial and religious ‘purification’ in ‘Whites only’ Australia, for their own financial Treaty of Utrecht (colonial) and Catalan Gibraltar etc ‘reasons’.
It took until 29 October 2011 for the British Commonwealth to even admit the strangers who raised me, during the ‘Franco era’ who were not my parents worked for the (highest echelons of) British and Australian intelligence services, who have always illegally sought to stop me having and using my real identity etc etc. They illegally sought to recruit me, which I refused, because they obviously only wanted a ‘waiver’ over what they have done.
My real name is Donna.
‘Franco’ Cameron (a former British PM) publicly stated on 19 July 2009 that he would illegally ‘remove’ us without any caveats on how that was done, so there is no possible dispute I am a political exile or that politicians themselves illegally ‘banned’ me from even standing as a politician, while they illegally refused to lawfully settle civil jury lawsuits.
(Franco who was not neutral, began the Holocaust and WW2 when he started his war against the Catalan civilian population on 19 July 1936, and 30,000 Catalan children no-one ever speaks about went ‘missing’, before all the other leaders copied what he did, by targeting civilian populations)
The only way Catalans can possibly preserve our own identity among the more recent nation states of all sorts, is with our own passports and nationality, which is different from claiming ‘independence’ (whatever that means). The colonial half-way house called Australia are not in any way ‘independent’ of the British monarchy or Commonwealth, yet issue their own passports with nationality, before the revolving doors of politicians disown you anyway, while illegally denying you legal representation.
2, If my original High Court civil jury lawsuit from Mother’s Day 26 March 2006 had been heard in 2006, in a timely manner (before the torture etc began)
a) the discriminatory politically motivated s132-138 SOCPA 2005 that gave superior rights to (for example) the former Mayor of London Livingstone and the current leader of the Opposition Corbyn and their union leader cronies including from the Police Federation, would have been repealed then and they along with the top cop would have had to resign
They have always illegally concealed the original material disclosure including at their meeting at 8am on 8 December 2006 (their ‘Feast’ of the Immaculate Conception) after I had won void ab initio on 14 September 2006, of my formal complaint to Inspector Lyons on 26 March 2006.
b) there would have been a Mayoral election in… 2006, that would more likely than not have propelled Brian into the London Mayoralty where he would have had a role in peace efforts
(instead of Lynton Crosby and Vitol’s multi-million dollar switch between Labour and Tory in 2008 which was invalid (covering up 9 July 2007, 19 July 2007, 7 August 2007 and 17 August 2007 etc)
c) I would have made case law in the High Court that all proceedings in the Magistrates Court had to be tape recorded to avoid what was the cynical abuse of any and all due process by the state apparatus in the Magistrates Court.
If the government and their Magistrates Courts refuse to tape record proceedings they are not in any legal position to dispute anything, and nor should people be expected to attend what are really ‘black sites’ etc.
CO 5019 2007 (26 March 200…7, sought to stop a rehearing in the High Court over CO 4002 2006 (the original malicious White Rose prosecution on 22 February 2006)
The case files in CO 5019 2007 quote me on page 29 saying 26 March 2007 is a cover up over 26 March 2006 and my being tortured while already having 15 civil jury lawsuits, while Brian confirms in the case files, the Magistrates Courts in a country who is arguably the biggest surveillance state, need CCTV in their own Magistrates courts so there is a real record of what happens.
CO 5019 2007 was for example missing the key ingredients of a copy of the alleged summons illegally issued against me on 23 March 2007 to appear on 26 March 2007, which was obviously illegal, or any witness statement from the same Judge who had illegally issued the summons (who hadn’t by that time managed to file a case stated in CO 4002 2006) citing either Brian or myself for Contempt on 26 March 2007, because he never did.
In fact, all the malicious prosecutions against me in 2007 were in Contempt of a Southwark Crown Court Order made on 8 March 2007 by HH judge Wadsworth, that stated Parliament Square was my address (to stop all the unlawful arrests trying to circumvent ss 132- 138 SOCPA 2005, now repealed with specious bail conditions etc)
On 12 December 2007 the top cop gave his Goebbels Wansee speech dishonestly claiming he could use S 3(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967 without any case law, which was another excuse he invented after 26 March 2006
On 13 December 2007 I conclusively proved at Southwark Crown Court when I won everything, I had always used S 3(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967 with the case law (Wilmott v Atack)
Brian and myself filed CO 11393/2007 on the top cop on 19 December 2007, because I had already won everything between 26 March 2006 and 13 December 2007.
And so on.
d) I would have been given a record payout of basic, aggravated and exemplary damages over the discriminatory politically motivated legislation passed what is really one tribe of politicians.
I could have bought a property in Westminster to use as a campaign headquarters/community and civil centre so Brian could have built a new political party with ordinary members of the public, like ourselves, who want to stand as politicians.
Brian could have done the same with later civil jury payouts, so it is very, very serious what happened.
The tribe of politicians in Westminster were violently attacking any member of the public, to try and stop any competition, even from anyone, should they even want to stand as a politician !!
I properly sued for peace because that was the most sensible choice.
... the real brexit message should be..."my country right it's wrongs"... instead of politicians and their mouthpieces... across the spectrum, blaming... civilians for anything and everything...
My personal view is Brian's 'my country right it's wrongs' is the real Brexit message because the problem really is... politicians not civilians.
Donna (aka Babs)/Siddiqah
The Catalan witness ... once an exile, twice an exile ...
There's no reason the Golan Heights can't be a neutral multi-cultural state within jurisdiction of ECJ in European Union.
The global transition to clean energy is now inevitable and eco cities will become the norm on planet earth.
... the witness... it's about how politicians treat... defenceless civilian children and women...
The future is clean energy
The inevitable transformative global transition to clean energy, is the most exciting development on the horizon.
The retrospective Lateran Council IV 1215 etc was the original "tort(ure) of conversion" (against peaceful people, their property and land).
The Metropolitan 'Police' & MI5 lost all public trust and credibility being Murdoch's propagandists and henchmen:
... they have always been threatening & attacking... donna... the peacenik...
... 19 july 2011: murdoch et al covering up they were involved in both 19 july 2007 (illegally stopping me giving evidence in court) and 19 july 2009 (publicly threatening to illegally 'remove' me without any caveats) etc etc...
There's a connection between being illegally denied... legal representation and being forced into... exile.
... there is a rose at the foot of the mountains overlooking the sea 35 miles from the 'border'...
Murdoch has built his global media empire out of profiting from recklessly causing harm to defenceless civilians.
My lawsuit is the most incredible true story of the Blair & Co administration's capacity to lie about defenceless civilians... in the UK.
I was 44 years old...
It was always entirely foreseeable that Article 50 could only ever be used by unscrupulous politicians against law abiding civilians.
... this is the real referendum...
The real democracy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law is a reality.
The British State can only wage war by illegally using state violence, to try and stop law abiding civilians bringing successful legal challenges in courts of law.
...LATEST...
***********************
_____________________________________________________________________________________
We give true first hand accounts about being law abiding civilian resistance consistently challenging the corporate state, drawing on our real life experiences, unlike shallow 'news' media manufactured deceptions which only exist to dish out disinformation to the public.
1. It is a matter of fact we comprehensively beat Westminster in courts on December 13 2006 at Magistrates Court and December 13th 2007, at Southwark Crown Court, before and on the same day they signed their Article 50 divide and rule fraud.
The 'two veterans':
2.... on may 25th 2010 ... a global multi-billion dollar war propaganda racket maliciously targeting... 'two veterans'... is a completely busted flush... on their own pompous self-aggrandizing 'State Opening'...
| 3. WE HIT JACKPOT WHEN WE BEAT WESTMINSTER'S GLOBAL MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR WAR PROPAGANDA RACKET'S 'FREE SPEECH' BAN & CROWNING GLORY IN BOGUS 'WAR ON TERROR' |
"The most powerful campaigns are backed by the rule of law"
The 'Russian guy' hidden in full view:
... the australian government have always made sure their brexit asio assange sleaze-bag has a whole entourage of lawyers in tow... while we have been illegally denied legal representation.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Unsolicited emails:
The U.S. & Russian military are used as proxies to help 'pacify' civilian populations in the European Union through a completely false divide and rule.
... 'predatory drones'... trying to 'go behind' our high court jury lawsuit, hiding behind the utterly false pretext of 'journalism'...
General Chuck 'Operation Iraqi Freedom' Jacoby disinfo sponsors another unsolicited email.
Unsolicited emails were received from the U.K U.S and Russian [governments] who work together, on 17.11.2016, 23.11.2016 & 04.12.2016.
______________________________________
| WHO WILL SPEAK UP FOR & SAVE THE WORLD'S CHILDREN IF WE, THE PEOPLE DON'T ? |
______________________________________
______________________________________
| THIS IS WHY BLAIR WAS FORCED TO RESIGN, BUT NOT BEFORE THEY INVENTED ARTICLE 50 IN 2007: |
...black psyops @ 'black sites' in CENTRAL LONDON... September 4th 2006... charing cross 'police' station was WHY blair was forced to resign, but not before he invented article 50... [brown et al then had me unlawfully arrested and tortured in attempt to murder me at belgravia 'police' station on September 4th 2009 on his way out, which cameron et al all knew about]
__________________________________
The rule of law is a reality regardless of how much the political classes and their pulp fiction which passes itself off as journalism/'alt' media don't like that.
___________________________________
... June 23rd 2010 Brian and I [2 & 3] were the only real campaigners, surrounded by the rest who were all part of a separate MI5 'Democracy Village' that had started on May 1st 2010 including people posing as 'journalists' working for the British and foreign governments too [including Russia, who had copied Westminster's 'free speech' ban, we beat...]
I was illegally denied legal representation on 23 June 2010 because I was trying to lawfully 'blow the whistle' in the High Court on 21 June 2010, [after already having done so in legal proceedings in the Magistrates Courts that were suddenly 'adjourned on April 29 2010] all of which was prior to our High Court jury lawsuit in August 2011:
... Iraq War, what Iraq War ?... collecting the [oil] check... [June 24–27, 2003 – Putin the Pretender with Brexit Queen and Jack Straw et al being given the red carpet treatment in State visit to United Kingdom]...
[N.B: The maelstrom of MI5 'Democracy Village' that started on May 1st 2010 was a busted flush on May 25th 2010, so:
a) the BBC illegally edited and maliciously published audio given to them by the MET police over my unlawful arrest, that did the rounds
b) Boris Johnson went running to the High Court on May 26th 2010, to launch the malicious prosecution above against Brian and I before we were released, to avoid the Dunkirk they would have been forced to do then, if we had got to the High Court first]
The Guardian's ASIO Assange media sponsored roadshow at that time, and his entourage of Australian lawyers [I am an Australian-British dual national] were trying to cover up the spy ring etc etc etc we had inevitably been exposing in London.
If we had just 'gone along with' the 'old lie' mob rule mantra about a 'vote' perpetuated by the multiple layers, of lying politicians, police, spies, prosecutors, judges, conspiracy theorists, academics and their pulp fiction that passes itself off as journalism/'alt' media we would never have even forced the repeal of their global multi-billion dollar 'free speech' ban targeting us in their bogus 'War on Terror'.
The rule of law is a reality.
Vitol Oil Duncan's 'news' media version of what happened in 2008 is a complete fabrication [because he is trying to avoid going to prison like Jonathan Aitken]
VITOL OIL: THE 'SHADOW' GOVERNMENT IN WESTMINSTER
In February 2008 I did say Duncan is a war criminal etc which is no secret, although he tellingly lied and a) left out the part where I enquired about his "expenses" when b) he came up to me c) and targeted me on his way into Parliament [he was subsequently forced in June 2008, to register £160,000 he took from Vitol Oil to target me, bribing public officials]
The 8 March 2007 emails that were only disclosed in September 2010 show the collusion between Labour and Tories against we peaceniks, that has always gone on.
... Brexit's... 'Minister for Europe'... MI6 Al-Qaeda Duncan's staged 9/11 clip:
...says he doesn't do 'technical legal details' so he doesn't know if killing 3,000 civilians is a war crime... [20.12.2016]
... Brexit Boris' Foreign Office 'Minister for Europe' obfuscating about... law... in fact in the UK, law abiding civilians are unlawfully imprisoned without legal representation or trial for... doing the rule of law, westminster pretends they don't know..
Vitol Oil is really an MI6 front/'state within a state'
Vitol Oil have an annual turnover of around $270 billion that is similar to Exxon Mobil and the annual budget of the Saudi government, but with a 'profit ratio' higher than Goldman Sachs & Wall Street, because they have far, far fewer employees, because they profit from hijacking the entire apparatus of the state.
... june 2008... duncan wanted the brown envelope laundered through the conservative party but cameron didn't want his fingerprints on it...
I ended up with a still live High Court Order against MI6 Vitol Oil Duncan et al in April 2008 and the unprecedented High Court jury lawsuit against MI5 et al in August 2011, that we had really won many years ago.
______________________________________
"The most powerful campaigns are backed by the rule of law"
Our legal position is protected by our High Court jury lawsuit against the British Parliament filed on August 17th 2011 that includes our High Court Order against the government from April 2008, and goes all the way back to December 2005. In the interim this has forced the repeal of the 'free speech' ban in March 2012, and the overt retreat of MI5 'Democracy Village' on May 4th 2012.
The evidence of the pulp fiction maliciously involved includes the BBC, Murdoch's Sky News, Lord Rothermere's Daily Mail, the Guardian, Independent, Barclay Brothers Telegraph, London Evening Standard and Russia Today.
... August 17th 2007: was a wake up call when 7/7 Ken Livingstone's violent thug punched me in the head [that was witnessed by many members of the public] before, while being chased by Steve and Gary, running into the arms of Palace of Westminster 'Police' who 'disappeared' him through Charing Cross 'Police'...
*************************
Cem Ertur's ground-breaking report provides the information all law abiding civilians need to know.
10.09.2015 British Foreign Affairs Committee admit MI6 intelligence asset 'journalist' Patrick Cockburn et al Syria War [Propaganda] is a 'busted flush'.
Q24 Chair: So, in summary, our 'clients' in this exercise....are a complete 'busted flush'.
Patrick Cockburn: Yes, that’s true....
James Harkin: ...We paid them to tell us the information we wanted to know...
Chair: Mr Harkin, Mr Cockburn...you are giving us the headlines this afternoon
Patrick Cockburn: Yes, that’s true....
James Harkin: ...We paid them to tell us the information we wanted to know...
Chair: Mr Harkin, Mr Cockburn...you are giving us the headlines this afternoon
07.02.2007: BRIAN HAW WINS CHANNEL FOUR'S MOST POLITICALLY INSPIRING PERSON OF THE YEAR WITH 54% OF THE PUBLIC VOTE [GENERAL DANNATT WAS IN SECOND PLACE WITH 18%, TONY BLAIR 8% & DAVID CAMERON 6%}
[Channel Four subsequently changed the public voting system so it couldn't happen again]
"...When the press backed the war in Iraq, when both sides of the house backed the war in Iraq, Brian stood up to the Government," she [Tucker] says. Pink Dr Martens and 40 arrests notwithstanding, she has an easy-going charm...she and Mr Haw have been dragged to and from police cells and the courts in increasingly 'complex' attempts by the authorities to get rid of them...On 9 May, the latest court case...was pushed back to October. She is currently concerned about new legislation outlawing 24-hour protest. It would not be the first law [bought and paid for corporate legislation] seemingly tailor-made to evict them. If they are moved on, where would she go? "You can move us on, but to where? You'd have to bury our bodies. Either you believe in democracy, or you don't. We are living it " (Independent Newspaper)
"When the Labour Government introduced amendments to the 2005 Serious Organised Crime and Police Act, specifically to shift the stubborn Mr Haw from his spot, Mr Blunkett admitted that it was ‘using a sledgehammer to crack a nut’. Mr Haw survived that and numerous other attempts to get him to budge. He often had his collar felt by Her Majesty’s constabulary. Mr Haw took to sharing his megaphone with an antipodean woman. By then, those of us working nearby had become more than a little accustomed to Mr Haw’s trademark cry of:‘Tony B-liar! Tony B. L. I. A. R!’... When the antipodean Sheila started up we were all pathetically grateful, even though she had a voice as sharp as a seamstress’s needle. At least someone had changed the record! His determination was astonishing... there was something magnificently principled about the old boy. Shady agents provocateurs descended and caused trouble..."
[N.B: The Daily Mail who were a) never prosecuted by the Mayor of London, while being part of 'Democracy Village' see below were b) careful not to re-print Benedict Brogan's previously libelous hit piece from 2008 their lawyers had been warned about, that was commissioned by VITOL OIL, when Brogan said -ALL- the press had complained to the police !! because they wanted Babs arrested for using the loudspeaker !! The Daily Mail, along with other 'news' media like the BBC, were really part of, what they knew was a covert government run operation to try and cause us serious harm. The Daily Mail had illegally tried 'doorstepping' Babs in a lift in the High Court on 21 June 2010, after she had started lawfully 'blowing the whistle' in court on what was really going on.]
"To the casual observer they [Democracy Village who arrived on 1 May 2010] appear to be a group of hardcore protesters determined to take their campaign against the Afghanistan war to the very heart of the British Government. But after a fortnight living amongst the mish-mash of tents, protest banners and rainbow peace flags in the shadow of Big Ben, a very different picture emerged. By the time I arrived the camp had become little more than an al fresco dormitory for drug takers, drunks and the homeless. After my first night's sleep had been broken by the chimes of Big Ben every 15 minutes I emerged from my tent to discover a subdued atmosphere in the camp. A quick inspection of my companions' tents found many of them empty. Either they have got up exceptionally early to run an errand or, perhaps more likely, they have found a more comfortable place to sleep at night. The Democracy village protesters are camped alongside the long-term demonstrator Brian Haw, who set up camp on the pavement in 2001 in protest at Britain’s foreign policy against Iraq. Mr Haw has not taken kindly to the recent invasion and believes it may disrupt his ‘legitimate’ protest."
"At the peak of Democracy Village’s “occupation” of the square last summer, the protestors garnered considerable negative publicity. The camp became increasingly popular with alcoholics and drug-takers. In that context, it is not so surprising that Babs Tucker, Brian Haw’s number two, told television crews that “They are not our anti-war campaign.”
“Everyone knows that lot, Democracy Village, was set up in there,” says the nameless gentlemen, this time pointing over the road to the Palace of Westminster, “to use as an excuse to clear us all out. They are establishment agents.”
__________________________
Their 'covert' government run campaigns called Peacestrike & Democracy Village came legally unstuck incl. because they were really the one and same, run by the same people, who were publicly -lying- about 'complying' with ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 that while being used against our Parliament Square Peace Campaign, was not used against their Democracy Village who built a tent -city- in Parliament Square !!
The 'covert' government operation used undercovers to unlawfully arrest Brian and Babs on a number of occasions including 25 May 2010.
...FEATURED ARTICLES...
BRITISH IN-"JUSTICE"
...will continue to "offend" as she shows "no regard" for the "British Justice System"
source: Belgravia Police "Custody" Record 02.04.2012
_______________________________
The government lost all the court cases and still refused to return all the stolen property, which they stashed in the Museum of London so it could not be used, while they misrepresented they spoke for Brian and myself and so on, all without our consent.
In October 2007, when 7/7 Livingstone knew he was on his way out, while trying to cover up he had always been working with Blair, he maliciously had false and malicious allegations he had unlawfully arrested us over published, knowing that we had won the malicious prosecution he tried to bring against us:
"...Mr Cameron [current UK PM] today told Sky News' Sunday Live a future Tory government would [illegally use the entire apparatus of the violent corporate state to] take steps to have it [Parliament Square Peace Campaign] removed...
"...I am all for demonstrations, but my argument is `Enough is enough'."
David Cameron & Co could not take or hold Parliament Square, while our civilian resistance remains far more interested in seeing his signed and dated witness statement over the 'steps' he nevertheless illegally took.
"...Barbara Tucker, who has been [resisting NATO] protesting in Parliament Square for 10 years [7 years] uninterrupted and for the last 103 days without shelter, said talk of a loophole was a red herring as the law [legislation used by Wheeler's..husband] itself was invalid.
Ms Tucker said: “If she [Marina Wheeler] was a real human rights lawyer she would be saying nobody should be arrested, pulled up before the courts and lose their job for [resisting] protesting against this government.."
Ms Tucker said: “If she [Marina Wheeler] was a real human rights lawyer she would be saying nobody should be arrested, pulled up before the courts and lose their job for [resisting] protesting against this government.."
______________________________
Corporate legislation the murderous British State specifically made to try to violently criminalize and try to smash our long-standing campaign:
we did the 'time' to prove there is no 'crime' and civilians can get violent legislative frauds...repealed
A snapshot above of doing the 'time' to prove there is no 'crime' in not having the "permission" of the Genocidal British regime to uphold civilian society's rule of law, that is the opposite of their violent corporate legislative frauds.
The only purpose in selective/arbitrary 'summons'/unlawful 'arrests' processed through Magistrates courts (I live 24/7 civilian resistance) was to try and illegally prevent our having access to a civilian High Court jury to get legislation that had no lawful state 'power' of 'seizure' of civilian people or their property (banners & shelter) repealed.
The only purpose in selective/arbitrary 'summons'/unlawful 'arrests' processed through Magistrates courts (I live 24/7 civilian resistance) was to try and illegally prevent our having access to a civilian High Court jury to get legislation that had no lawful state 'power' of 'seizure' of civilian people or their property (banners & shelter) repealed.
ss 132-18 socpa 2005 was finally repealed in march 2012
(our High Court jury claim seeking the next repeal, against the British government over the latest legislation in the British High Court, is HQ12X03564)
These are some of our High Court proceedings: (which do not include the very many more malicious prosecutions brought against our campaign, in Magistrates and Crown Courts)
11. HQ11X00563: WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL v TUCKER (WESTMINSTER DISCONTINUED THEIR CLAIM, BUT OUR COUNTERCLAIM REMAINS)
Our -counterclaim- in HQ11X00563 remains outstanding.
We have a number of existing ground-breaking High Court claims against the British government incl. HQ12X01972 (the massive police raid on May 23rd 2006), HQ12X02745, HQ12X03564 (the massive police raid on January 16th 2012) & HQ13X03488.
Our case against the British government is put simply, that the British government attempts to illegally try to murder campaign members and smash our campaign -because- the British government is committing Genocide.
the rise of the...law abiding...majority.
"...never before seen...rebellion which is anti-elite... anti-press..."
Every single day, billions of people all around the world, unlike corporate 'politicians' and their many layers of propagandists including the heavily 'filtered' news media, continue to not harm anyone else.
The civilian society's rule of law can (ie: nationally) both prosecute war criminals (using universal jurisdiction & the precedent of Nuremberg) and as our campaign has proved, repeal violent corporate 'legislation'.
The European Court of Human Rights was specifically created to uphold the Nuremberg Trials through the oversight of EU 'governments', after 'royal' and 'political' leaders engineered the slaughter of civilians across Europe in World War One & Two.
War, which is always illegal and only ever started for financial interests, only ever targets civilians, to try and murder real resistance, that will only ever come from the people, who are always the law abiding majority.
"...war did not just happen it was planned and prepared for over a long period of time and with no small skill and cunning....
...the entire structure of offices and officials was dedicated to the criminal purposes and committed to the use of the criminal methods planned by these defendants and their co-conspirators...
...always contemplated not merely overcoming current opposition but exterminating elements which could not be reconciled with its philosophy of the state.
We have here the surviving top politicians, militarists, financiers, diplomats, administrators, and propagandists... Who was responsible for these crimes if they were not?
.....this declaration of the law has taken them by surprise....they really are surprised that there is any such thing as law.
International law, natural law, any law at all was to these men simply a propaganda device to be invoked when it helped and to be ignored when it would condemn what they wanted to do.
...the ultimate step in avoiding wars, which are inevitable in a system of international lawlessness, is to make statesmen responsible to law...[Nuremberg Trials]
...the entire structure of offices and officials was dedicated to the criminal purposes and committed to the use of the criminal methods planned by these defendants and their co-conspirators...
...always contemplated not merely overcoming current opposition but exterminating elements which could not be reconciled with its philosophy of the state.
We have here the surviving top politicians, militarists, financiers, diplomats, administrators, and propagandists... Who was responsible for these crimes if they were not?
.....this declaration of the law has taken them by surprise....they really are surprised that there is any such thing as law.
International law, natural law, any law at all was to these men simply a propaganda device to be invoked when it helped and to be ignored when it would condemn what they wanted to do.
...the ultimate step in avoiding wars, which are inevitable in a system of international lawlessness, is to make statesmen responsible to law...[Nuremberg Trials]
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
Our old website www.parliament-square.org.uk was hijacked by the British government and transferred in June 2013, to a rather opaque tooth fairy, called Jonathan Mallia, in Malta. That website, which is untruthful, does not reflect, and is not associated with our continuing campaign (refer: background)
Likewise the Wikipedia entry on Brian Haw does not reflect our campaign and was not endorsed by Brian Haw. The Wikipedia entry, mainly comprises mainstream media inventions, that have been added by people we do not know, that mostly just repeat the "official government" lies, about our campaign. Two links that direct to our campaign, have been added with our knowledge to the Wikipedia entry, on Brian, although the "supporters" link on Wikipedia, still goes to the old hijacked website. refer: "It's the Kids Stupid" written by Brian in December 2010, on this website.
WE ARE NOT 'PEACE STRIKE'/'DEMOCRACY VILLAGE' WHICH ARE COVERT BRITISH GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS that attempt to link to us.
