In a time of universal deceit, trying to restore the real democracy of the autonomy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law, which is the natural human state, is an evolutionary act.
BRIAN HAW :: 7th January 1949 - 18th June 2011
NEIL KERSLAKE :: 12th September 1958 - 1st October 2020
Day 7088: Tuesday 27th Oct 2020
A violent global anarchy of big business
or a global community of people ?
The law abiding majority of civilians decide...
There are those who just talk about freedom and those of us who have proved how we make it a reality for everyone.
... brian and babs, bestest friends...
www.brianhaw.tv www.parliament-square.org
There is unlimited potential in clean renewable energy to develop and build capacity in sustainable infrastructure to lessen inequality and make everyone healthy and wealthy. This means people will also have the freedom to choose their own cultural identity.
N.B This is not a 'news site' (ie:the he said/she said etc of media).
__________________________
I remember Brian (18.06.2019)
... I remember Brian... because I was there... and what we did was real...
Brian Haw was the greatest peacemaker of our times.
_______________________
Donna ‘Black-Cat’ Bugat: A Global Peace Deal (14.01.2020)
It is not legally possible for politicians to 'overtake' civil jury lawsuits against them, by any means.
I think everyone should have their own global peace deal, because the more peace there really is, the better for everyone.
...♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥...
...my name is donna...
♥♥♥♥♥
IN THE MATTER OF MY UNIVERSAL INJUNCTION TO STOP MY ‘ADOPTION’ IN CASE 352 IN COUNTY COURT IN MELBOURNE, THAT I DID NOT EVER GIVE MY INFORMED CONSENT TO AS A CHILD OR ADULT.
by Donna Bugat
Date of Document: 5th October 2020
Filed by: Donna Bugat
Prepared by: Donna Bugat
1. My name in Donna Bugat and I am an Australian citizen who was born in Carlton, Melbourne, Australia on 10 February 1962.
2. I am legally notifying courts of my universal injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ in Case 352 in the County Court in Melbourne, that I have never given my informed consent to, as either a child or adult.
My universal injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ which I did not ever give my informed consent to as a child or adult, will be filed in the relevant courts in all Australian states, and in the High Court in the UK with my High Court Order from April 2008, and the ECHR, along with the Hague Convention on ‘Intercountry adoptions’.
The British monarchy and Australian governor generals agree to give royal assent to my injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ that I did not ever give informed consent to as a child or adult, along with amended legislation to require the informed consent of children and adults to their adoptions too, along with adopted children's qualified right to discharge adoptions, and adult adopted people's absolute right to an automatic discharge of adoptions, all at no personal or financial cost to adopted people.
The fact anyone could be adopted for any number of reasons, does not provide legal grounds for lifelong adoption, but does highlight the additional legal 'complexities' involved in adoption cases, which in also involving issues of 'family law', means adopted people should not be discriminated against and treated differently compared to 'family law' cases not involving adoptions.
It must mandatory for all adopted children and adults to have legal representation, including that is independent, in their adoption cases.
All children are like adults supposed to be taught about the need for their informed consent, that equally applies to all adopted children and adults too.
All courts have a legal obligation to politely send out non adversarial questionnaires to adopted children and adults at an address agreed to by the adopted person to:
a) ensure informed consent is appropriately explained to adopted children according to their age, along with informing adopted children who they can speak to if it is necessary to have their case referred back to court, regarding informed consent
b) inquire before adopted people become adults, if the adopted person would like to continue their adoption as adults (it should never be possible for people to not even know they are adopted)
c) acknowledge that if adopted people do not choose to give informed consent for their adoption to continue as adults, it will at no cost to the adopted adult person, be automatically discontinued upon the adopted person becoming an adult, or at any time thereafter
d) agree proper provision for counselling, social welfare and suitable housing is provided upon request by the adopted person, to the adopted person, during any transition period, relating to the discontinuance of an adoption, regardless of whether or not the adopted person is a child or adult, living in Australia or elsewhere, or if the adoption that originated through a court in Australia is national or international.
3. In practise, my injunction means that according to private international law:
a) no public official anywhere, will ever be able to claim my adoption in Case 352 in the County Court of Melbourne, in the State of Victoria in Australia, continues
b) I do not have to pay any arbitrarily decided sum of money to public officials or indeed anyone else, anywhere, to exercise my absolute right to as an adult refuse to give informed consent for my adoption to continue
c) I am properly compensated for the longstanding failure to recognise the need for my informed consent to my adoption.
4. The simple legal reality is that without being able to exercise my absolute right to as an adult not give my informed consent for my ‘adoption’ to continue, it is impossible for me to give inextricably linked informed consent that is in any way meaningful, regarding health care.
5. I am claiming $3 million dollars in compensation which is tax free and cannot be means tested from the State of Victoria who will also pay any costs of any court issuing their stamped copy of my universal injunction to send to me, by email, is fine.
The State of Victoria will also pay any ‘excess costs’ on any global annual fully comprehensive travel, health and insurance policies of my choosing which means, pre-existing health conditions are included, along with legal representation.
The State of Victoria also confirm I am in addition, also eligible to claim disability support pension, from the Federal government, wherever I choose to live, in Australia and elsewhere, because my being subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment, including physical and emotional torture which has caused me prolonged PTSD etc, means the rules of non refoulement apply.
The universal rules regarding non refoulement mean no public official in Australia can stop me peacefully entering or leaving the country, at any time.
6. The published legal records in the High Court in the UK in 2011 regarding a malicious prosecution brought against me in 2010 (that went back and forth between the Court of Appeal, all while I was denied legal representation) confirm it is not legally possible (ie: it is an abuse of process) to ‘overtake’ existing lawsuits (ie: my High Court Order from April 2008 in the UK) including to award costs against me (which the High Court confirmed they could not do) because the universal legal reality is everyone, regardless of who they are, are legally obliged to first and foremost swear allegiance to the due process of the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
7. I do give my informed consent for anyone to have a stamped court copy of my injunction, because adopted people do need to know our informed consent is a very important universal right.
The best world there can be for everyone is one filled with the love of family and friends.
Signed by Donna Bugat
in the State of Victoria this
5th day of October 2020
Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxx, 22450, Brittany, France.
♥♥♥♥♥
I was raised by the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services who posed as my parents and godparents in the ‘adoption’ assimilation ‘experiment’ I have never given my informed consent to as either a child or adult.
The published legal records in the UK, when I was actively repealing the ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 free speech ban there (that included arbitrary ‘conditions’ imposed to try and limit us to 20 people within 3 metres that were proven to be ‘unworkable’ and therefore unlawful) prove the lifelong ‘bureaucrat’ and former Australian Labour PM (who like his far from 'humanitarian' wife, are certainly not ‘victims’ of Murdoch) was specifically recruited to be the Australian PM in 2007, to try and hide the political classes et al knew I am legally entitled to an injunction to stop my ’adoption’ along with compensation.
It all began to unravel in the High Court in the UK in April 2008, when I got a High Court Order, and then again in the High Court on 21st June 2010, when everyone tried to 'overtake' my High Court Order, which is why I was then illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010, while Rudd switched from being the PM in Australia to the Foreign Minister, because he was trying to cover up the records at DFAT which include witnesses in the UK, that directly implicate him in the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK.
The charlatan Rudd with his $1.2 billion dollar Tory UK government contracts (part of the ‘zero hours contracts’ racket) along with Johnson (who was Mayor of London then) and Starmer (who was the DPP then) were always working together to cover up the torture and attempted murder of me (the CCTV exists) precisely because they did always know I am legally entitled to a universal injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ along with compensation.
The fact my universal injunction to stop my adoption, along with compensation, can’t change what has already happened, can however help stop it continuing, and protect other ‘adopted’ people from unscrupulous racketeers like Rudd et al.
My injunction to stop my 'adoption' highlights of itself what a fraud Rudd is, along with other politicians and their crocodile tears over 'forced adoption' while I was in Parliament Square in Central London !! and they had illegal access to personal information they profited from, before I was exiled to France, which Rudd directly profited from too.
It is self evident, the only self serving opposition, politicians et al have, to injunctions from adopted people to stop forced 'adoptions' is because the 'experiments' were always intended to be forced 'assimilation'.
I obviously did not ever 'apply' or pay to be ‘adopted’ so it is self evident, I do not have to pay any ‘court fees’ that would have to be waived, for my injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ along with compensation.
♥♥
I originally travelled to the UK when I was four years old, when our beautiful boy from Barry in Wales was a young lad doing the early morning bread run, before he started playing golf.
… i feel your presence, my gentle darling with the most beautiful eyes…
NEIL KERSLAKE 12th September 1958 - 1st October 2020
♥♥
The beauty of life includes humanity has unlimited capacity to do good.
... my super mario brothers...
... my sons make the world a better place...
Donna 'Black-Cat' Bugat: Puisque tu pars... (The Garden of No Distant Place & Love 10.09.2019)
There have always been indigenous Jewish people living around the Mediterranean who are just as entitled to have at least one state like Europeans, Arabs, North Africans, Christians and Muslims.
... my country "right its wrongs" should be the real brexit message...
...♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥...
It was always entirely foreseeable that Article 50 could only ever be used by unscrupulous politicians against law abiding civilians.
... this is the real referendum...
The real democracy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law is a reality.
The British State can only wage war by illegally using state violence, to try and stop law abiding civilians bringing successful legal challenges in courts of law.
...LATEST...
***********************
_____________________________________________________________________________________
We give true first hand accounts about being law abiding civilian resistance consistently challenging the corporate state, drawing on our real life experiences, unlike shallow 'news' media manufactured deceptions which only exist to dish out disinformation to the public.
1. It is a matter of fact we comprehensively beat Westminster in courts on December 13 2006 at Magistrates Court and December 13th 2007, at Southwark Crown Court, before and on the same day they signed their Article 50 divide and rule fraud.
The 'two veterans':
2.... on may 25th 2010 ... a global multi-billion dollar war propaganda racket maliciously targeting... 'two veterans'... is a completely busted flush... on their own pompous self-aggrandizing 'State Opening'...
| 3. WE HIT JACKPOT WHEN WE BEAT WESTMINSTER'S GLOBAL MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR WAR PROPAGANDA RACKET'S 'FREE SPEECH' BAN & CROWNING GLORY IN BOGUS 'WAR ON TERROR' |
"The most powerful campaigns are backed by the rule of law"
The 'Russian guy' hidden in full view:
... the australian government have always made sure their brexit asio assange sleaze-bag has a whole entourage of lawyers in tow... while we have been illegally denied legal representation.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Unsolicited emails:
The U.S. & Russian military are used as proxies to help 'pacify' civilian populations in the European Union through a completely false divide and rule.
... 'predatory drones'... trying to 'go behind' our high court jury lawsuit, hiding behind the utterly false pretext of 'journalism'...
General Chuck 'Operation Iraqi Freedom' Jacoby disinfo sponsors another unsolicited email.
Unsolicited emails were received from the U.K U.S and Russian [governments] who work together, on 17.11.2016, 23.11.2016 & 04.12.2016.
______________________________________
| WHO WILL SPEAK UP FOR & SAVE THE WORLD'S CHILDREN IF WE, THE PEOPLE DON'T ? |
______________________________________
______________________________________
| THIS IS WHY BLAIR WAS FORCED TO RESIGN, BUT NOT BEFORE THEY INVENTED ARTICLE 50 IN 2007: |
...black psyops @ 'black sites' in CENTRAL LONDON... September 4th 2006... charing cross 'police' station was WHY blair was forced to resign, but not before he invented article 50... [brown et al then had me unlawfully arrested and tortured in attempt to murder me at belgravia 'police' station on September 4th 2009 on his way out, which cameron et al all knew about]
__________________________________
The rule of law is a reality regardless of how much the political classes and their pulp fiction which passes itself off as journalism/'alt' media don't like that.
___________________________________
... June 23rd 2010 Brian and I [2 & 3] were the only real campaigners, surrounded by the rest who were all part of a separate MI5 'Democracy Village' that had started on May 1st 2010 including people posing as 'journalists' working for the British and foreign governments too [including Russia, who had copied Westminster's 'free speech' ban, we beat...]
I was illegally denied legal representation on 23 June 2010 because I was trying to lawfully 'blow the whistle' in the High Court on 21 June 2010, [after already having done so in legal proceedings in the Magistrates Courts that were suddenly 'adjourned on April 29 2010] all of which was prior to our High Court jury lawsuit in August 2011:
... Iraq War, what Iraq War ?... collecting the [oil] check... [June 24–27, 2003 – Putin the Pretender with Brexit Queen and Jack Straw et al being given the red carpet treatment in State visit to United Kingdom]...
[N.B: The maelstrom of MI5 'Democracy Village' that started on May 1st 2010 was a busted flush on May 25th 2010, so:
a) the BBC illegally edited and maliciously published audio given to them by the MET police over my unlawful arrest, that did the rounds
b) Boris Johnson went running to the High Court on May 26th 2010, to launch the malicious prosecution above against Brian and I before we were released, to avoid the Dunkirk they would have been forced to do then, if we had got to the High Court first]
The Guardian's ASIO Assange media sponsored roadshow at that time, and his entourage of Australian lawyers [I am an Australian-British dual national] were trying to cover up the spy ring etc etc etc we had inevitably been exposing in London.
If we had just 'gone along with' the 'old lie' mob rule mantra about a 'vote' perpetuated by the multiple layers, of lying politicians, police, spies, prosecutors, judges, conspiracy theorists, academics and their pulp fiction that passes itself off as journalism/'alt' media we would never have even forced the repeal of their global multi-billion dollar 'free speech' ban targeting us in their bogus 'War on Terror'.
The rule of law is a reality.
Vitol Oil Duncan's 'news' media version of what happened in 2008 is a complete fabrication [because he is trying to avoid going to prison like Jonathan Aitken]
VITOL OIL: THE 'SHADOW' GOVERNMENT IN WESTMINSTER
In February 2008 I did say Duncan is a war criminal etc which is no secret, although he tellingly lied and a) left out the part where I enquired about his "expenses" when b) he came up to me c) and targeted me on his way into Parliament [he was subsequently forced in June 2008, to register £160,000 he took from Vitol Oil to target me, bribing public officials]
The 8 March 2007 emails that were only disclosed in September 2010 show the collusion between Labour and Tories against we peaceniks, that has always gone on.
... Brexit's... 'Minister for Europe'... MI6 Al-Qaeda Duncan's staged 9/11 clip:
...says he doesn't do 'technical legal details' so he doesn't know if killing 3,000 civilians is a war crime... [20.12.2016]
... Brexit Boris' Foreign Office 'Minister for Europe' obfuscating about... law... in fact in the UK, law abiding civilians are unlawfully imprisoned without legal representation or trial for... doing the rule of law, westminster pretends they don't know..
Vitol Oil is really an MI6 front/'state within a state'
Vitol Oil have an annual turnover of around $270 billion that is similar to Exxon Mobil and the annual budget of the Saudi government, but with a 'profit ratio' higher than Goldman Sachs & Wall Street, because they have far, far fewer employees, because they profit from hijacking the entire apparatus of the state.
... june 2008... duncan wanted the brown envelope laundered through the conservative party but cameron didn't want his fingerprints on it...
I ended up with a still live High Court Order against MI6 Vitol Oil Duncan et al in April 2008 and the unprecedented High Court jury lawsuit against MI5 et al in August 2011, that we had really won many years ago.
______________________________________
"The most powerful campaigns are backed by the rule of law"
Our legal position is protected by our High Court jury lawsuit against the British Parliament filed on August 17th 2011 that includes our High Court Order against the government from April 2008, and goes all the way back to December 2005. In the interim this has forced the repeal of the 'free speech' ban in March 2012, and the overt retreat of MI5 'Democracy Village' on May 4th 2012.
The evidence of the pulp fiction maliciously involved includes the BBC, Murdoch's Sky News, Lord Rothermere's Daily Mail, the Guardian, Independent, Barclay Brothers Telegraph, London Evening Standard and Russia Today.
... August 17th 2007: was a wake up call when 7/7 Ken Livingstone's violent thug punched me in the head [that was witnessed by many members of the public] before, while being chased by Steve and Gary, running into the arms of Palace of Westminster 'Police' who 'disappeared' him through Charing Cross 'Police'...
*************************
Cem Ertur's ground-breaking report provides the information all law abiding civilians need to know.
10.09.2015 British Foreign Affairs Committee admit MI6 intelligence asset 'journalist' Patrick Cockburn et al Syria War [Propaganda] is a 'busted flush'.
Q24 Chair: So, in summary, our 'clients' in this exercise....are a complete 'busted flush'.
Patrick Cockburn: Yes, that’s true....
James Harkin: ...We paid them to tell us the information we wanted to know...
Chair: Mr Harkin, Mr Cockburn...you are giving us the headlines this afternoon
Patrick Cockburn: Yes, that’s true....
James Harkin: ...We paid them to tell us the information we wanted to know...
Chair: Mr Harkin, Mr Cockburn...you are giving us the headlines this afternoon
07.02.2007: BRIAN HAW WINS CHANNEL FOUR'S MOST POLITICALLY INSPIRING PERSON OF THE YEAR WITH 54% OF THE PUBLIC VOTE [GENERAL DANNATT WAS IN SECOND PLACE WITH 18%, TONY BLAIR 8% & DAVID CAMERON 6%}
[Channel Four subsequently changed the public voting system so it couldn't happen again]
"...When the press backed the war in Iraq, when both sides of the house backed the war in Iraq, Brian stood up to the Government," she [Tucker] says. Pink Dr Martens and 40 arrests notwithstanding, she has an easy-going charm...she and Mr Haw have been dragged to and from police cells and the courts in increasingly 'complex' attempts by the authorities to get rid of them...On 9 May, the latest court case...was pushed back to October. She is currently concerned about new legislation outlawing 24-hour protest. It would not be the first law [bought and paid for corporate legislation] seemingly tailor-made to evict them. If they are moved on, where would she go? "You can move us on, but to where? You'd have to bury our bodies. Either you believe in democracy, or you don't. We are living it " (Independent Newspaper)
"When the Labour Government introduced amendments to the 2005 Serious Organised Crime and Police Act, specifically to shift the stubborn Mr Haw from his spot, Mr Blunkett admitted that it was ‘using a sledgehammer to crack a nut’. Mr Haw survived that and numerous other attempts to get him to budge. He often had his collar felt by Her Majesty’s constabulary. Mr Haw took to sharing his megaphone with an antipodean woman. By then, those of us working nearby had become more than a little accustomed to Mr Haw’s trademark cry of:‘Tony B-liar! Tony B. L. I. A. R!’... When the antipodean Sheila started up we were all pathetically grateful, even though she had a voice as sharp as a seamstress’s needle. At least someone had changed the record! His determination was astonishing... there was something magnificently principled about the old boy. Shady agents provocateurs descended and caused trouble..."
[N.B: The Daily Mail who were a) never prosecuted by the Mayor of London, while being part of 'Democracy Village' see below were b) careful not to re-print Benedict Brogan's previously libelous hit piece from 2008 their lawyers had been warned about, that was commissioned by VITOL OIL, when Brogan said -ALL- the press had complained to the police !! because they wanted Babs arrested for using the loudspeaker !! The Daily Mail, along with other 'news' media like the BBC, were really part of, what they knew was a covert government run operation to try and cause us serious harm. The Daily Mail had illegally tried 'doorstepping' Babs in a lift in the High Court on 21 June 2010, after she had started lawfully 'blowing the whistle' in court on what was really going on.]
"To the casual observer they [Democracy Village who arrived on 1 May 2010] appear to be a group of hardcore protesters determined to take their campaign against the Afghanistan war to the very heart of the British Government. But after a fortnight living amongst the mish-mash of tents, protest banners and rainbow peace flags in the shadow of Big Ben, a very different picture emerged. By the time I arrived the camp had become little more than an al fresco dormitory for drug takers, drunks and the homeless. After my first night's sleep had been broken by the chimes of Big Ben every 15 minutes I emerged from my tent to discover a subdued atmosphere in the camp. A quick inspection of my companions' tents found many of them empty. Either they have got up exceptionally early to run an errand or, perhaps more likely, they have found a more comfortable place to sleep at night. The Democracy village protesters are camped alongside the long-term demonstrator Brian Haw, who set up camp on the pavement in 2001 in protest at Britain’s foreign policy against Iraq. Mr Haw has not taken kindly to the recent invasion and believes it may disrupt his ‘legitimate’ protest."
"At the peak of Democracy Village’s “occupation” of the square last summer, the protestors garnered considerable negative publicity. The camp became increasingly popular with alcoholics and drug-takers. In that context, it is not so surprising that Babs Tucker, Brian Haw’s number two, told television crews that “They are not our anti-war campaign.”
“Everyone knows that lot, Democracy Village, was set up in there,” says the nameless gentlemen, this time pointing over the road to the Palace of Westminster, “to use as an excuse to clear us all out. They are establishment agents.”
__________________________
Their 'covert' government run campaigns called Peacestrike & Democracy Village came legally unstuck incl. because they were really the one and same, run by the same people, who were publicly -lying- about 'complying' with ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 that while being used against our Parliament Square Peace Campaign, was not used against their Democracy Village who built a tent -city- in Parliament Square !!
The 'covert' government operation used undercovers to unlawfully arrest Brian and Babs on a number of occasions including 25 May 2010.
...FEATURED ARTICLES...
BRITISH IN-"JUSTICE"
...will continue to "offend" as she shows "no regard" for the "British Justice System"
source: Belgravia Police "Custody" Record 02.04.2012
_______________________________
The government lost all the court cases and still refused to return all the stolen property, which they stashed in the Museum of London so it could not be used, while they misrepresented they spoke for Brian and myself and so on, all without our consent.
In October 2007, when 7/7 Livingstone knew he was on his way out, while trying to cover up he had always been working with Blair, he maliciously had false and malicious allegations he had unlawfully arrested us over published, knowing that we had won the malicious prosecution he tried to bring against us:
"...Mr Cameron [current UK PM] today told Sky News' Sunday Live a future Tory government would [illegally use the entire apparatus of the violent corporate state to] take steps to have it [Parliament Square Peace Campaign] removed...
"...I am all for demonstrations, but my argument is `Enough is enough'."
David Cameron & Co could not take or hold Parliament Square, while our civilian resistance remains far more interested in seeing his signed and dated witness statement over the 'steps' he nevertheless illegally took.
"...Barbara Tucker, who has been [resisting NATO] protesting in Parliament Square for 10 years [7 years] uninterrupted and for the last 103 days without shelter, said talk of a loophole was a red herring as the law [legislation used by Wheeler's..husband] itself was invalid.
Ms Tucker said: “If she [Marina Wheeler] was a real human rights lawyer she would be saying nobody should be arrested, pulled up before the courts and lose their job for [resisting] protesting against this government.."
Ms Tucker said: “If she [Marina Wheeler] was a real human rights lawyer she would be saying nobody should be arrested, pulled up before the courts and lose their job for [resisting] protesting against this government.."
______________________________
Corporate legislation the murderous British State specifically made to try to violently criminalize and try to smash our long-standing campaign:
we did the 'time' to prove there is no 'crime' and civilians can get violent legislative frauds...repealed
A snapshot above of doing the 'time' to prove there is no 'crime' in not having the "permission" of the Genocidal British regime to uphold civilian society's rule of law, that is the opposite of their violent corporate legislative frauds.
The only purpose in selective/arbitrary 'summons'/unlawful 'arrests' processed through Magistrates courts (I live 24/7 civilian resistance) was to try and illegally prevent our having access to a civilian High Court jury to get legislation that had no lawful state 'power' of 'seizure' of civilian people or their property (banners & shelter) repealed.
The only purpose in selective/arbitrary 'summons'/unlawful 'arrests' processed through Magistrates courts (I live 24/7 civilian resistance) was to try and illegally prevent our having access to a civilian High Court jury to get legislation that had no lawful state 'power' of 'seizure' of civilian people or their property (banners & shelter) repealed.
ss 132-18 socpa 2005 was finally repealed in march 2012
(our High Court jury claim seeking the next repeal, against the British government over the latest legislation in the British High Court, is HQ12X03564)
These are some of our High Court proceedings: (which do not include the very many more malicious prosecutions brought against our campaign, in Magistrates and Crown Courts)
11. HQ11X00563: WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL v TUCKER (WESTMINSTER DISCONTINUED THEIR CLAIM, BUT OUR COUNTERCLAIM REMAINS)
Our -counterclaim- in HQ11X00563 remains outstanding.
We have a number of existing ground-breaking High Court claims against the British government incl. HQ12X01972 (the massive police raid on May 23rd 2006), HQ12X02745, HQ12X03564 (the massive police raid on January 16th 2012) & HQ13X03488.
Our case against the British government is put simply, that the British government attempts to illegally try to murder campaign members and smash our campaign -because- the British government is committing Genocide.
the rise of the...law abiding...majority.
"...never before seen...rebellion which is anti-elite... anti-press..."
Every single day, billions of people all around the world, unlike corporate 'politicians' and their many layers of propagandists including the heavily 'filtered' news media, continue to not harm anyone else.
The civilian society's rule of law can (ie: nationally) both prosecute war criminals (using universal jurisdiction & the precedent of Nuremberg) and as our campaign has proved, repeal violent corporate 'legislation'.
The European Court of Human Rights was specifically created to uphold the Nuremberg Trials through the oversight of EU 'governments', after 'royal' and 'political' leaders engineered the slaughter of civilians across Europe in World War One & Two.
War, which is always illegal and only ever started for financial interests, only ever targets civilians, to try and murder real resistance, that will only ever come from the people, who are always the law abiding majority.
"...war did not just happen it was planned and prepared for over a long period of time and with no small skill and cunning....
...the entire structure of offices and officials was dedicated to the criminal purposes and committed to the use of the criminal methods planned by these defendants and their co-conspirators...
...always contemplated not merely overcoming current opposition but exterminating elements which could not be reconciled with its philosophy of the state.
We have here the surviving top politicians, militarists, financiers, diplomats, administrators, and propagandists... Who was responsible for these crimes if they were not?
.....this declaration of the law has taken them by surprise....they really are surprised that there is any such thing as law.
International law, natural law, any law at all was to these men simply a propaganda device to be invoked when it helped and to be ignored when it would condemn what they wanted to do.
...the ultimate step in avoiding wars, which are inevitable in a system of international lawlessness, is to make statesmen responsible to law...[Nuremberg Trials]
...the entire structure of offices and officials was dedicated to the criminal purposes and committed to the use of the criminal methods planned by these defendants and their co-conspirators...
...always contemplated not merely overcoming current opposition but exterminating elements which could not be reconciled with its philosophy of the state.
We have here the surviving top politicians, militarists, financiers, diplomats, administrators, and propagandists... Who was responsible for these crimes if they were not?
.....this declaration of the law has taken them by surprise....they really are surprised that there is any such thing as law.
International law, natural law, any law at all was to these men simply a propaganda device to be invoked when it helped and to be ignored when it would condemn what they wanted to do.
...the ultimate step in avoiding wars, which are inevitable in a system of international lawlessness, is to make statesmen responsible to law...[Nuremberg Trials]
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
Our old website www.parliament-square.org.uk was hijacked by the British government and transferred in June 2013, to a rather opaque tooth fairy, called Jonathan Mallia, in Malta. That website, which is untruthful, does not reflect, and is not associated with our continuing campaign (refer: background)
Likewise the Wikipedia entry on Brian Haw does not reflect our campaign and was not endorsed by Brian Haw. The Wikipedia entry, mainly comprises mainstream media inventions, that have been added by people we do not know, that mostly just repeat the "official government" lies, about our campaign. Two links that direct to our campaign, have been added with our knowledge to the Wikipedia entry, on Brian, although the "supporters" link on Wikipedia, still goes to the old hijacked website. refer: "It's the Kids Stupid" written by Brian in December 2010, on this website.
WE ARE NOT 'PEACE STRIKE'/'DEMOCRACY VILLAGE' WHICH ARE COVERT BRITISH GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS that attempt to link to us.
